Literature DB >> 12446253

Does handedness determine which hand leads in a bimanual task?

Elizabeth A Franz1, Andrew Rowse, Barbara Ballantine.   

Abstract

Right- and left-handers (n = 16 in each group) were tested on a bimanual circle task that required drawing either in the same direction (parallel) or in a mirror symmetrical coordination mode with the two hands. The authors' primary purposes were to examine the effect of circle direction on within-hand and between-hands variables and to determine whether the relation between hand lead and coordination mode (parallel or mirror symmetrical) differs for left- and right-handers. A strong relation was found between lead hand and movement condition, which depended on the direction of the movements and whether the task was parallel or mirror symmetrical. The pattern of results was similar for left- and right-handers on parallel tasks, but group differences were found with respect to mirror symmetrical tasks. At odds with the general claim that the dominant hand leads, the present results indicated that hand dominance does not generally determine which hand leads.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12446253     DOI: 10.1080/00222890209601956

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mot Behav        ISSN: 0022-2895            Impact factor:   1.328


  10 in total

1.  Fooling the brain into thinking it sees both hands moving enhances bimanual spatial coupling.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Tamara Packman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Asymmetry in grasp force matching and sense of effort.

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Samantha Scotland; Bernard J Martin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-01-05       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Laterally focused attention modulates asymmetric coupling in rhythmic interlimb coordination.

Authors:  Harjo J de Poel; C Lieke E Peper; Peter J Beek
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-10-05

4.  Establishing hand preference: why does it matter?

Authors:  Diane E Adamo; Anam Taufiq
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2011-02-24

5.  Disruption of bilateral temporal coordination during arm swinging in patients with hemiparesis.

Authors:  K I Ustinova; J Fung; M F Levin
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-12-06       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  The organization of intralimb and interlimb synergies in response to different joint dynamics.

Authors:  Ya-weng Tseng; John P Scholz; James C Galloway
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-11-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Network activation during bimanual movements in humans.

Authors:  R R Walsh; S L Small; E E Chen; A Solodkin
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2008-07-22       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  The left cerebral hemisphere may be dominant for the control of bimanual symmetric reach-to-grasp movements.

Authors:  Jarrod Blinch; Jason W Flindall; Łukasz Smaga; Kwanghee Jung; Claudia Lr Gonzalez
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-10-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Testing multiple coordination constraints with a novel bimanual visuomotor task.

Authors:  Helene M Sisti; Monique Geurts; René Clerckx; Jolien Gooijers; James P Coxon; Marcus H Heitger; Karen Caeyenberghs; Iseult A M Beets; Leen Serbruyns; Stephan P Swinnen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-08-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Motor extinction: a deficit of attention or intention?

Authors:  T David Punt; M Jane Riddoch; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 3.169

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.