Literature DB >> 21766223

The positive effect of mirror visual feedback on arm control in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy is dependent on which arm is viewed.

Ana R P Smorenburg1, Annick Ledebt, Max G Feltham, Frederik J A Deconinck, Geert J P Savelsbergh.   

Abstract

Mirror visual feedback has previously been found to reduce disproportionate interlimb variability and neuromuscular activity in the arm muscles in children with Spastic Hemiparetic Cerebral Palsy (SHCP). The aim of the current study was to determine whether these positive effects are generated by the mirror per se (i.e. the illusory perception of two symmetrically moving limbs, irrespective of which arm generates the mirror visual feedback) or by the visual illusion that the impaired arm has been substituted and appears to move with less jerk and in synchrony with the less-impaired arm (i.e. by mirror visual feedback of the less-impaired arm only). Therefore, we compared the effect of mirror visual feedback from the impaired and the less-impaired upper limb on the bimanual coupling and neuromuscular activity during a bimanual coordination task. Children with SHCP were asked to perform a bimanual symmetrical circular movement in three different visual feedback conditions (i.e. viewing the two arms, viewing only one arm, and viewing one arm and its mirror image), combined with two head orientation conditions (i.e. looking from the impaired and looking from the less-impaired body side). It was found that mirror visual feedback resulted in a reduction in the eccentric activity of the Biceps Brachii Brevis in the impaired limb compared to the condition with actual visual feedback from the two arms. More specifically, this effect was exclusive to mirror visual feedback from the less-impaired arm and absent when mirror visual feedback from the impaired arm was provided. Across conditions, the less-impaired arm was the leading limb, and the nature of this coupling was independent from visual condition or head orientation. Also, mirror visual feedback did not affect the intensity of the mean neuromuscular activity or the muscle activity of the Triceps Brachii Longus. It was concluded that the positive effects of mirror visual feedback in children with SHCP are not just the result of the perception of two symmetrically moving limbs. Instead, in order to induce a decrease in eccentric neuromuscular activity in the impaired limb, mirror visual feedback from the 'unaffected' less-impaired limb is required.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21766223      PMCID: PMC3159754          DOI: 10.1007/s00221-011-2789-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  24 in total

1.  Rehabilitation of hemiparesis after stroke with a mirror.

Authors:  E L Altschuler; S B Wisdom; L Stone; C Foster; D Galasko; D M Llewellyn; V S Ramachandran
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1999-06-12       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Fooling the brain into thinking it sees both hands moving enhances bimanual spatial coupling.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Franz; Tamara Packman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-02-07       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Attending to the non-preferred hand improves bimanual coordination in children.

Authors:  A M Pellegrini; E C Andrade; L A Teixeira
Journal:  Hum Mov Sci       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 2.161

4.  Mirror visual feedback induces lower neuromuscular activity in children with spastic hemiparetic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Max G Feltham; Annick Ledebt; Frederik J A Deconinck; Geert J P Savelsbergh
Journal:  Res Dev Disabil       Date:  2010-06-29

Review 5.  Cerebral dominance and asynchrony between bimanual two-dimensional movements.

Authors:  N Stucchi; P Viviani
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.332

Review 6.  Trunk muscle activation in low-back pain patients, an analysis of the literature.

Authors:  Jaap H van Dieën; Luc P J Selen; Jacek Cholewicki
Journal:  J Electromyogr Kinesiol       Date:  2003-08       Impact factor: 2.368

Review 7.  The use of visual feedback, in particular mirror visual feedback, in restoring brain function.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; Eric L Altschuler
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-06-08       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Is balance different in women with and without stress urinary incontinence?

Authors:  Michelle D Smith; Michel W Coppieters; Paul W Hodges
Journal:  Neurourol Urodyn       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.696

9.  Synaesthesia in phantom limbs induced with mirrors.

Authors:  V S Ramachandran; D Rogers-Ramachandran
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  1996-04-22       Impact factor: 5.349

10.  Fingertip force control during bimanual object lifting in hemiplegic cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Bert Steenbergen; Jeanne Charles; Andrew M Gordon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-01-26       Impact factor: 1.972

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of the effects of mirror therapy in children with cerebral palsy.

Authors:  Eom-Ji Park; Soon-Hyung Baek; Soohee Park
Journal:  J Phys Ther Sci       Date:  2016-11-29
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.