Literature DB >> 14763576

Comparison of human, canine, and ovine laryngeal dimensions.

Moon Jung Kim1, Eric J Hunter, Ingo R Titze.   

Abstract

Geometric measurement of the laryngeal skeleton is a fundamental step in laryngeal studies, especially in biomechanical modeling. Traditionally, canine larynges have been used as models of the human larynx because of their similarity in size and gross structure, but the search continues for an alternative model because of the diminishing availability of the canine species for research in the United States. In this report, a revised method for defining and labeling laryngeal framework parameters is proposed. Ovine laryngeal cartilages were measured, and the measurements were compared to those of human and canine cartilages previously reported in the literature. The ovine cricoid, thyroid, and arytenoid cartilages were significantly different from the human and canine cartilages. Also, the lack of a definite border between the true and false vocal folds revealed that the ovine model may not always be suitable for a direct comparison to the human larynx in phonation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14763576     DOI: 10.1177/000348940411300114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol        ISSN: 0003-4894            Impact factor:   1.547


  12 in total

1.  Review of range of arytenoid cartilage motion.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Acoust Res Lett Online       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Gender differences affecting vocal health of women in vocally demanding careers.

Authors:  Eric J Hunter; Kristine Tanner; Marshall E Smith
Journal:  Logoped Phoniatr Vocol       Date:  2011-07-04       Impact factor: 1.487

3.  A mixed-effects model approach for the statistical analysis of vocal fold viscoelastic shear properties.

Authors:  Chet C Xu; Roger W Chan; Han Sun; Xiaowei Zhan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-08-04

4.  Modeling the Pathophysiology of Phonotraumatic Vocal Hyperfunction With a Triangular Glottal Model of the Vocal Folds.

Authors:  Gabriel E Galindo; Sean D Peterson; Byron D Erath; Christian Castro; Robert E Hillman; Matías Zañartu
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 2.297

5.  A virtual trajectory model predicts differences in vocal fold kinematics in individuals with vocal hyperfunction.

Authors:  Cara E Stepp; Robert E Hillman; James T Heaton
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Interspecies comparison of mucosal wave properties using high-speed digital imaging.

Authors:  Michael F Regner; Mark J Robitaille; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.325

7.  An integrated simulator for endolaryngeal surgery.

Authors:  Iain J Nixon; Frank L Palmer; Ian Ganly; Snehal G Patel
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2011-11-17       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Vocal fold elasticity in the pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Sanyukta Jaiswal; Sarah Vigmostad
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 2.009

9.  Young's modulus of canine vocal fold cover layers.

Authors:  Dinesh K Chhetri; Sassan Rafizadeh
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.009

10.  Phonatory characteristics of excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Sanyukta Jaiswal
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 2.482

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.