Literature DB >> 20137893

Vocal fold elasticity in the pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Fariborz Alipour1, Sanyukta Jaiswal, Sarah Vigmostad.   

Abstract

Elastic characteristics of the pig, sheep, and cow vocal folds were investigated through a series of in vitro experiments. Sample strips of the vocal-fold tissue were dissected from pig, sheep, and cow vocal folds and mounted inside a saline-filled ergometer chamber that was maintained at 37°C ± 1°C. Sinusoidal elongation was applied on the samples to obtain the passive force measurements. Force and elongation data from the samples were recorded electronically with a dual-servo system (ergometer). Stress-Strain data were compared to characterize the interspecies differences in the elastic properties of vocal folds. Pig vocal folds exhibited the most nonlinear stress-strain relationship, indicating the presence of a high level of collagen fibers. Cow vocal folds had the highest Young's modulus, but the tissue displayed a nearly linear stress-strain profile. Previous studies of phonation in these three species have indicated that pig larynges have the highest range of phonation frequencies, making them a good candidate for animal studies. The current study provides quantitative data for the elastic properties of the oscillating laryngeal tissue in these species and indicates that nonlinear behavior of these tissues may lead to wider oscillation ranges.
Copyright © 2011 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20137893      PMCID: PMC2888685          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2009.09.002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  17 in total

1.  Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges.

Authors:  J J Jiang; J R Raviv; D G Hanson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Active and passive characteristics of the canine cricothyroid muscles.

Authors:  F Alipour; I Titze
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Comparison of human, canine, and ovine laryngeal dimensions.

Authors:  Moon Jung Kim; Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Mechanical properties of the vocal fold. Stress-strain studies.

Authors:  T Haji; K Mori; K Omori; N Isshiki
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.494

5.  Age-related changes of collagenous fibers in the human vocal fold mucosa.

Authors:  Kiminori Sato; Minoru Hirano; Tadashi Nakashima
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 1.547

6.  Cervids with different vocal behavior demonstrate different viscoelastic properties of their vocal folds.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Susan Lingle; Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  J Morphol       Date:  2010-01       Impact factor: 1.804

7.  Pressure-flow relationships during phonation as a function of adduction.

Authors:  F Alipour; R C Scherer; E Finnegan
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 2.009

8.  Comparative histology and vibration of the vocal folds: implications for experimental studies in microlaryngeal surgery.

Authors:  C G Garrett; J R Coleman; L Reinisch
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2000-05       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  Stress-strain response of the human vocal ligament.

Authors:  Y B Min; I R Titze; F Alipour-Haghighi
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Elastic models of vocal fold tissues.

Authors:  F Alipour-Haghighi; I R Titze
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  23 in total

1.  Optical measurements of vocal fold tensile properties: implications for phonatory mechanics.

Authors:  Jordan E Kelleher; Thomas Siegmund; Roger W Chan; Erin A Henslee
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-04-15       Impact factor: 2.712

2.  Phonatory characteristics of the excised human larynx in comparison to other species.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Eileen M Finnegan; Sanyukta Jaiswal
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 3.  Development of Excised Larynx.

Authors:  Rong Luo; Weijia Kong; Xin Wei; Jim Lamb; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  High-frequency viscoelastic shear properties of vocal fold tissues: implications for vocal fold tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean S Teller; Alexandra J E Farran; Longxi Xiao; Tong Jiao; Randall L Duncan; Rodney J Clifton; Xinqiao Jia
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.845

5.  Quantitative assessment of the anisotropy of vocal fold tissue using shear rheometry and traction testing.

Authors:  Amir K Miri; Rosaire Mongrain; Lei Xi Chen; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2012-09-27       Impact factor: 2.712

6.  Ovine Vocal Fold Tissue Fatigue Response to Accumulated, Large-Amplitude Vibration Exposure at Phonatory Frequencies.

Authors:  Roger W Chan
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2019-11-26       Impact factor: 2.297

7.  Nanoscale viscoelasticity of extracellular matrix proteins in soft tissues: A multiscale approach.

Authors:  Amir K Miri; Hossein K Heris; Luc Mongeau; Farhad Javid
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-11-12

8.  Indentation of poroviscoelastic vocal fold tissue using an atomic force microscope.

Authors:  Hossein K Heris; Amir K Miri; Umakanta Tripathy; Francois Barthelat; Luc Mongeau
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2013-06-14

9.  Elasticity and stress relaxation of a very small vocal fold.

Authors:  Tobias Riede; Alexander York; Stephen Furst; Rolf Müller; Stefan Seelecke
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2011-05-08       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 10.  Functional assessment of the ex vivo vocal folds through biomechanical testing: A review.

Authors:  Gregory R Dion; Seema Jeswani; Scott Roof; Mark Fritz; Paulo G Coelho; Michael Sobieraj; Milan R Amin; Ryan C Branski
Journal:  Mater Sci Eng C Mater Biol Appl       Date:  2016-04-08       Impact factor: 7.328

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.