Literature DB >> 20513038

Interspecies comparison of mucosal wave properties using high-speed digital imaging.

Michael F Regner1, Mark J Robitaille, Jack J Jiang.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: The purpose of this study was to compare the vocal fold vibratory characteristics of ex vivo bovine, canine, ovine, and porcine larynges to human male and female vocal fold vibrations to determine the best model organism for laryngeal studies concerning vibratory and kinetic characteristics. STUDY
DESIGN: Prospective experimental.
METHODS: High-speed videos of phonation were gathered at 4,000 frames per second (fps) in the animal models and human high-speed endoscopy data were gathered at 2,000 fps. Videos were converted into kymograms, and the amplitude, oscillation frequency, and phase difference of vocal fold vibration were measured.
RESULTS: No statistically significant differences were found with respect to frequency, amplitude, or phase difference between canines and humans. Porcines were not significantly different from human females but did have an oscillation frequency significantly different from human males. Ovine vibrational amplitudes were significantly different from humans, and bovine frequency and amplitude differed significantly from humans.
CONCLUSIONS: Canine and porcine larynges are the most appropriate model specimens for laryngeal studies contingent on vibratory or kinetic properties of phonation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20513038      PMCID: PMC3212406          DOI: 10.1002/lary.20884

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Laryngoscope        ISSN: 0023-852X            Impact factor:   3.325


  16 in total

1.  A preclinical model for laryngeal transplantation: anatomy and mucosal immunology of the porcine larynx.

Authors:  G K Gorti; M A Birchall; K Haverson; P Macchiarini; M Bailey
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1999-12-15       Impact factor: 4.939

2.  Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges.

Authors:  J J Jiang; J R Raviv; D G Hanson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.547

3.  Comparison of human, canine, and ovine laryngeal dimensions.

Authors:  Moon Jung Kim; Eric J Hunter; Ingo R Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Rules for controlling low-dimensional vocal fold models with muscle activation.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Brad H Story
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Glottal airflow resistance in excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Sanyukta Jaiswal
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2007-11-19       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Comparative histochemistry of human and sheep laryngeal muscles.

Authors:  W Happak; M Zrunek; U Pechmann; W Streinzer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Morphological structure of the vocal cord as a vibrator and its variations.

Authors:  M Hirano
Journal:  Folia Phoniatr (Basel)       Date:  1974

8.  Comparative anatomy of human and sheep laryngeal skeleton.

Authors:  M Zrunek; W Happak; M Hermann; W Streinzer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

9.  Geometric characterization of the laryngeal cartilage framework for the purpose of biomechanical modeling.

Authors:  N Tayama; R W Chan; K Kaga; I R Titze
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.547

10.  Normal vibration frequencies of the vocal ligament.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Eric J Hunter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  7 in total

1.  High-frequency viscoelastic shear properties of vocal fold tissues: implications for vocal fold tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean S Teller; Alexandra J E Farran; Longxi Xiao; Tong Jiao; Randall L Duncan; Rodney J Clifton; Xinqiao Jia
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.845

Review 2.  Characterization of vocal fold scar formation, prophylaxis, and treatment using animal models.

Authors:  Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.064

3.  Nonlinear dynamic-based analysis of severe dysphonia in patients with vocal fold scar and sulcus vocalis.

Authors:  Seong Hee Choi; Yu Zhang; Jack J Jiang; Diane M Bless; Nathan V Welham
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Investigation of phonatory characteristics using ex vivo rabbit larynges.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; Stefan Kniesburges; David A Berry; Veronika Birk; Olaf Wendler; Stephan Dürr; Christoph Alexiou; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Use of the rabbit larynx in an excised larynx setup.

Authors:  Allison L Maytag; Mark J Robitaille; Adam L Rieves; James Madsen; Benjamin L Smith; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  Young's modulus of canine vocal fold cover layers.

Authors:  Dinesh K Chhetri; Sassan Rafizadeh
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Nonlinear analyses of elicited modal, raised, and pressed rabbit phonation.

Authors:  Shaheen N Awan; Carolyn K Novaleski; Bernard Rousseau
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2014-05-16       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.