Literature DB >> 18537405

Phonatory characteristics of excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges.

Fariborz Alipour1, Sanyukta Jaiswal.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the phonatory characteristics of pig, sheep, and cow excised larynges and to find out which of these animal species is the best model for human phonation. Excised pig, sheep, and cow larynges were prepared and mounted over a tapered tube on the excised bench that supplied pressurized, heated, and humidified air in a manner similar to that for excised canine models. Each excised larynx was subjected to a series of pressure-flow experiments with adduction as major control parameter. The subglottal pressure, electroglottograph (EGG), mean flow rate, audio signal, and sound pressure level were recorded during each experiment. EGG signal was used to extract the fundamental frequency. It was found that pressure-frequency relations were nonlinear for these species with large rate of frequency changes for the pig. The average oscillation frequencies for these species were 220+/-57 Hz for the pig, 102+/-33 Hz for the sheep, and 73+/-10 Hz for the cow. The average phonation threshold pressure for the pig was 7.4+/-2.0 cm H(2)O, 6.9+/-2.9 cm H(2)O for the sheep, and 4.4+/-2.3 cm H(2)O for the cow.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18537405      PMCID: PMC2468220          DOI: 10.1121/1.2908289

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   2.482


  20 in total

1.  Comparison of the phonation-related structures among pig, dog, white-tailed deer, and human larynges.

Authors:  J J Jiang; J R Raviv; D G Hanson
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  Intrinsic muscles and distribution of the recurrent laryngeal nerve in the pig larynx.

Authors:  Melanie J Knight; Stephen E McDonald; Martin A Birchall
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2004-08-20       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Aerodynamic and acoustic effects of false vocal folds and epiglottis in excised larynx models.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Sanyukta Jaiswal; Eileen Finnegan
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.547

4.  Aerodynamic profiles of a hemilarynx with a vocal tract.

Authors:  F Alipour; D Montequin; N Tayama
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 1.547

5.  Mechanics of voice production. I. Regulation of vocal intensity.

Authors:  T Koyama; M Kawasaki; J H Ogura
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1969-03       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Comparative anatomy of human and sheep laryngeal skeleton.

Authors:  M Zrunek; W Happak; M Hermann; W Streinzer
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  1988 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Glottographic analysis of phonation in the excised canine larynx.

Authors:  D H Slavit; R J Lipton; T V McCaffrey
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  1990-05       Impact factor: 1.547

8.  The effect of recurrent laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.

Authors:  G S Berke; D M Moore; B R Gerratt; D G Hanson; T S Bell; M Natividad
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1989-09       Impact factor: 3.325

9.  On pressure-frequency relations in the excised larynx.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Ronald C Scherer
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Effect of superior laryngeal nerve stimulation on phonation in an in vivo canine model.

Authors:  G S Berke; D M Moore; B R Gerratt; D G Hanson; M Natividad
Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol       Date:  1989 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.808

View more
  29 in total

1.  Vocal power and pressure-flow relationships in excised tiger larynges.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; W Tecumseh Fitch; Eric J Hunter; Fariborz Alipour; Douglas Montequin; Douglas L Armstrong; Joann McGee; Edward J Walsh
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2010-11-15       Impact factor: 3.312

2.  Automated setup for ex vivo larynx experiments.

Authors:  Veronika Birk; Michael Döllinger; Alexander Sutor; David A Berry; Dominik Gedeon; Maximilian Traxdorf; Olaf Wendler; Christopher Bohr; Stefan Kniesburges
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Phonatory characteristics of the excised human larynx in comparison to other species.

Authors:  Fariborz Alipour; Eileen M Finnegan; Sanyukta Jaiswal
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Quantification of Porcine Vocal Fold Geometry.

Authors:  Kimberly A Stevens; Scott L Thomson; Marie E Jetté; Susan L Thibeault
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2015-08-17       Impact factor: 2.009

Review 5.  Development of Excised Larynx.

Authors:  Rong Luo; Weijia Kong; Xin Wei; Jim Lamb; Jack J Jiang
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 2.009

6.  High-frequency viscoelastic shear properties of vocal fold tissues: implications for vocal fold tissue engineering.

Authors:  Sean S Teller; Alexandra J E Farran; Longxi Xiao; Tong Jiao; Randall L Duncan; Rodney J Clifton; Xinqiao Jia
Journal:  Tissue Eng Part A       Date:  2012-08-07       Impact factor: 3.845

7.  A mixed-effects model approach for the statistical analysis of vocal fold viscoelastic shear properties.

Authors:  Chet C Xu; Roger W Chan; Han Sun; Xiaowei Zhan
Journal:  J Mech Behav Biomed Mater       Date:  2017-08-04

8.  Influence of glottal closure on the phonatory process in ex vivo porcine larynges.

Authors:  Veronika Birk; Stefan Kniesburges; Marion Semmler; David A Berry; Christopher Bohr; Michael Döllinger; Anne Schützenberger
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  A cervid vocal fold model suggests greater glottal efficiency in calling at high frequencies.

Authors:  Ingo R Titze; Tobias Riede
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2010-08-19       Impact factor: 4.475

10.  Developmental changes in the connective tissues of the porcine recurrent laryngeal nerve.

Authors:  Ellen O Campbell; Robin A Samlan; Nathaniel T McMullen; Sarah Cook; Suzette Smiley-Jewell; Julie Barkmeier-Kraemer
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-04-17       Impact factor: 2.610

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.