Literature DB >> 14747912

[Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision hip prosthesis].

A Schuh1, U Holzwarth, G Zeiler.   

Abstract

In revision arthroplasty of the hip, femoral defects and fractures must be bridged by a long stem. The implant has to be adapted exactly to the diameter of the cortical tube and has to be placed distally beyond the pathologic area. The titanium modular revision prosthesis (MRP) stem consists of the titanium alloy Ti6Al7Nb and is offered in various diameters, lengths, and special devices, which allows individual and load-stable reconstruction. The aim of the current study is to scrutinize first clinical and radiological results of the titanium MRP revision stem in revision arthroplasty of the hip. We report the midterm results of 130 non-cemented revision arthroplasties of the hip using the titanium MRP revision stem with a mean follow-up of 2.9 years (minimum: 1 year, maximum: 8 years), including 56 men and 74 women. The indication for revision arthroplasty was aseptic loosening of the cup and stem in 94 cases, loosening of the stem in 17 cases, reimplantation in a Girdlestone situation in 11, and periprosthetic fractures in 8 cases. The Harris hip score improved from 50.9+/-24.6 preoperatively to 88.5+/-11.5 postoperatively. The score according to Merle d'Aubigné improved from 9.8+/-4.0 preoperatively to 15.2+/-2.8 postoperatively. We found three recurrent dislocations, two lesions of the sciatic nerve, three cases of persisting deep infection, two periprosthetic fractures, and one case of subsidence of the stem of 2 cm required revision of the MRP stem. Atrophy of the proximal femur was visible in all cases with a stem diameter >17 mm (39/130). Stable primary fixation was achieved in 129 of 130 cases. The titanium MRP revision has proved to be a very reliable implant in cementless revision arthroplasty of the hip.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14747912     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-003-0543-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  15 in total

1.  Supportive strut grafts for diaphyseal bone defects in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B Barden; J G Fitzek; C Huttegger; F Löer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  A modular femoral implant for uncemented stem revision in THR.

Authors:  D C Wirtz; K D Heller; U Holzwarth; C Siebert; R P Pitto; G Zeiler; B A Blencke; R Forst
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2000       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Cementless femoral revision arthroplasty. 2- to 5-year results with a modular titanium alloy stem.

Authors:  J A Smith; H K Dunn; B J Manaster
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1997-02       Impact factor: 4.757

4.  Results of cementless revision for failed cemented total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  C A Engh; A H Glassman; W L Griffin; J G Mayer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1988-10       Impact factor: 4.176

5.  Revision total hip replacement using the S-ROM femoral component.

Authors:  H P Chandler; D K Ayres; R C Tan; L C Anderson; A K Varma
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  The tradeoffs associated with modular hip prostheses.

Authors:  J P Collier; M B Mayor; I R Williams; V A Surprenant; H P Surprenant; B H Currier
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Complications related to modularity of total hip components.

Authors:  R L Barrack; D W Burke; S D Cook; H B Skinner; W H Harris
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

8.  The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions.

Authors:  H U Cameron
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

9.  Reconstruction of major segmental loss of the proximal femur in revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Chandler; J Clark; S Murphy; J McCarthy; B Penenberg; K Danylchuk; B Roehr
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  In vivo corrosion of modular hip prosthesis components in mixed and similar metal combinations. The effect of crevice, stress, motion, and alloy coupling.

Authors:  J L Gilbert; C A Buckley; J J Jacobs
Journal:  J Biomed Mater Res       Date:  1993-12
View more
  5 in total

1.  [Revision hip stems: an analysis of the fixation].

Authors:  M Thomsen; J P Kretzer; C Heisel; C Lee; J Nadorf; E Jakubowitz
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [Replacement of femoral hip prostheses].

Authors:  M Rudert; M Hoberg; P M Prodinger; R Gradinger; B M Holzapfel
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 3.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; P M Prodinger; M Hoberg; R Meffert; M Rudert; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  High medium-term survival of Zweymüller SLR-plus stem used in femoral revision.

Authors:  Panagiotis Korovessis; Thomas Repantis
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-03-03       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 5.  [Periprosthetic fractures of the acetabulum and femur : Causes-classification-treatment algorithms].

Authors:  D M Ates; P Koenen; R Otchwemah; H Bäthis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 1.087

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.