Literature DB >> 20405105

[Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

B M Holzapfel1, P M Prodinger, M Hoberg, R Meffert, M Rudert, R Gradinger.   

Abstract

The number of periprosthetic fractures following hip replacement is increasing due to longer life expectancy and the rising number of joint replacements. The main causes of periprosthetic fractures include trauma, implant specific factors or loosening of the endoprosthesis. When planning therapy, surgeons should consider specific and general implant- and patient-related risk factors to ensure the best possible treatment. Established classification systems can facilitate preoperative planning. At present, the Vancouver classification system probably comes closest to the ideal, as it considers fracture configuration, stability of the implant and quality of the bone stock. Depending on these factors, therapeutic options include conservative treatment, fracture stabilisation or replacement of the endoprosthesis. The problems associated with periprosthetic fractures of varying etiology and the available treatment options are discussed against the background of the established classification systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 20405105     DOI: 10.1007/s00132-010-1612-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  66 in total

1.  The reliability and validity of the Vancouver classification of femoral fractures after hip replacement.

Authors:  O H Brady; D S Garbuz; B A Masri; C P Duncan
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 4.757

2.  Artificial hip prosthesis in acute and nonunion fractures of the femoral neck: follow-up study of seventy cases.

Authors:  I B HORWITZ; M I LENOBEL
Journal:  J Am Med Assoc       Date:  1954-06-05

Review 3.  Modular revision stems in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Richard E Jones
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Stabilisation of periprosthetic fractures with angular stable internal fixation: a report of 13 cases.

Authors:  M J Kääb; U Stöckle; M Schütz; J Stefansky; C Perka; N P Haas
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2005-12-23       Impact factor: 3.067

Review 5.  Fractures of the femur after hip replacement.

Authors:  C P Duncan; B A Masri
Journal:  Instr Course Lect       Date:  1995

6.  Intramedullary stabilization of periprosthetic fractures of the femur taking special account of bone defects.

Authors:  Christoph Eingartner; Rüdiger Volkmann; Uwe Ochs; Daniel Egetemeyr; Kuno Weise
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.154

7.  Classification and management of acetabular abnormalities in total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J A D'Antonio; W N Capello; L S Borden; W L Bargar; B F Bierbaum; W G Boettcher; M E Steinberg; S D Stulberg; J H Wedge
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1989-06       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

9.  [Periprosthetic supracondylar femoral fractures: LISS or retrograde intramedullary nailing? Problems with the use of minimally invasive technique].

Authors:  M Wick; E J Müller; F Kutscha-Lissberg; F Hopf; G Muhr
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Mortality after periprosthetic fracture of the femur.

Authors:  Timothy Bhattacharyya; Denis Chang; James B Meigs; Daniel M Estok; Henrik Malchau
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 5.284

View more
  7 in total

1.  Impaction bone grafting for the reconstruction of large bone defects in revision knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  M Rudert; B M Holzapfel; E von Rottkay; D E Holzapfel; U Noeth
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 1.154

Review 2.  Incidence and predisposing factors of periprosthetic proximal femoral fractures: a literature review.

Authors:  Claudia C Sidler-Maier; James P Waddell
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Postoperative periprosthetic fractures in patients with an Exeter stem due to a femoral neck fracture: cumulative incidence and surgical outcome.

Authors:  Christian Inngul; Anders Enocson
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 4.  [Periprosthetic acetabular fractures in geriatric patients].

Authors:  S C Herath; M F R Rollmann; T Histing; J H Holstein; T Pohlemann
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2017-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Mono- versus polyaxial locking plates in distal femur fractures: a prospective randomized multicentre clinical trial.

Authors:  Marc Hanschen; Ina M Aschenbrenner; Kai Fehske; Sonja Kirchhoff; Leonhard Keil; Boris M Holzapfel; Sebastian Winkler; Bernd Fuechtmeier; Rainer Neugebauer; Sven Luehrs; Ulrich Liener; Peter Biberthaler
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2013-12-11       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 6.  [Periprosthetic fractures following total hip and knee arthroplasty: Risk factors, epidemiological aspects, diagnostics and classification systems].

Authors:  M Fuchs; C Perka; P von Roth
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  Simultaneous periprosthetic acetabular fracture and contralateral B-type compression injury of the pelvic ring: a case report of a rare injury combination.

Authors:  Sven Märdian; Klaus-Dieter Schaser; Florian Wichlas; Philipp Schwabe
Journal:  Case Rep Orthop       Date:  2013-10-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.