Literature DB >> 8118994

The two- to six-year results with a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement used in hip revisions.

H U Cameron1.   

Abstract

A review of the two- to six-year results of revision cases using a proximally modular noncemented total hip replacement has been carried out. There were 91 cases. A primary stem was used in 29 and a long curved revision calcar replacement stem in 62. The results of the primary cases were 80% excellent, 6% good, 9% fair, and 5% poor. In the revision stem cases, 69.4% were excellent, 11.5% good, 7.6% fair, and 11.5% poor. One primary stem case was revised for acetabular migration. Ten of the revision stem cases were rerevised, four for femoral perforation, three for sepsis reactivation, one for acetabular migration, one acetabular component for dislocation, and one stem for trochanteric nonunion. There have been no stems or sleeve fractures, no implant dissociations and no osteolysis. In those reexplored, no metallosis has been found. Only three cases required structural allografting on the femoral side. These early results are promising and no untoward reactions have occurred as the result of the use of a modular stem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 8118994

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  11 in total

1.  Revision total hip arthroplasty combined with subtrochanteric shortening osteotomy: case report.

Authors:  Motoki Sonohata; Masaru Kitajima; Syunsuke Kawano; Hidefumi Honke; Takao Hotokebuchi; Masaaki Mawatari
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2014-03-07

2.  Fixation pattern of conical and cylindrical modular revision hip stems in different size bone defects.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Jan Nadorf; Marc N Thomsen; Christian Heisel; Alexander Jahnke; Jan P Kretzer; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Strut grafts in revision hip arthroplasty faced with femoral bone defects: an experimental analysis.

Authors:  Stefan Kinkel; Marc N Thomsen; Jan Nadorf; Christian Heisel; Michael C Tanner; Eike Jakubowitz
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-01-03       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Mid-term Results of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Modular Cementless Femoral Stems.

Authors:  Hyung-Gyu Jang; Kyung-Jae Lee; Byung-Woo Min; Hee-Uk Ye; Kyung-Hwan Lim
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2015-09-30

5.  [Revision arthroplasty of the hip: modularity of neck and metaphyseal components].

Authors:  G Köster; T A Walde
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 6.  [Revision hip arthroplastiy of the hip joint. Revision of the femur: which implant is indicated when?].

Authors:  A Gruner; K-D Heller
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.087

7.  [Titanium modular revision prosthesis stem in revision hip prosthesis].

Authors:  A Schuh; U Holzwarth; G Zeiler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 8.  Outcomes of dual modular cementless femoral stems in revision hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ali Ghoz; Matthew L Broadhead; John Morley; Shawn Tavares; David McDonald
Journal:  Orthop Rev (Pavia)       Date:  2014-03-31

Review 9.  Modular Stems: Advantages and Current Role in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty.

Authors:  Chan-Woo Park; Seung-Jae Lim; Youn-Soo Park
Journal:  Hip Pelvis       Date:  2018-09-04

10.  Controlled fracture of the medial wall versus structural autograft with bulk femoral head to increase cup coverage by host bone for total hip arthroplasty in osteoarthritis secondary to developmental dysplasia of the hip: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Ping Mou; Kai Liao; Hui-Lin Chen; Jing Yang
Journal:  J Orthop Surg Res       Date:  2020-11-26       Impact factor: 2.359

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.