Literature DB >> 14714242

Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Anneli Peolsson1, Rune Hedlund, Ludek Vavruch.   

Abstract

In a prospective randomised study with a 2-year follow-up, 103 patients were randomised to anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) with a cervical carbon-fibre intervertebral fusion cage (CIFC) or the Cloward procedure (CP). The purpose of the present study was to report predictors for fusion and also to investigate the importance of radiological variables for the clinical outcome. Gender, age, smoking habits, disc height, segmental kyphosis and type of surgical procedure were used as independent (before surgery) variables in a multiple regression model. Male gender, one-level surgery and CP treatment were significant predictors of fusion and explained 14% of the variability of fusion status at follow-up. Number of levels operated on, however, did not influence the clinical outcome. Fifty-two per cent of the women and 17% of the men in the CIFC group, and 25% of the women and 8% of the men in the CP group, had pseudarthrosis. Although patients with a healed fusion had significantly less pain intensity than patients with pseudarthrosis, radiological variables explained only 4% of the variability of pain at follow-up. Apart from a significant correlation between preoperative kyphosis and neck disability index at follow-up, no significant correlation between either postoperative kyphosis or preoperative or postoperative disc height and clinical outcome was found. Neither degree of segmental kyphosis nor disc height was different between patients with healed fusion and pseudarthrosis. One can conclude that male gender and type of surgery were significant predictors for a healed fusion and that pseudarthrosis affected outcome. In contrast to the commonly held view based mainly on theoretical considerations, no effect on clinical outcome could be demonstrated for segmental kyphosis and disc height at follow-up. Overall, the study shows that the importance of radiological factors as predictors for fusion as well as clinical outcome is limited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14714242      PMCID: PMC3468143          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-003-0627-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  24 in total

1.  Heterogeneity in growth and differentiation characteristics in male and female satellite cells isolated from turkey lines with different growth rates.

Authors:  S G Velleman; X Liu; K E Nestor; D C McFarland
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol A Mol Integr Physiol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.320

2.  Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression.

Authors:  Alan S Hilibrand; Mark A Fye; Sanford E Emery; Mark A Palumbo; Henry H Bohlman
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 3.468

3.  Is the efficacy of the Cloward procedure overestimated? Technique of evaluation affects the outcome.

Authors:  D Javid; R Hedlund; L Vavruch; W Leszniewski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion.

Authors:  T Andersen; F B Christensen; M Laursen; K Høy; E S Hansen; C Bünger
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for isometric neck strength.

Authors:  A Peolsson; B Oberg; R Hedlund
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2001

6.  Prospective radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications of single solid rod instrumented anterior spinal fusion in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

Authors:  F A Sweet; L G Lenke; K H Bridwell; K M Blanke; J Whorton
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  Outcome and complications of long fusions to the sacrum in adult spine deformity: luque-galveston, combined iliac and sacral screws, and sacral fixation.

Authors:  Arash Emami; Vedat Deviren; Sigurd Berven; Jason A Smith; Serena S Hu; David S Bradford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-04-01       Impact factor: 3.468

8.  Gender- and age-related differences in osteoclast formation from circulating precursors.

Authors:  M Jevon; A Sabokbar; Y Fujikawa; T Hirayama; S D Neale; J Wass; N A Athanasou
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.286

9.  Combined magnetic fields accelerate and increase spine fusion: a double-blind, randomized, placebo controlled study.

Authors:  Raymond J Linovitz; Mini Pathria; Mark Bernhardt; Daniel Green; Melvin D Law; Robert A McGuire; Pasquale X Montesano; Glen Rechtine; Richard M Salib; James T Ryaby; Joel S Faden; Regina Ponder; Larry R Muenz; Frank P Magee; Steven A Garfin
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-07-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  9 in total

1.  Interobservational variation in determining fusion rates in anterior cervical discectomy and fusion procedures.

Authors:  Kostas N Fountas; Eftychia Z Kapsalaki; Betsy E Smith; Leonidas G Nikolakakos; Charles H Richardson; Hugh F Smisson; Joe S Robinson; David C Parish
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2006-06-24       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 2.  Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Authors:  Anne F Mannion; Achim Elfering
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Michael Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2007-12-13       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  The association between cervical focal kyphosis and myelopathy severity in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy before surgery.

Authors:  Bingxuan Wu; Baoge Liu; Dacheng Sang; Wei Cui; Dian Wang
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2021-02-27       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Risk Factors for Medical and Surgical Complications after 1-2-Level Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion Procedures.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Brittany E Haws; Benjamin Khechen; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kelly H Yom; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2020-06-30

6.  Polyetheretherketone (PEEK) Spacers for Anterior Cervical Fusion: A Retrospective Comparative Effectiveness Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Johannes Lemcke; Ferass Al-Zain; Ullrich Meier; Olaf Suess
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2011-10-07

7.  Dimensions Underlying Measures of Disability, Personal Factors, and Health Status in Cervical Radiculopathy: A Cross-Sectional Study.

Authors:  Marie Halvorsen; Marie Kierkegaard; Karin Harms-Ringdahl; Anneli Peolsson; Åsa Dedering
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 1.889

8.  Empty polyetheretherketone (PEEK) cages in anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion (ACDF) show slow radiographic fusion that reduces clinical improvement: results from the prospective multicenter "PIERCE-PEEK" study.

Authors:  Olaf Suess; Martin Schomaker; Mario Cabraja; Marco Danne; Theodoros Kombos; Michael Hanna
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2017-04-28

9.  Clinical predictive modelling of post-surgical recovery in individuals with cervical radiculopathy: a machine learning approach.

Authors:  Bernard X W Liew; Anneli Peolsson; David Rugamer; Johanna Wibault; Hakan Löfgren; Asa Dedering; Peter Zsigmond; Deborah Falla
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-10-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.