Literature DB >> 18084782

Predictive factors for long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion: a multivariate data analysis.

Anneli Peolsson1, Michael Peolsson2,3.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective randomized study to investigate predictive factors for short- and long-term outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion (ACDF) as measured by current pain intensity on the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) and by disability using the Neck Disability Index (NDI). Current understanding about how preoperative and short-term outcome data predict long-term outcome is sparse, and there are few studies involving analysis of short-term follow-up using multivariate approaches with quantification of the relative importance of each variable studied. A total of 95 patients were randomly allocated for ACDF with the cervical intervertebral fusion cage or the Cloward procedure. The mean follow-up time was 19 months (range 12-24) for short-term follow-up and 76 months (range 56-94 months) for long-term. Background factors, radiologically detected findings, physiological measurements, treatment type, pain, and disability were used as potential predictors. Multivariate statistical analysis by projection to latent structures was used to investigate predictors of importance for short- and long-term outcome of ACDF. A "preoperative" low disability and pain intensity, non-smoking status, male sex, good hand strength, and an active range of motion (AROM) in the neck were significant predictors for good short- and long-term outcomes. The short-term outcome data were better at predicting long-term outcome than were baseline data. Radiologically detected findings and surgical technique used were mainly insignificant as predictors. We suggest that the inclusion criteria for ACDF should be based on a bio-psycho-social model including NDI. NDI may also be regarded as an important outcome measurement in evaluation of ACDF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18084782      PMCID: PMC2270379          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0560-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  30 in total

1.  Outcome scores in degenerative cervical disc surgery.

Authors:  B Zoëga; J Kärrholm; B Lind
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for hand strength.

Authors:  A Peolsson; R Hedlund; B Oberg
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.912

3.  Prognostic factors for perceived pain and function at one-year follow-up in primary care patients with neck pain.

Authors:  G Kjellman; E Skargren; B Oberg
Journal:  Disabil Rehabil       Date:  2002-05-10       Impact factor: 3.033

4.  Graphic representation of pain.

Authors:  J Scott; E C Huskisson
Journal:  Pain       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 6.961

5.  Predictive factors for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Rune Hedlund; Ludek Vavruch; Birgitta Oberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2003-04-02       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Is the efficacy of the Cloward procedure overestimated? Technique of evaluation affects the outcome.

Authors:  D Javid; R Hedlund; L Vavruch; W Leszniewski
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.134

7.  Intra- and inter-tester reliability and reference values for isometric neck strength.

Authors:  A Peolsson; B Oberg; R Hedlund
Journal:  Physiother Res Int       Date:  2001

8.  Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Rune Hedlund; Ludek Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Age- and sex-specific reference values of a test of neck muscle endurance.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Cecilia Almkvist; Camilla Dahlberg; Sara Lindqvist; Susanne Pettersson
Journal:  J Manipulative Physiol Ther       Date:  2007 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 1.437

10.  A prospective randomized comparison between the cloward procedure and a carbon fiber cage in the cervical spine: a clinical and radiologic study.

Authors:  Ludek Vavruch; Rune Hedlund; Davood Javid; Waclaw Leszniewski; Adel Shalabi
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 3.468

View more
  23 in total

1.  Cervical radiculopathy: a review.

Authors:  John M Caridi; Matthias Pumberger; Alexander P Hughes
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2011-09-09

2.  Individual factors associated with neck disability in patients with cervical radiculopathy scheduled for surgery: a study on physical impairments, psychosocial factors, and life style habits.

Authors:  Johanna Wibault; Birgitta öberg; Åsa Dedering; Håkan Löfgren; Peter Zsigmond; Liselott Persson; Anneli Peolsson
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2013-10-24       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Relationship between depression and clinical outcome following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Dane Moran; Thomas Kostowski; Risheng Xu; Rory Goodwin; Benjamin Elder; Seba Ramhmdani; Ali Bydon
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2017-06

4.  Anterior cervical discectomy with fusion in patients with cervical disc degeneration: a prospective outcome study of 258 patients (181 fused with autologous bone graft and 77 fused with a PEEK cage).

Authors:  Bjarne Lied; Paal Andre Roenning; Jarle Sundseth; Eirik Helseth
Journal:  BMC Surg       Date:  2010-03-21       Impact factor: 2.102

5.  Clinical and radiographic parameters that distinguish between the best and worst outcomes of scoliosis surgery for adults.

Authors:  Justin S Smith; Christopher I Shaffrey; Steven D Glassman; Leah Y Carreon; Frank J Schwab; Virginie Lafage; Vincent Arlet; Kai-Ming G Fu; Keith H Bridwell
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-10-18       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Cervical radiculopathy.

Authors:  Sravisht Iyer; Han Jo Kim
Journal:  Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med       Date:  2016-09

7.  Risk Factors Associated With Failure to Reach Minimal Clinically Important Difference in Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Authors:  Ankur S Narain; Fady Y Hijji; Benjamin Khechen; Brittany E Haws; Dil V Patel; Daniel D Bohl; Kelly H Yom; Krishna T Kudaravalli; Kern Singh
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-06-30

8.  Validating the VR-12 Physical Function Instrument After Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with SF-12, PROMIS, and NDI.

Authors:  Nathaniel W Jenkins; James M Parrish; Michael T Nolte; Nadia M Hrynewycz; Thomas S Brundage; Kern Singh
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2020-11-09

9.  A role for motor and somatosensory evoked potentials during anterior cervical discectomy and fusion for patients without myelopathy: Analysis of 57 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Risheng Xu; Eva K Ritzl; Mohammed Sait; Daniel M Sciubba; Jean-Paul Wolinsky; Timothy F Witham; Ziya L Gokaslan; Ali Bydon
Journal:  Surg Neurol Int       Date:  2011-09-30

10.  Letter to the Editor: Cervical Paraspinal Muscle Fatty Degeneration is Not Associated with Muscle Cross-Sectional Area: Qualitative Assessment is Preferable for Cervical Sarcopenia.

Authors:  Fevziye Ünsal Malas; Murat Kara; Levent Özçakar
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2021-08-01       Impact factor: 4.755

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.