Literature DB >> 16320033

Predictors of surgical outcome and their assessment.

Anne F Mannion1, Achim Elfering.   

Abstract

The relatively high rate of failed back surgery has prompted the search for "risk factors" to predict the result of spinal surgery in a given individual. However, the literature reveals few unequivocal predictors and they often explain a relatively low proportion of variance in outcome. This suggests that we have a long way to go before being able to rest easily, having refused someone surgery on the basis of unfavourable baseline characteristics. The best recommendation is to ensure, firstly, that the indication for surgery is absolutely clear-cut (i.e. that surgically remediable pathology exists) and then to consider the various factors that may influence the "typical" outcome. Consistent risk factors for a poor outcome regarding return-to-work include long-term sick leave/receipt of disability benefit. Hence, every effort should be made to keep the individual in the workforce, despite the ongoing symptoms and plans for surgery. In patients with a particularly heavy job, consultation with occupational physicians might later ease the patient's way back into the workplace. Patients with degenerative disorders and/or comorbidity should be counselled that few of them will have complete/lasting pain relief or a complete return to pre-morbid function. Patients with a high level of distress may benefit from psychological treatment, before and/or accompanying the surgical treatment. The opportunity (time), encouragement (education and positive messages), and resources (referral to appropriate support services) to modify risk factors that are indeed modifiable should be offered, and realistic expectations should be discussed with the patient before the decision to operate is made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16320033      PMCID: PMC3454547          DOI: 10.1007/s00586-005-1045-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Spine J        ISSN: 0940-6719            Impact factor:   3.134


  83 in total

1.  Secondary gain influences the outcome of lumbar but not cervical disc surgery.

Authors:  G J Kaptain; C I Shaffrey; T D Alden; J N Young; E R Laws; R Whitehill
Journal:  Surg Neurol       Date:  1999-09

Review 2.  Condition-specific outcome measures for low back pain. Part I: validation.

Authors:  U Müller; M S Duetz; C Roeder; C G Greenough
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-03-17       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Assessing the responsiveness of functional scales to clinical change: an analogy to diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  R A Deyo; R M Centor
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1986

4.  Presurgical biopsychosocial factors predict multidimensional patient: outcomes of interbody cage lumbar fusion.

Authors:  Rick A LaCaille; M Scott DeBerard; Kevin S Masters; Alan L Colledge; William Bacon
Journal:  Spine J       Date:  2005 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.166

5.  Discographic pain report. Influence of psychological factors.

Authors:  A R Block; H Vanharanta; D D Ohnmeiss; R D Guyer
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1996-02-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  Instrumented posterolateral lumbar fusion. Results and comparison with anterior interbody fusion.

Authors:  C G Greenough; M D Peterson; S Hadlow; R D Fraser
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1998-02-15       Impact factor: 3.468

7.  The risk of "getting worse" after lumbar microdiscectomy.

Authors:  Tore K Solberg; Oystein P Nygaard; Kristin Sjaavik; Dag Hofoss; Tor Ingebrigtsen
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-05-06       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  The Modified Somatic Perception Questionnaire (MSPQ).

Authors:  C J Main
Journal:  J Psychosom Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 3.006

9.  Psychological distress deteriorates the subjective outcome of lumbosacral fusion. A prospective study.

Authors:  J Van Susante; D Van de Schaaf; P Pavlov
Journal:  Acta Orthop Belg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 0.500

10.  Failed back surgery syndrome: 5-year follow-up in 102 patients undergoing repeated operation.

Authors:  R B North; J N Campbell; C S James; M K Conover-Walker; H Wang; S Piantadosi; J D Rybock; D M Long
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 4.654

View more
  51 in total

1.  Health-related quality-of-life status in Veterans with spinal disorders.

Authors:  Maxwell Boakye; Ryan Moore; Maiying Kong; Stephen L Skirboll; Robert T Arrigo
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2012-02-05       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 2.  Exploring the expectation-actuality discrepancy: a systematic review of the impact of preoperative expectations on satisfaction and patient reported outcomes in spinal surgery.

Authors:  Christopher D Witiw; Alireza Mansouri; Francois Mathieu; Farshad Nassiri; Jetan H Badhiwala; Richard G Fessler
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2016-04-07       Impact factor: 3.042

Review 3.  Development of appropriateness criteria for the surgical treatment of symptomatic lumbar degenerative spondylolisthesis (LDS).

Authors:  A F Mannion; V Pittet; F Steiger; J-P Vader; H-J Becker; F Porchet
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-04-24       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Biopsychosocial factors predict quality of life in thoracolumbar spine surgery.

Authors:  Dean A Tripp; Edward Abraham; Maude Lambert; Kate Wagg; Erin Bigney; Eden Daly; Phylicia Verreault; Neil Manson
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 4.147

5.  Predictors of clinical outcome following lumbar disc surgery: the value of historical, physical examination, and muscle function variables.

Authors:  Jeffrey J Hebert; Julie M Fritz; Shane L Koppenhaver; Anne Thackeray; Per Kjaer
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-04-04       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Investigating and predicting early lumbar spine surgery outcomes.

Authors:  Saddam F Kanaan; Paul M Arnold; Douglas C Burton; Hung-Wen Yeh; Lindsay Loyd; Neena K Sharma
Journal:  J Allied Health       Date:  2015

7.  Criteria for failure and worsening after surgery for lumbar disc herniation: a multicenter observational study based on data from the Norwegian Registry for Spine Surgery.

Authors:  David A T Werner; Margreth Grotle; Sasha Gulati; Ivar M Austevoll; Greger Lønne; Øystein P Nygaard; Tore K Solberg
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2017-06-14       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 8.  Money matters: exploiting the data from outcomes research for quality improvement initiatives.

Authors:  Franco M Impellizzeri; Mario Bizzini; Michael Leunig; Nicola A Maffiuletti; Anne F Mannion
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 3.134

9.  Depressive symptoms during rehabilitation period predict poor outcome of lumbar spinal stenosis surgery: a two-year perspective.

Authors:  Sanna Sinikallio; Soili M Lehto; Timo Aalto; Olavi Airaksinen; Heikki Kröger; Heimo Viinamäki
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2010-07-06       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  The association between Modic changes and pain during 1-year follow-up in patients with lumbar radicular pain.

Authors:  Elina Iordanova Schistad; Ansgar Espeland; Lars Jørgen Rygh; Cecilie Røe; Johannes Gjerstad
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 2.199

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.