Literature DB >> 11805659

Increased rate of arthrodesis with strut grafting after multilevel anterior cervical decompression.

Alan S Hilibrand1, Mark A Fye, Sanford E Emery, Mark A Palumbo, Henry H Bohlman.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: Reconstruction techniques after multilevel anterior cervical decompression were retrospectively compared.
OBJECTIVE: To compare radiographic and clinical outcomes of multiple interbody grafting with strut grafting. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Previous studies have reported lower fusion rates for anterior cervical decompressions reconstructed with multiple interbody grafts as opposed to a single strut graft, although these techniques have never been directly compared in a consecutive series of patients who underwent surgery by a single surgeon.
METHODS: Over a 20-year period, 190 patients underwent anterior cervical decompression and autogenous grafting without internal fixation and were followed for an average of 68 months. There were 98 two-level and 33 three-level discectomies with interbody grafting. These were compared with 16 one-level, 21 two-level, 20 three-level, and 2 four-level corpectomies with strut grafting. Radiographic and clinical outcomes were compared between the groups by chi2 and rank-sum analysis, respectively.
RESULTS: Of the 59 patients who underwent strut grafting, 55 achieved a solid arthrodesis (93%), as compared with 87 of the 131 patients who underwent multiple interbody grafting (66%) (P = 0.0002). There were six cases of graft displacement or extrusion among the 59 patients who had strut grafts, as compared with no graft-related complications among the 131 patients who had interbody grafts (P < 0.0001). More "good" and "excellent" clinical outcomes were found among patients who underwent strut-grafting (88% vs 84%), although the difference was not statistically significant (P = 0.73). However, patients with a pseudarthrosis had significantly poorer clinical outcomes (P < 0.0001).
CONCLUSIONS: A much higher fusion rate was achieved after corpectomy and strut grafting than after multilevel discectomy and interbody grafting. Although there were strut graft-related complications, four of these six complications occurred among patients who had a postlaminectomy kyphosis. Because pseudarthrosis resulted in poorer clinical outcomes, strut grafting should be considered after multilevel anterior cervical decompression to increase the likelihood of successful fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805659     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201150-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  27 in total

1.  Comparative analysis of complications of different reconstructive techniques following anterior decompression for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Min Qi; Huajiang Chen; Lili Yang; Xinwei Wang; Guodong Shi; Rui Gao; Ce Wang; Wen Yuan
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-05-29       Impact factor: 3.134

2.  Noncontiguous anterior decompression and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a prospective randomized control clinical study.

Authors:  Xiao-Feng Lian; Jian-Guang Xu; Bing-Fang Zeng; Wei Zhou; Wei-Qing Kong; Tie-Sheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  Surgical approach to cervical spondylotic myelopathy on the basis of radiological patterns of compression: prospective analysis of 129 cases.

Authors:  Mihir R Bapat; Kshitij Chaudhary; Amit Sharma; Vinod Laheri
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2008-10-23       Impact factor: 3.134

4.  Efficacy of multilevel anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus corpectomy and fusion for multilevel cervical spondylotic myelopathy: a minimum 5-year follow-up study.

Authors:  Kyung-Jin Song; Kwang-Bok Lee; Ji-Hoon Song
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-04-18       Impact factor: 3.134

5.  Anterior approaches for cervical spondylotic myelopathy: which? When? How?

Authors:  Sanford E Emery
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2015-02-05       Impact factor: 3.134

6.  Diagnosing cervical fusion: a comprehensive literature review.

Authors:  Nanin Sethi; James Devney; Holly L Steiner; K Daniel Riew
Journal:  Asian Spine J       Date:  2008-12-31

7.  Prediction of fusion and importance of radiological variables for the outcome of anterior cervical decompression and fusion.

Authors:  Anneli Peolsson; Rune Hedlund; Ludek Vavruch
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2004-01-09       Impact factor: 3.134

8.  [Multilevel segmental interbody fusion versus vertebral body replacement: comparison of two operative methods].

Authors:  D Daentzer; N Bianchi; D-K Böker; W Deinsberger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  Segmental anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion with preservation of middle vertebrae in the surgical management of 4-level cervical spondylotic myelopathy.

Authors:  Zhonghai Li; Zhenggang Guo; Shuxun Hou; Yantao Zhao; Hongbin Zhong; Shunzhi Yu; Tiesheng Hou
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 3.134

10.  Anterior Cervical Corpectomy with free vascularized fibular graft versus multilevel discectomy and grafting for Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy.

Authors:  Ahmed Saleh Shaker; Ahmad I Addosooki; Mohamed Alam El-Deen
Journal:  Int J Spine Surg       Date:  2015-11-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.