PURPOSE: Intervertebral discs exhibit time-dependent deformation (creep), which could influence the relation between applied stress and intradiscal pressure. This study investigates the effect of prolonged dynamic loading on intradiscal pressure, disc height and compressive stiffness, and examines their mutual relationships. METHODS: Fifteen caprine lumbar discs with 5 mm of vertebral bone on either side were compressed by 1 Hz sinusoidal load for 4.5 h. After preload, 'High' (130 ± 20 N) or 'Low' (50 ± 10 N) loads were alternated every half hour. Continuous intradiscal pressure measurement was performed with a pressure transducer needle. RESULTS: Each disc showed a linear relationship between axial compression and intradiscal pressure (R (2) > 0.91). The intercept of linear regression analysis declined over time, but the gradient remained constant. Disc height changes were correlated to intradiscal pressure changes (R (2) > 0.98): both decreased during High loading, and increased during Low loading. In contrast, compressive stiffness increased during High loading, and was inversely related to intradiscal pressure and disc height. CONCLUSIONS: Intradiscal pressure is influenced by recent loading due to fluid flow. The correlations found in this study suggest that intradiscal pressure is important for disc height and axial compliance. These findings are relevant for mechanobiology studies, nucleus replacements, finite element models, and ex vivo organ culture systems.
PURPOSE: Intervertebral discs exhibit time-dependent deformation (creep), which could influence the relation between applied stress and intradiscal pressure. This study investigates the effect of prolonged dynamic loading on intradiscal pressure, disc height and compressive stiffness, and examines their mutual relationships. METHODS: Fifteen caprine lumbar discs with 5 mm of vertebral bone on either side were compressed by 1 Hz sinusoidal load for 4.5 h. After preload, 'High' (130 ± 20 N) or 'Low' (50 ± 10 N) loads were alternated every half hour. Continuous intradiscal pressure measurement was performed with a pressure transducer needle. RESULTS: Each disc showed a linear relationship between axial compression and intradiscal pressure (R (2) > 0.91). The intercept of linear regression analysis declined over time, but the gradient remained constant. Disc height changes were correlated to intradiscal pressure changes (R (2) > 0.98): both decreased during High loading, and increased during Low loading. In contrast, compressive stiffness increased during High loading, and was inversely related to intradiscal pressure and disc height. CONCLUSIONS: Intradiscal pressure is influenced by recent loading due to fluid flow. The correlations found in this study suggest that intradiscal pressure is important for disc height and axial compliance. These findings are relevant for mechanobiology studies, nucleus replacements, finite element models, and ex vivo organ culture systems.
Authors: Albert J van der Veen; Margriet Mullender; Theo H Smit; Idsart Kingma; Jaap H van Dieën Journal: Spine (Phila Pa 1976) Date: 2005-09-15 Impact factor: 3.468
Authors: Johannes L Bron; Albert J van der Veen; Marco N Helder; Barend J van Royen; Theodoor H Smit Journal: Eur Spine J Date: 2010-04-17 Impact factor: 3.134
Authors: Cornelis P L Paul; Tom Schoorl; Hendrik A Zuiderbaan; Behrouz Zandieh Doulabi; Albert J van der Veen; Peter M van de Ven; Theo H Smit; Barend J van Royen; Marco N Helder; Margriet G Mullender Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Paola Bermudez-Lekerika; Katherine B Crump; Sofia Tseranidou; Andrea Nüesch; Exarchos Kanelis; Ahmad Alminnawi; Laura Baumgartner; Estefano Muñoz-Moya; Roger Compte; Francesco Gualdi; Leonidas G Alexopoulos; Liesbet Geris; Karin Wuertz-Kozak; Christine L Le Maitre; Jérôme Noailly; Benjamin Gantenbein Journal: Front Cell Dev Biol Date: 2022-06-29
Authors: Samantha L Marshall; Timothy D Jacobsen; Erik Emsbo; Archana Murali; Kevin Anton; Jessica Z Liu; Helen H Lu; Nadeen O Chahine Journal: ACS Biomater Sci Eng Date: 2021-11-29
Authors: Benjamin Gantenbein; Svenja Illien-Jünger; Samantha C W Chan; Jochen Walser; Lisbet Haglund; Stephen J Ferguson; James C Iatridis; Sibylle Grad Journal: Curr Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2015 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Sultana Monira Hussain; Donna M Urquhart; Yuanyuan Wang; Jonathan E Shaw; Dianna J Magliano; Anita E Wluka; Flavia M Cicuttini Journal: Arthritis Res Ther Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 5.156
Authors: Cornelis P L Paul; Magda de Graaf; Arno Bisschop; Roderick M Holewijn; Peter M van de Ven; Barend J van Royen; Margriet G Mullender; Theodoor H Smit; Marco N Helder Journal: PLoS One Date: 2017-04-06 Impact factor: 3.240