Literature DB >> 14704015

Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding.

Brian T Crabb1, Veronica J Dark.   

Abstract

In two experiments, we examined whether the encoding processes leading to perceptual implicit memory satisfied the intentionality and load insensitivity criteria for automaticity. Whether participants intended to process words or digits, in displays containing both, was manipulated in Experiment 1. Results showed an effect of intention on a subsequent perceptual identification task and a recognition task. Load (one, two, and four words) and exposure duration (1,000, 600, and 200 msec) at encoding were manipulated in Experiment 2. Recognition was affected by both variables, but performance on the perceptual identification task was affected only by load. In both experiments, the results showed that controlled (intentional, load-sensitive) processing of words at encoding is essential for later perceptual implicit memory. That is, the encoding processes leading to perceptual implicit memory fail both criteria of automaticity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14704015     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196121

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  The role of spatial attention in visual word processing.

Authors:  R S McCann; C L Folk; J C Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1992-11       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention.

Authors:  K J Hawley; W A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Word-identification priming for ignored and attended words.

Authors:  M Stone; S L Ladd; C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1998-06

4.  Levels of processing and selective attention effects on encoding in memory.

Authors:  S Bentin; M Moscovitch; O Nirhod
Journal:  Acta Psychol (Amst)       Date:  1998-04

5.  Repetition priming of words and pseudowords in divided attention and in amnesia.

Authors:  M E Smith; M Oscar-Berman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 3.051

6.  Divided attention and indirect memory tests.

Authors:  N W Mulligan; M Hartman
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1996-07

7.  Is there implicit memory without attention? A reexamination of task demands in Eich's (1984) procedure.

Authors:  N L Wood; M A Stadler; N Cowan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1997-11

8.  Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.

Authors:  W von Hippel; C Hawkins
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1994-11

9.  Memory for unattended events: remembering with and without awareness.

Authors:  E Eich
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1984-03

10.  Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests.

Authors:  M S Weldon
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  4 in total

1.  The rise and fall of priming: how visual exposure shapes cortical representations of objects.

Authors:  Laure Zago; Mark J Fenske; Elissa Aminoff; Moshe Bar
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2005-02-16       Impact factor: 5.357

2.  Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction.

Authors:  Karin Foerde; Barbara J Knowlton; Russell A Poldrack
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2006-07-25       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The effects of divided attention on auditory priming.

Authors:  Neil W Mulligan; Marquinn Duke; Angela W Cooper
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2007-09

4.  Not all identification tasks are born equal: testing the involvement of production processes in perceptual identification and lexical decision.

Authors:  Pietro Spataro; Daniele Saraulli; Neil W Mulligan; Vincenzo Cestari; Marco Costanzi; Clelia Rossi-Arnaud
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2017-03-11
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.