Literature DB >> 16868087

Modulation of competing memory systems by distraction.

Karin Foerde1, Barbara J Knowlton, Russell A Poldrack.   

Abstract

Different forms of learning and memory depend on functionally and anatomically separable neural circuits [Squire, L. R. (1992) Psychol. Rev. 99, 195-231]. Declarative memory relies on a medial temporal lobe system, whereas habit learning relies on the striatum [Cohen, N. J. & Eichenbaum, H. (1993) Memory, Amnesia, and the Hippocampal System (MIT Press, Cambridge, MA)]. How these systems are engaged to optimize learning and behavior is not clear. Here, we present results from functional neuroimaging showing that the presence of a demanding secondary task during learning modulates the degree to which subjects solve a problem using either declarative memory or habit learning. Dual-task conditions did not reduce accuracy but reduced the amount of declarative learning about the task. Medial temporal lobe activity was correlated with task performance and declarative knowledge after learning under single-task conditions, whereas performance was correlated with striatal activity after dual-task learning conditions. These results demonstrate a fundamental difference in these memory systems in their sensitivity to concurrent distraction. The results are consistent with the notion that declarative and habit learning compete to mediate task performance, and they suggest that the presence of distraction can bias this competition. These results have implications for learning in multitask situations, suggesting that, even if distraction does not decrease the overall level of learning, it can result in the acquisition of knowledge that can be applied less flexibly in new situations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16868087      PMCID: PMC1544246          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.0602659103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  31 in total

1.  When zero is not zero: the problem of ambiguous baseline conditions in fMRI.

Authors:  C E Stark; L R Squire
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-10-09       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding.

Authors:  Brian T Crabb; Veronica J Dark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

4.  Direct comparison of neural systems mediating conscious and unconscious skill learning.

Authors:  Daniel B Willingham; Joanna Salidis; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 5.  Advances in functional and structural MR image analysis and implementation as FSL.

Authors:  Stephen M Smith; Mark Jenkinson; Mark W Woolrich; Christian F Beckmann; Timothy E J Behrens; Heidi Johansen-Berg; Peter R Bannister; Marilena De Luca; Ivana Drobnjak; David E Flitney; Rami K Niazy; James Saunders; John Vickers; Yongyue Zhang; Nicola De Stefano; J Michael Brady; Paul M Matthews
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory.

Authors:  F I Craik; R Govoni; M Naveh-Benjamin; N D Anderson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1996-06

7.  Dissociable properties of memory systems: differences in the flexibility of declarative and nondeclarative knowledge.

Authors:  P J Reber; B J Knowlton; L R Squire
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Interaction between the human hippocampus and the caudate nucleus during route recognition.

Authors:  Nicol C Voermans; Karl Magnus Petersson; Leonie Daudey; Bernd Weber; Karel P Van Spaendonck; Hubertus P H Kremer; Guillén Fernández
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2004-08-05       Impact factor: 17.173

9.  Human midbrain sensitivity to cognitive feedback and uncertainty during classification learning.

Authors:  A R Aron; D Shohamy; J Clark; C Myers; M A Gluck; R A Poldrack
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Cortico-striatal contributions to feedback-based learning: converging data from neuroimaging and neuropsychology.

Authors:  D Shohamy; C E Myers; S Grossman; J Sage; M A Gluck; R A Poldrack
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2004-03-10       Impact factor: 13.501

View more
  125 in total

Review 1.  The role of the basal ganglia in learning and memory: insight from Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Karin Foerde; Daphna Shohamy
Journal:  Neurobiol Learn Mem       Date:  2011-09-16       Impact factor: 2.877

2.  Expected value information improves financial risk taking across the adult life span.

Authors:  Gregory R Samanez-Larkin; Anthony D Wagner; Brian Knutson
Journal:  Soc Cogn Affect Neurosci       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 3.436

3.  Compensatory processing during rule-based category learning in older adults.

Authors:  Krishna L Bharani; Ken A Paller; Paul J Reber; Sandra Weintraub; Jorge Yanar; Robert G Morrison
Journal:  Neuropsychol Dev Cogn B Aging Neuropsychol Cogn       Date:  2015-09-30

4.  Visual statistical learning is related to natural language ability in adults: An ERP study.

Authors:  Jerome Daltrozzo; Samantha N Emerson; Joanne Deocampo; Sonia Singh; Marjorie Freggens; Lee Branum-Martin; Christopher M Conway
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.381

Review 5.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

Review 6.  Preservation of function in Parkinson's disease: what's learning got to do with it?

Authors:  Jeff A Beeler
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 7.  The Role of Habits in Anorexia Nervosa: Where We Are and Where to Go From Here?

Authors:  Blair Uniacke; B Timothy Walsh; Karin Foerde; Joanna Steinglass
Journal:  Curr Psychiatry Rep       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 5.285

8.  Dynamic cross-frequency couplings of local field potential oscillations in rat striatum and hippocampus during performance of a T-maze task.

Authors:  Adriano B L Tort; Mark A Kramer; Catherine Thorn; Daniel J Gibson; Yasuo Kubota; Ann M Graybiel; Nancy J Kopell
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  The Neuroscience of Goals and Behavior Change.

Authors:  Elliot T Berkman
Journal:  Consult Psychol J       Date:  2018-03

10.  Dissociating the contributions of independent corticostriatal systems to visual categorization learning through the use of reinforcement learning modeling and Granger causality modeling.

Authors:  Carol A Seger; Erik J Peterson; Corinna M Cincotta; Dan Lopez-Paniagua; Charles W Anderson
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-12-05       Impact factor: 6.556

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.