Literature DB >> 18035624

The effects of divided attention on auditory priming.

Neil W Mulligan1, Marquinn Duke, Angela W Cooper.   

Abstract

Traditional theorizing stresses the importance of attentional state during encoding for later memory, based primarily on research with explicit memory. Recent research has begun to investigate the role of attention in implicit memory but has focused almost exclusively on priming in the visual modality. The present experiments examined the effect of divided attention on auditory implicit memory, using auditory perceptual identification, word-stem completion and word-fragment completion. Participants heard study words under full attention conditions or while simultaneously carrying out a distractor task (the divided attention condition). In Experiment 1, a distractor task with low response frequency failed to disrupt later auditory priming (but diminished explicit memory as assessed with auditory recognition). In Experiment 2, a distractor task with greater response frequency disrupted priming on all three of the auditory priming tasks as well as the explicit test. These results imply that although auditory priming is less reliant on attention than explicit memory, it is still greatly affected by at least some divided-attention manipulations. These results are consistent with research using visual priming tasks and have relevance for hypotheses regarding attention and auditory priming.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 18035624     DOI: 10.3758/bf03193598

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  50 in total

1.  Visual encoding of patterns is subject to dual-task interference.

Authors:  R Dell'Acqua; P Jolicoeur
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-03

2.  Visual implicit memory deficit and developmental surface dyslexia: a case of early occipital damage.

Authors:  S Samuelsson; T R Bogges; T Karlsson
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 4.027

3.  Transfer across modality in perceptual implicit memory.

Authors:  D Blum; A P Yonelinas
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

4.  Priming within and across modalities: exploring the nature of rCBF increases and decreases.

Authors:  R D Badgaiyan; D L Schacter; N M Alpert
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Perceptual implicit memory relies on intentional, load-sensitive processing at encoding.

Authors:  Brian T Crabb; Veronica J Dark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2003-10

6.  Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention.

Authors:  K J Hawley; W A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

8.  Manipulation of attention at study affects an explicit but not an implicit test of memory.

Authors:  K F Szymanski; C M MacLeod
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  1996 Mar-Jun

9.  Brain regions associated with acquisition and retrieval of verbal episodic memory.

Authors:  T Shallice; P Fletcher; C D Frith; P Grasby; R S Frackowiak; R J Dolan
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1994-04-14       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  On the status of unconscious memory: Merikle and Reingold (1991) revisited.

Authors:  Christopher J Berry; David R Shanks; Richard N A Henson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  3 in total

1.  Cross-modal perceptual load: the impact of modality and individual differences.

Authors:  Rajwant Sandhu; Benjamin James Dyson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-12-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The effects of generation on auditory implicit memory.

Authors:  Ilana T Z Dew; Neil W Mulligan
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2008-09

3.  Effects of Divided Attention at Retrieval on Conceptual Implicit Memory.

Authors:  Matthew W Prull; Courtney Lawless; Helen M Marshall; Annabella T K Sherman
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2016-01-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.