Literature DB >> 8757494

Divided attention and indirect memory tests.

N W Mulligan1, M Hartman.   

Abstract

Attentional state during acquisition is an important determinant of performance on direct memory tests. In two experiments we investigated the effects of dividing attention during acquisition on conceptually driven and data-driven indirect memory tests. Subjects read a list of words with or without distraction. Memory for the words was later tested with an indirect memory test or a direct memory test that differed only in task instructions. In Experiment 1, the indirect test was category-exemplar production (a conceptually driven task) and the direct test was category-cued recall. In Experiment 2, the indirect test was word-fragment completion (a data-driven task) and the direct test was word-fragment cued recall. Dividing attention at encoding decreased performance on both direct memory tests. Of the indirect tests, category-exemplar production but not word-fragment completion was affected. The results indicate that conceptually driven indirect memory tests, like direct memory tests, are affected by divided attention, whereas data-driven indirect tests are not. These results are interpreted within the transfer-appropriate processing framework.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8757494     DOI: 10.3758/bf03200934

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  34 in total

1.  Effects of adult age and working memory on reasoning and spatial abilities.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; D R Mitchell; E Skovronek; R L Babcock
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  Long-term perceptual memory for briefly exposed words as a function of awareness and attention.

Authors:  K J Hawley; W A Johnston
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-08       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  Priming and multiple memory systems: perceptual mechanisms of implicit memory.

Authors:  D L Schacter
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 3.225

4.  Memory and age differences in spatial manipulation ability.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; D R Mitchell; R Palmon
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-12

5.  Structural and operational capacities in integrative spatial ability.

Authors:  T A Salthouse; D R Mitchell
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-03

Review 6.  Direct and indirect tests of memory for category exemplars in young and older adults.

Authors:  L L Light; S A Albertson
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1989-12

7.  Specific word transfer as a measure of processing in the word-superiority paradigm.

Authors:  C A Hayman; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1989-03

8.  Automatic versus intentional uses of memory: aging, attention, and control.

Authors:  J M Jennings; L L Jacoby
Journal:  Psychol Aging       Date:  1993-06

9.  Critical importance of exposure duration for affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized.

Authors:  J G Seamon; R L Marsh; N Brody
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 3.051

10.  Affective discrimination of stimuli that are not recognized: effects of shadowing, masking, and cerebral laterality.

Authors:  J G Seamon; N Brody; D M Kauff
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 3.051

View more
  34 in total

1.  Picture superiority in conceptual memory: dissociative effects of encoding and retrieval tasks.

Authors:  C J Vaidya; J D Gabrieli
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-10

2.  The effects of levels-of-processing and organization on conceptual implicit memory in the category exemplar production test.

Authors:  N W Mulligan; P S Guyer; A Beland
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-07

3.  Attentional requirements for object-location priming.

Authors:  G Musen; J Viola
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2000-12

4.  Effects of hearing words, imaging hearing words, and reading on auditory implicit and explicit memory tests.

Authors:  M Pilotti; D A Gallo; H L Roediger
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-12

5.  Perceptual implicit memory requires attentional encoding.

Authors:  B T Crabb; V J Dark
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1999-03

6.  On associations between computers and restaurants: rapid learning of new associations on a conceptual implicit memory test.

Authors:  K Srinivas; D Culp; S Rajaram
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2000-09

7.  Divided attention and prerecognition processing of spoken words and nonwords.

Authors:  W P Wallace; T R Shaffer; M D Amberg; V L Silvers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-12

8.  The effects of attention on perceptual implicit memory.

Authors:  S Rajaram; K Srinivas; S Travers
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-10

9.  Probing memory with conceptual cues at multiple retention intervals: a comparison of forgetting rates on implicit and explicit tests.

Authors:  Y Goshen-Gottstein; H Kempinsky
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03

Review 10.  The role of involuntary aware memory in the implicit stem and fragment completion tasks: a selective review.

Authors:  S Kinoshita
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.