Literature DB >> 14700258

Spatial variations of visual-auditory fusion areas.

Martine Godfroy1, Corinne Roumes, Pierre Dauchy.   

Abstract

The tolerance to spatial disparity between two synchronous visual and auditory components of a bimodal stimulus has been investigated in order to assess their respective contributions to perceptual fusion. The visual and auditory systems each have specific information-processing mechanisms, and provide different cues for scene perception, with the respective dominance of space for vision and of time for hearing. A broadband noise burst and a spot of light, 500 ms in duration, have been simultaneously presented to participants who had to judge whether these cues referred to a single spatial event. We examined the influence of (i) the range and the direction of spatial disparity between the visual and auditory components of a stimulation and (ii) the eccentricity of the bimodal stimulus in the observer's perceptual field. Size and shape properties of visual-auditory fusion areas have been determined in two dimensions. The greater the eccentricity within the perceptual field, the greater the dimension of these areas; however, this increase in size also depends on whether the direction of the disparity is vertical or horizontal. Furthermore, the relative location of visual and auditory signals significantly modifies the perception of unity in the vertical plane. The shape of the fusion areas, their variation in the field, and the perceptual result associated with the relative location of the visual and auditory components of the stimulus, concur towards a strong contribution of audition to visual-auditory fusion. The spatial ambiguity of the localisation capabilities of the auditory system may play a more essential role than accurate visual resolution in determining fusion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14700258     DOI: 10.1068/p3344

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  11 in total

1.  The role of spatial disparity and hemifields in audio-visual temporal order judgments.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-21       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Authors:  Daniel Sanabria; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Charles Spence
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-26       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency matters.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Comparison of congruence judgment and auditory localization tasks for assessing the spatial limits of visual capture.

Authors:  Adam K Bosen; Justin T Fleming; Sarah E Brown; Paul D Allen; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2016-11-04       Impact factor: 2.086

5.  Audition dominates vision in duration perception irrespective of salience, attention, and temporal discriminability.

Authors:  Laura Ortega; Emmanuel Guzman-Martinez; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  Atten Percept Psychophys       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Influence of age, spatial memory, and ocular fixation on localization of auditory, visual, and bimodal targets by human subjects.

Authors:  Marina S Dobreva; William E O'Neill; Gary D Paige
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Limits of Perceived Audio-Visual Spatial Coherence as Defined by Reaction Time Measurements.

Authors:  Hanne Stenzel; Jon Francombe; Philip J B Jackson
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-22       Impact factor: 4.677

8.  No effect of auditory-visual spatial disparity on temporal recalibration.

Authors:  Mirjam Keetels; Jean Vroomen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The interaction of vision and audition in two-dimensional space.

Authors:  Martine Godfroy-Cooper; Patrick M B Sandor; Joel D Miller; Robert B Welch
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-17       Impact factor: 4.677

10.  Causal Inference for Cross-Modal Action Selection: A Computational Study in a Decision Making Framework.

Authors:  Mehdi Daemi; Laurence R Harris; J Douglas Crawford
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 2.380

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.