Literature DB >> 24449005

Unmasking the dichoptic mask by sound: spatial congruency matters.

Yung-Hao Yang1, Su-Ling Yeh.   

Abstract

People tend to look toward where a sound occurs; however, the role of spatial congruency between sound and sight in the effect of sound facilitation on visual detection remains controversial. We propose that the role of spatial congruency depends on the reliability of the information provided by the facilitator; if it is relatively unreliable, adding spatially congruent information can help to unify different sensory inputs to compensate for this unreliability. To test this, we examine the influence of sound location on visual detection with a non-temporal task, presumably unfavorable for sound since it is better for temporal resolution, and predict that spatial congruency should matter in this situation. We used the continuous flash suppression paradigm that makes the visual stimuli invisible to keep the relationship of sound and sight opaque. The sound is on the same depth plane as the visual stimulus (the congruent condition) or on a different plane (the incongruent condition). The target was presented to one eye with luminance contrast gradually increased and continuously masked by flashed Mondrian masks presented to the other eye until the target was released from suppression. We found that sound facilitated visual detection (measured by released-from-suppression time) in the spatially congruent condition but not in the spatially incongruent condition. Together with previous findings in the literature, it is suggested that both task type and modality determine the reliability of the information for multisensory integration and thus determine whether spatial congruency is critical.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24449005     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-014-3820-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  46 in total

1.  Illusory sound shifts induced by the ventriloquist illusion evoke the mismatch negativity.

Authors:  Jeroen J Stekelenburg; Jean Vroomen; Beatrice de Gelder
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2004-03-11       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  The spread of attention across modalities and space in a multisensory object.

Authors:  Laura Busse; Kenneth C Roberts; Roy E Crist; Daniel H Weissman; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Continuous flash suppression reduces negative afterimages.

Authors:  Naotsugu Tsuchiya; Christof Koch
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-07-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  The spatial constraint in intersensory pairing: no role in temporal ventriloquism.

Authors:  Jean Vroomen; Mirjam Keetels
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2006-08       Impact factor: 3.332

5.  Phantom flashes caused by interactions across visual space.

Authors:  Garga Chatterjee; Daw-An Wu; Bhavin R Sheth
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  Olfaction modulates visual perception in binocular rivalry.

Authors:  Wen Zhou; Yi Jiang; Sheng He; Denise Chen
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 10.834

7.  Cortical responses to invisible objects in the human dorsal and ventral pathways.

Authors:  Fang Fang; Sheng He
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2005-09-04       Impact factor: 24.884

8.  Integration without awareness: expanding the limits of unconscious processing.

Authors:  Liad Mudrik; Assaf Breska; Dominique Lamy; Leon Y Deouell
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-05-09

9.  Closer in time when farther in space--spatial factors in audiovisual temporal integration.

Authors:  Toemme Noesselt; Robert Fendrich; Bjoern Bonath; Sascha Tyll; Hans-Jochen Heinze
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-08-29

10.  Intra- and cross-modal cuing of spatial attention: Time courses and mechanisms.

Authors:  Zhong-Lin Lu; Hennis Chi-Hang Tse; Barbara Anne Dosher; Luis A Lesmes; Christian Posner; Wilson Chu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-07-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more
  8 in total

1.  Role of consciousness in temporal integration of semantic information.

Authors:  Yung-Hao Yang; Yung-Hsuan Tien; Pei-Ling Yang; Su-Ling Yeh
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 3.282

2.  Peripheral visual localization is degraded by globally incongruent auditory-spatial attention cues.

Authors:  Jyrki Ahveninen; Grace Ingalls; Funda Yildirim; Finnegan J Calabro; Lucia M Vaina
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2019-06-14       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The Complex Interplay Between Multisensory Integration and Perceptual Awareness.

Authors:  O Deroy; N Faivre; C Lunghi; C Spence; M Aller; U Noppeney
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 2.286

4.  Suppressed visual looming stimuli are not integrated with auditory looming signals: Evidence from continuous flash suppression.

Authors:  Pieter Moors; Hanne Huygelier; Johan Wagemans; Lee de-Wit; Raymond van Ee
Journal:  Iperception       Date:  2015-03-17

Review 5.  Breaking continuous flash suppression: competing for consciousness on the pre-semantic battlefield.

Authors:  Surya Gayet; Stefan Van der Stigchel; Chris L E Paffen
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-05-23

6.  Frequent words do not break continuous flash suppression differently from infrequent or nonexistent words: implications for semantic processing of words in the absence of awareness.

Authors:  Tom Heyman; Pieter Moors
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Emotion in Chinese Words Could Not Be Extracted in Continuous Flash Suppression.

Authors:  Kaiwen Cheng; Aolin Ding; Lianfang Jiang; Han Tian; Hongmei Yan
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2019-09-12       Impact factor: 3.169

8.  Upper nasal hemifield location and nonspatial auditory tones accelerate visual detection during dichoptic viewing.

Authors:  Terhi Mustonen; Mikko Nuutinen; Lari Vainio; Jukka Häkkinen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-07-23       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.