Literature DB >> 16132965

Assessing the effect of visual and tactile distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion.

Daniel Sanabria1, Salvador Soto-Faraco, Charles Spence.   

Abstract

In this study we investigated the effect of the directional congruency of tactile, visual, or bimodal visuotactile apparent motion distractors on the perception of auditory apparent motion. Participants had to judge the direction in which an auditory apparent motion stream moved (left-to-right or right-to-left) while trying to ignore one of a range of distractor stimuli, including unimodal tactile or visual, bimodal visuotactile, and crossmodal (i.e., composed of one visual and one tactile stimulus) distractors. Significant crossmodal dynamic capture effects (i.e., better performance when the target and distractor stimuli moved in the same direction rather than in opposite directions) were demonstrated in all conditions. Bimodal distractors elicited more crossmodal dynamic capture than unimodal distractors, thus providing the first empirical demonstration of the effect of information presented simultaneously in two irrelevant sensory modalities on the perception of motion in a third (target) sensory modality. The results of a second experiment demonstrated that the capture effect reported in the crossmodal distractor condition was most probably attributable to the combined effect of the individual static distractors (i.e., to ventriloquism) rather than to any emergent property of crossmodal apparent motion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16132965     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2395-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  45 in total

1.  Evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging of crossmodal binding in the human heteromodal cortex.

Authors:  G A Calvert; R Campbell; M J Brammer
Journal:  Curr Biol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 10.834

Review 2.  On the neuronal basis for multisensory convergence: a brief overview.

Authors:  M Alex Meredith
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2002-06

3.  Sensory uncertainty governs the extent of audio-visual interaction.

Authors:  J Heron; D Whitaker; P V McGraw
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.886

Review 4.  Merging the senses into a robust percept.

Authors:  Marc O Ernst; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 20.229

5.  No direction-specific bimodal facilitation for audiovisual motion detection.

Authors:  David Alais; David Burr
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-04

6.  A comparison of auditory and visual apparent motion presented individually and with crossmodal moving distractors.

Authors:  Thomas Z Strybel; Argiro Vatakis
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 1.490

7.  Low-level integration of auditory and visual motion signals requires spatial co-localisation.

Authors:  Georg F Meyer; Sophie M Wuerger; Florian Röhrbein; Christoph Zetzsche
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-06       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  An interactive race model of divided attention.

Authors:  J T Mordkoff; S Yantis
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1991-05       Impact factor: 3.332

9.  Sensory specificity of apparent motion.

Authors:  P G Allen; P A Kolers
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 3.332

10.  Space coding in primate posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  F Bremmer; A Schlack; J R Duhamel; W Graf; G R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Tactual perception: a review of experimental variables and procedures.

Authors:  Alexandra M Fernandes; Pedro B Albuquerque
Journal:  Cogn Process       Date:  2012-06-06

2.  Effects of visual stimuli on temporal order judgments of unimanual finger stimuli.

Authors:  Satoshi Shibuya; Toshimitsu Takahashi; Shigeru Kitazawa
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-01-10       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  The COGs (context, object, and goals) in multisensory processing.

Authors:  Sanne ten Oever; Vincenzo Romei; Nienke van Atteveldt; Salvador Soto-Faraco; Micah M Murray; Pawel J Matusz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-03-01       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Rubber hand presentation modulates visuotactile interference effect especially in persons with high autistic traits.

Authors:  Makoto Wada; Masakazu Ide
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Crossmodal Postdiction: Conscious Perception as Revisionist History.

Authors:  Noelle R B Stiles; Armand R Tanguay; Shinsuke Shimojo
Journal:  J Percept Imaging       Date:  2021-09-24

6.  The role of spatiotemporal and spectral cues in segregating short sound events: evidence from auditory Ternus display.

Authors:  Qingcui Wang; Ming Bao; Lihan Chen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-10-20       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The leading sense: supramodal control of neurophysiological context by attention.

Authors:  Peter Lakatos; Monica N O'Connell; Annamaria Barczak; Aimee Mills; Daniel C Javitt; Charles E Schroeder
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 17.173

8.  When vision is not an option: children's integration of auditory and haptic information is suboptimal.

Authors:  Karin Petrini; Alicia Remark; Louise Smith; Marko Nardini
Journal:  Dev Sci       Date:  2014-02-25
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.