Literature DB >> 14691236

Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques.

Hao Fan1, Alan E Mark.   

Abstract

The use of classical molecular dynamics simulations, performed in explicit water, for the refinement of structural models of proteins generated ab initio or based on homology has been investigated. The study involved a test set of 15 proteins that were previously used by Baker and coworkers to assess the efficiency of the ROSETTA method for ab initio protein structure prediction. For each protein, four models generated using the ROSETTA procedure were simulated for periods of between 5 and 400 nsec in explicit solvent, under identical conditions. In addition, the experimentally determined structure and the experimentally derived structure in which the side chains of all residues had been deleted and then regenerated using the WHATIF program were simulated and used as controls. A significant improvement in the deviation of the model structures from the experimentally determined structures was observed in several cases. In addition, it was found that in certain cases in which the experimental structure deviated rapidly from the initial structure in the simulations, indicating internal strain, the structures were more stable after regenerating the side-chain positions. Overall, the results indicate that molecular dynamics simulations on a tens to hundreds of nanoseconds time scale are useful for the refinement of homology or ab initio models of small to medium-size proteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 14691236      PMCID: PMC2286528          DOI: 10.1110/ps.03381404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Protein Sci        ISSN: 0961-8368            Impact factor:   6.725


  34 in total

1.  Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction.

Authors:  C A Orengo; J E Bray; T Hubbard; L LoConte; I Sillitoe
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

2.  Sequence to structure alignment in comparative modeling using PrISM.

Authors:  A S Yang; B Honig
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

3.  Ab initio protein structure prediction of CASP III targets using ROSETTA.

Authors:  K T Simons; R Bonneau; I Ruczinski; D Baker
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  1999

4.  Protein modelling for all.

Authors:  N Guex; A Diemand; M C Peitsch
Journal:  Trends Biochem Sci       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 13.807

5.  Prospects for ab initio protein structural genomics.

Authors:  K T Simons; C Strauss; D Baker
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2001-03-09       Impact factor: 5.469

6.  2.1 and 1.8 A average C(alpha) RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and s15.

Authors:  M R Lee; D Baker; P A Kollman
Journal:  J Am Chem Soc       Date:  2001-02-14       Impact factor: 15.419

7.  Structural homology between the Rap30 DNA-binding domain and linker histone H5: implications for preinitiation complex assembly.

Authors:  C M Groft; S N Uljon; R Wang; M H Werner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-08-04       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Solution structure of the I gamma subdomain of the Mu end DNA-binding domain of phage Mu transposase.

Authors:  R T Clubb; S Schumacher; K Mizuuchi; A M Gronenborn; G M Clore
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

9.  Do aligned sequences share the same fold?

Authors:  R A Abagyan; S Batalov
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1997-10-17       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Large-scale protein structure modeling of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae genome.

Authors:  R Sánchez; A Sali
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-11-10       Impact factor: 11.205

View more
  62 in total

1.  Multiple templates-based homology modeling enhances structure quality of AT1 receptor: validation by molecular dynamics and antagonist docking.

Authors:  Pandian Sokkar; Shylajanaciyar Mohandass; Murugesan Ramachandran
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2010-10-06       Impact factor: 1.810

2.  Structural insights into human GPCR protein OA1: a computational perspective.

Authors:  Anirban Ghosh; Uddhavesh Sonavane; Sai Krishna Andhirka; Gopala Krishna Aradhyam; Rajendra Joshi
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2011-09-22       Impact factor: 1.810

3.  Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology-based protein structures.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Assessment of protein structure refinement in CASP9.

Authors:  Justin L MacCallum; Alberto Pérez; Michael J Schnieders; Lan Hua; Matthew P Jacobson; Ken A Dill
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2011-08-30

6.  Molecular dynamics simulations of bovine rhodopsin: influence of protonation states and different membrane-mimicking environments.

Authors:  Birgit Schlegel; Wolfgang Sippl; Hans-Dieter Höltje
Journal:  J Mol Model       Date:  2005-10-25       Impact factor: 1.810

7.  Validation of the 53A6 GROMOS force field.

Authors:  Chris Oostenbrink; Thereza A Soares; Nico F A van der Vegt; Wilfred F van Gunsteren
Journal:  Eur Biophys J       Date:  2005-04-01       Impact factor: 1.733

Review 8.  Advances in homology protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Zhexin Xiang
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.272

9.  Mimicking the action of GroEL in molecular dynamics simulations: application to the refinement of protein structures.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2006-02-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Symmetry-restrained molecular dynamics simulations improve homology models of potassium channels.

Authors:  Andriy Anishkin; Adina L Milac; H Robert Guy
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.