Literature DB >> 11456657

2.1 and 1.8 A average C(alpha) RMSD structure predictions on two small proteins, HP-36 and s15.

M R Lee1, D Baker, P A Kollman.   

Abstract

On two different small proteins, the 36-mer villin headpiece domain (HP-36) and the 65-mer structured region of ribosomal protein (S15), several model predictions from the ab initio approach Rosetta were subjected to molecular dynamics simulations for refinement. After clustering the resulting trajectories into conformational families, the average molecular mechanics--Poisson Boltzmann/surface area (MM-PBSA) free energies and alpha carbon (C(alpha)) RMSDs were then calculated for each family. Those conformational families with the lowest average free energies also contained the best C(alpha) RMSD structures (1.4 A for S15 and HP-36 core) and the lowest average C(alpha) RMSDs (1.8 A for S15, 2.1 A for HP-36 core). For comparison, control simulations starting with the two experimental structures were very stable, each consisting of a single conformational family, with an average C(alpha) RMSD of 1.3 A for S15 and 1.2 A for HP-36 core (1.9 A over all residues). In addition, the average free energies' ranks (Spearman rank, r(s)) correlate well with the average C(alpha) RMSDs (r(s) = 0.77 for HP-36, r(s) = 0.83 for S15). Molecular dynamics simulations combined with the MM--PBSA free energy function provide a potentially powerful tool for the protein structure prediction community in allowing for both high-resolution structural refinement and accurate ranking of model predictions. With all of the information that genomics is now providing, this methodology may allow for advances in going from sequence to structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11456657     DOI: 10.1021/ja003150i

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Chem Soc        ISSN: 0002-7863            Impact factor:   15.419


  22 in total

1.  Free energies of protein decoys provide insight into determinants of protein stability.

Authors:  Y N Vorobjev; J Hermans
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  The role of aromatic residues in the hydrophobic core of the villin headpiece subdomain.

Authors:  Benjamin S Frank; Didem Vardar; Deirdre A Buckley; C James McKnight
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Protocol for MM/PBSA molecular dynamics simulations of proteins.

Authors:  Federico Fogolari; Alessandro Brigo; Henriette Molinari
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Mimicking the action of folding chaperones in molecular dynamics simulations: Application to the refinement of homology-based protein structures.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-03-09       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  Smoothing protein energy landscapes by integrating folding models with structure prediction.

Authors:  Ari Pritchard-Bell; M Scott Shell
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2011-11-01       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 7.  The significance of G protein-coupled receptor crystallography for drug discovery.

Authors:  John A Salon; David T Lodowski; Krzysztof Palczewski
Journal:  Pharmacol Rev       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 25.468

8.  New compstatin variants through two de novo protein design frameworks.

Authors:  M L Bellows; H K Fung; M S Taylor; C A Floudas; A López de Victoria; D Morikis
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  Discovery of entry inhibitors for HIV-1 via a new de novo protein design framework.

Authors:  M L Bellows; M S Taylor; P A Cole; L Shen; R F Siliciano; H K Fung; C A Floudas
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 10.  Advances in homology protein structure modeling.

Authors:  Zhexin Xiang
Journal:  Curr Protein Pept Sci       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 3.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.