Literature DB >> 10526364

Analysis and assessment of ab initio three-dimensional prediction, secondary structure, and contacts prediction.

C A Orengo1, J E Bray, T Hubbard, L LoConte, I Sillitoe.   

Abstract

CASP3 saw a substantial increase in the volume of ab initio 3D prediction data, with 507 datasets for fifteen selected targets and sixty-one groups participating. As with CASP2, methods ranged from computationally intensive strategies that attempt to recreate the physical and chemical forces involved in protein folding to the more recent knowledge-based approaches. These exploit information from the structure databases, extracting potentially similar fragments and/or distance constraints derived from multiple sequence alignments. The knowledge-based approaches generally gave more consistently successful predictions across the range of targets, particularly that of the Baker group (Bystroff and Baker, J Mol Biol 1998;281:565-577; Simons et al. Proteins Suppl 1999;3:171-176), which used a fragment library. In the secondary structure prediction category, the most successful approaches built on the concepts used in PHD (Rost et al. Comput Appl Biosci 1994;10:53-60), an accepted standard in this field. Like PHD, they exploit neural networks but have different strategies for incorporating multiple sequence data or position-dependent weight matrices for training the networks. Analysis of the contact data, for which only six groups participated, suggested that as yet this data provides a rather weak signal. However, in combination with other types of prediction data it can sometimes be a useful constraint for identifying the correct structure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10526364     DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1097-0134(1999)37:3+<149::aid-prot20>3.3.co;2-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  32 in total

1.  Prediction of the transmembrane regions of beta-barrel membrane proteins with a neural network-based predictor.

Authors:  I Jacoboni; P L Martelli; P Fariselli; V De Pinto; R Casadio
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Associative memory hamiltonians for structure prediction without homology: alpha-helical proteins.

Authors:  C Hardin; M P Eastwood; Z Luthey-Schulten; P G Wolynes
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Recent improvements in prediction of protein structure by global optimization of a potential energy function.

Authors:  J Pillardy; C Czaplewski; A Liwo; J Lee; D R Ripoll; R Kaźmierkiewicz; S Oldziej; W J Wedemeyer; K D Gibson; Y A Arnautova; J Saunders; Y J Ye; H A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-02-20       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  A physical approach to protein structure prediction.

Authors:  Silvia Crivelli; Elizabeth Eskow; Brett Bader; Vincent Lamberti; Richard Byrd; Robert Schnabel; Teresa Head-Gordon
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 4.033

5.  Ab initio protein structure prediction on a genomic scale: application to the Mycoplasma genitalium genome.

Authors:  Daisuke Kihara; Yang Zhang; Hui Lu; Andrzej Kolinski; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-04-16       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Models of the extracellular domain of the nicotinic receptors and of agonist- and Ca2+-binding sites.

Authors:  Nicolas Le Novère; Thomas Grutter; Jean-Pierre Changeux
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-26       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  A method for optimizing potential-energy functions by a hierarchical design of the potential-energy landscape: application to the UNRES force field.

Authors:  Adam Liwo; Piotr Arłukowicz; Cezary Czaplewski; Stanislaw Ołdziej; Jaroslaw Pillardy; Harold A Scheraga
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2002-02-19       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  Refinement of homology-based protein structures by molecular dynamics simulation techniques.

Authors:  Hao Fan; Alan E Mark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 6.725

10.  Extension of a local backbone description using a structural alphabet: a new approach to the sequence-structure relationship.

Authors:  Alexandre G de Brevern; Hélène Valadié; Serge Hazout; Catherine Etchebest
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 6.725

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.