Literature DB >> 9367768

Do aligned sequences share the same fold?

R A Abagyan1, S Batalov.   

Abstract

Sequence comparison remains a powerful tool to assess the structural relatedness of two proteins. To develop a sensitive sequence-based procedure for fold recognition, we performed an exhaustive global alignment (with zero end gap penalties) between sequences of protein domains with known three-dimensional folds. The subset of 1.3 million alignments between sequences of structurally unrelated domains was used to derive a set of analytical functions that represent the probability of structural significance for any sequence alignment at a given sequence identity, sequence similarity and alignment score. Analysis of overlap between structurally significant and insignificant alignments shows that sequence identity and sequence similarity measures are poor indicators of structural relatedness in the "twilight zone", while the alignment score allows much better discrimination between alignments of structurally related and unrelated sequences for a wide variety of alignment settings. A fold recognition benchmark was used to compare eight different substitution matrices with eight sets of gap penalties. The best performing matrices were Gonnet and Blosum50 with normalized gap penalties of 2.4/0.15 and 2.0/0.15, respectively, while the positive matrices were the worst performers. The derived functions and parameters can be used for fold recognition via a multilink chain of probability weighted pairwise sequence alignments.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9367768     DOI: 10.1006/jmbi.1997.1287

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Mol Biol        ISSN: 0022-2836            Impact factor:   5.469


  74 in total

1.  LiveBench-1: continuous benchmarking of protein structure prediction servers.

Authors:  J M Bujnicki; A Elofsson; D Fischer; L Rychlewski
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 6.725

2.  Comparative analysis of chloroplast genomes: functional annotation, genome-based phylogeny, and deduced evolutionary patterns.

Authors:  Javier De Las Rivas; Juan Jose Lozano; Angel R Ortiz
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 9.043

3.  Improved detection of homologous membrane proteins by inclusion of information from topology predictions.

Authors:  Maria Hedman; Hans Deloof; Gunnar Von Heijne; Arne Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.725

4.  Crystal structure of the Bse634I restriction endonuclease: comparison of two enzymes recognizing the same DNA sequence.

Authors:  Saulius Grazulis; Markus Deibert; Renata Rimseliene; Remigijus Skirgaila; Giedrius Sasnauskas; Arunas Lagunavicius; Vladimir Repin; Claus Urbanke; Robert Huber; Virginijus Siksnys
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2002-02-15       Impact factor: 16.971

5.  Pcons: a neural-network-based consensus predictor that improves fold recognition.

Authors:  J Lundström; L Rychlewski; J Bujnicki; A Elofsson
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 6.725

6.  BUR1 and BUR2 encode a divergent cyclin-dependent kinase-cyclin complex important for transcription in vivo.

Authors:  S Yao; A Neiman; G Prelich
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.272

7.  Statistical significance of protein structure prediction by threading.

Authors:  L A Mirny; A V Finkelstein; E I Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-08-29       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  MAMMOTH (matching molecular models obtained from theory): an automated method for model comparison.

Authors:  Angel R Ortiz; Charlie E M Strauss; Osvaldo Olmea
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.725

9.  A method for prediction of the locations of linker regions within large multifunctional proteins, and application to a type I polyketide synthase.

Authors:  Daniel W Udwary; Matthew Merski; Craig A Townsend
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  2002-10-25       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Analysis of protein sequence/structure similarity relationships.

Authors:  Hin Hark Gan; Rebecca A Perlow; Sharmili Roy; Joy Ko; Min Wu; Jing Huang; Shixiang Yan; Angelo Nicoletta; Jonathan Vafai; Ding Sun; Lihua Wang; Joyce E Noah; Samuela Pasquali; Tamar Schlick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 4.033

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.