Literature DB >> 2720569

Participation of high-risk subjects in colon cancer screening.

R S Sandler1, B M DeVellis, S J Blalock, K L Holland.   

Abstract

Siblings of colorectal cancer patients are estimated to be three times more likely to develop colorectal cancer. Although these high-risk siblings are appropriate candidates for colon cancer screening, the factors that affect their participation in screening programs are not known. A study was conducted to examine the factors that might influence participation in fecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening by high-risk siblings of recently diagnosed colon cancer patients and nonhigh-risk control siblings. Siblings were mailed a sample FOBT card, a letter informing them of their risk status, and an invitation to participate in the FOBT screening program. They were later interviewed by telephone about their intention to participate in FOBT screening. FOBT cards were returned by 52.2% of high-risk siblings compared with 37.7% of control siblings (P less than 0.005). Only 24.8% of the cancer siblings thought they were more likely to get colon cancer compared with others their own age, and 27.8% thought they were less likely. Perceived risk of cancer and demographic and health-related factors did not predict compliance beyond membership in the high-risk group. Siblings of colon cancer patients are more likely to participate in screening, and efforts to screen them could have a substantial impact on colorectal cancer. More work is needed to identify the factors responsible for compliance so that effective interventions can be developed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2720569     DOI: 10.1002/1097-0142(19890601)63:11<2211::aid-cncr2820631125>3.0.co;2-q

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cancer        ISSN: 0008-543X            Impact factor:   6.860


  11 in total

Review 1.  Individual-level factors in colorectal cancer screening: a review of the literature on the relation of individual-level health behavior constructs and screening behavior.

Authors:  Marc T Kiviniemi; Alyssa Bennett; Marie Zaiter; James R Marshall
Journal:  Psychooncology       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 3.894

2.  Results of a pilot study of endoscopic screening of first degree relatives of colorectal cancer patients in Italy.

Authors:  L Colombo; G Corti; F Magrì; A Marocchi; P Brambilla; C Crespi; L Manieri; S Ghezzi; D Giannone; L Merlino; P Mocarelli
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  No association between colorectal cancer worry and screening uptake in Appalachian Ohio.

Authors:  Adana A Llanos; Michael L Pennell; Gregory S Young; Cathy M Tatum; Mira L Katz; Electra D Paskett
Journal:  J Public Health (Oxf)       Date:  2014-05-20       Impact factor: 2.341

4.  Gail model breast cancer risk components are poor predictors of risk perception and screening behavior.

Authors:  M B Daly; C L Lerman; E Ross; M D Schwartz; C B Sands; A Masny
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.872

5.  Colorectal screening patterns and perceptions of risk among African-American users of a community health center.

Authors:  I M Lipkus; B K Rimer; P R Lyna; A A Pradhan; M Conaway; C T Woods-Powell
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  1996-12

6.  Family based colorectal cancer screening in a district hospital.

Authors:  N P Cripps; R J Heald
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Adherence to colorectal cancer screening in mammography-adherent older women.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2003-12

8.  Feasibility of family based screening for colorectal neoplasia: experience in one general surgical practice.

Authors:  B M Stephenson; V A Murday; P J Finan; P Quirke; M F Dixon; D T Bishop
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  Screening flexible sigmoidoscopy: patient attitudes and compliance.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M A Moskowitz
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.128

10.  A randomized trial of two print interventions to increase colon cancer screening among first-degree relatives.

Authors:  Susan M Rawl; Victoria L Champion; Linda L Scott; Honghong Zhou; Patrick Monahan; Yan Ding; Patrick Loehrer; Celette Sugg Skinner
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2008-03-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.