Shannon M Christy1, Susan M Rawl. 1. Purdue School of Science, Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis, Indianapolis, USA. shanchri@iupui.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework to guide research on shared decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among persons at average risk and their providers. METHODS: Based upon a comprehensive review of empirical literature and relevant theories, a conceptual framework was developed that incorporated patient characteristics, cultural beliefs, provider/health care system variables, health belief/knowledge/stage of adoption variables, and shared decision-making between patients and providers that may predict behavior. Relationships among concepts in the framework, shared decision-making process and outcomes, and CRC screening behavior were proposed. Directions for future research were presented. RESULTS: Many of the concepts in the proposed framework have been examined in prior research. However, these elements have not been combined previously to explain shared decision-making about CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to test the proposed relationships and hypotheses and to refine the framework. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from future research guided by the proposed framework may inform clinical practice to facilitate shared decision-making about CRC screening.
OBJECTIVE: To develop a conceptual framework to guide research on shared decision-making about colorectal cancer (CRC) screening among persons at average risk and their providers. METHODS: Based upon a comprehensive review of empirical literature and relevant theories, a conceptual framework was developed that incorporated patient characteristics, cultural beliefs, provider/health care system variables, health belief/knowledge/stage of adoption variables, and shared decision-making between patients and providers that may predict behavior. Relationships among concepts in the framework, shared decision-making process and outcomes, and CRC screening behavior were proposed. Directions for future research were presented. RESULTS: Many of the concepts in the proposed framework have been examined in prior research. However, these elements have not been combined previously to explain shared decision-making about CRC screening. CONCLUSION: Research is needed to test the proposed relationships and hypotheses and to refine the framework. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Findings from future research guided by the proposed framework may inform clinical practice to facilitate shared decision-making about CRC screening.
Authors: Susan N Lukwago; Matthew W Kreuter; Cheryl L Holt; Karen Steger-May; Dawn C Bucholtz; Celette Sugg Skinner Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2003-08 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Jennifer L Hay; Jennifer S Ford; David Klein; Louis H Primavera; Tamara R Buckley; Traci R Stein; Moshe Shike; Jamie S Ostroff Journal: J Behav Med Date: 2003-12
Authors: Leslie R Carnahan; Lindsey Jones; Katherine C Brewer; Elizabeth A Watts; Caryn E Peterson; Carol Estwing Ferrans; Toni Cipriano-Steffens; Blase Polite; Ajay V Maker; Rozina Chowdhery; Yamilé Molina; Garth H Rauscher Journal: J Cancer Educ Date: 2021-06 Impact factor: 2.037
Authors: Travis Hyams; Bruce Golden; John Sammarco; Shahnaz Sultan; Evelyn King-Marshall; Min Qi Wang; Barbara Curbow Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2021-07-29 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Jayoung Han; Paiboon Jungsuwadee; Olufunmilola Abraham; Dongwoo Ko Journal: Int J Environ Res Public Health Date: 2018-07-17 Impact factor: 3.390