Literature DB >> 8340943

Screening for colorectal cancer with fecal occult blood testing and sigmoidoscopy.

S J Winawer1, B J Flehinger, D Schottenfeld, D G Miller.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The high incidence of and mortality from colorectal cancer (160,000 new cases and 60,000 deaths in the United States each year) are compelling public health concerns. Following the evolution of effective surgery for this disease since the 1960s, the focus has been on improving methods of detection and integrating them into effective screening programs.
PURPOSE: This was the first study to evaluate the effectiveness, in a setting of comprehensive medical examinations, of using the fecal occult blood test in conjunction with sigmoidoscopy, rather than sigmoidoscopy alone, to screen for colorectal cancer. Our end points were extent of compliance with fecal occult blood test and sigmoidoscopy, numbers of cancers detected, and mortality rate.
METHODS: From 1975 through 1979, a total of 21,756 patients (aged 40 and older) who presented at the Preventive Medicine Institute-Strang Clinic for routine medical examinations were enrolled by calendar period into study and control groups. Study patients were offered annually both rigid sigmoidoscopy examinations and fecal occult blood tests requiring two stool specimens per day for 3 days, while control patients were offered only annual sigmoidoscopy. The majority of fecal occult blood test cards were not rehydrated before assay. Patients with positive tests were referred for double-contrast barium enema and colonoscopy. Two distinct trials were carried out. Trial I was primarily a demonstration of feasibility of using the fecal occult blood test as a supplemental screening method. Of the 9277 participants, 7168 (77%) were assigned to the study group and offered the fecal occult blood test. In trial II, approximately half of the 12,479 patients were assigned to each group. Patients in both trials had follow-up through 1984.
RESULTS: Compliance with the fecal occult blood test was initially high in both trials, but diminished such that only 56% of study patients in trial I and 20% of those in trial II returned for second tests. On the initial (prevalence) screen, a substantial number of early-stage cancers were detected by the fecal occult blood test, primarily in trial II. In trial II, survival probability was significantly greater (P < .001) in the study group than in the controls (70% versus 48%), and colorectal cancer mortality was lower (0.36 versus 0.63) with borderline significance (P = .053, one-sided). CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS: The screening of average-risk individuals (aged 50 and older) for colorectal cancer through use of the fecal occult blood test in conjunction with sigmoidoscopy can increase the likelihood of early detection of this disease. This practice, coupled with prompt diagnostic work-up following positive tests, will result in treatment of earlier stage cancers and increased survival after treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8340943     DOI: 10.1093/jnci/85.16.1311

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst        ISSN: 0027-8874            Impact factor:   13.506


  45 in total

1.  Computed tomography colonography (virtual colonoscopy): a new method for colorectal screening.

Authors:  C D Johnson; D A Ahlquist
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Colorectal cancer screening: now is the time.

Authors:  S J Winawer; A G Zauber
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-09-05       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Efficacy in standard clinical practice of colonoscopic polypectomy in reducing colorectal cancer incidence.

Authors:  F Citarda; G Tomaselli; R Capocaccia; S Barcherini; M Crespi
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 23.059

4.  Experience of a public health colorectal cancer testing program in Maryland.

Authors:  Diane M Dwyer; Carmela Groves; Annette Hopkins; Eithne Keelaghan; Fatma M Shebl; Barbara Andrews; Marsha Bienia; Eileen Steinberger
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2012 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Performance of the fecal immunochemical test is not decreased by high ambient temperature in the rapid return system.

Authors:  Jae Myung Cha; Joung Il Lee; Kwang Ro Joo; Hyun Phil Shin; Jae Jun Park; Jung Won Jeun; Jun Uk Lim; Sang-Hyun Hwang
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 3.199

6.  Automated telephone calls improved completion of fecal occult blood testing.

Authors:  David M Mosen; Adrianne C Feldstein; Nancy Perrin; A Gabriela Rosales; David H Smith; Elizabeth G Liles; Jennifer L Schneider; Jennifer E Lafata; Ronald E Myers; Michael Kositch; Thomas Hickey; Russell E Glasgow
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 2.983

Review 7.  Screening for cancer: valuable or not?

Authors:  Frank L Meyskens
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.075

8.  A systematic review of the effects of screening for colorectal cancer using the faecal occult blood test, hemoccult.

Authors:  B Towler; L Irwig; P Glasziou; J Kewenter; D Weller; C Silagy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1998-08-29

9.  Public health and cooperative group partnership: a colorectal cancer intervention.

Authors:  Sherri G Homan; Bob R Steward; Jane M Armer
Journal:  Semin Oncol Nurs       Date:  2013-12-19       Impact factor: 2.315

10.  Prevention of colorectal cancer: guidelines based on new data. WHO Collaborating Center for the Prevention of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  S J Winawer; D J St John; J H Bond; P Rozen; R W Burt; J D Waye; O Kronborg; M J O'Brien; D T Bishop; R C Kurtz
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 9.408

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.