Literature DB >> 14671986

Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain.

S Brouwer1, M F Reneman, P U Dijkstra, J W Groothoff, J M Schellekens, L N Göeken.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work System Functional Capacity Evaluation (IWS FCE) in a sample of patients (n = 30) suffering from Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) and selected for rehabilitation treatment. The IWS FCE consists of 28 tests that reflect work-related activities like lifting, carrying, bending, etc. In this study, a slightly modified IWS FCE was used. Patients were included in the study if they were still at work or were less than 1 year out of work because of CLBP. Participants' mean age was 40 years, the duration of low back pain ranged between 5 and 10 years. Fifteen patients (50%) were out of work for a mean of 17 weeks, and they all received financial compensation. Two FCE sessions were held with a 2-week interval in between. Means per session, 95% confidence intervals of the mean difference, one-way random Intra Class Correlations (ICC), limits of agreement, Cohen's kappa and percentage of absolute agreement were calculated where appropriate. An ICC of 0.75 or more, a kappa value of more than 0.60 and a percentage of absolute agreement of 80% were considered as an acceptable reliability. Tests of the IWC FCE were divided into tests with and tests without an acceptable test-retest reliability on the basis of the kappa values, the percentage of absolute agreement and the ICC values. Fifteen tests (79%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on Kappa values and percentage of absolute agreement. Eleven tests (61%) showed an acceptable test-retest reliability based on ICC values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14671986     DOI: 10.1023/a:1026264519996

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  12 in total

1.  Measuring maximum holding times and perception of static elevated work and forward bending in healthy young adults.

Authors:  M F Reneman; M M Bults; L H Engbers; K K Mulders; L N Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-06

2.  Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04

3.  Statistical evaluation of agreement between two methods for measuring a quantitative variable.

Authors:  J Lee; D Koh; C N Ong
Journal:  Comput Biol Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.589

4.  Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement.

Authors:  J M Bland; D G Altman
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1986-02-08       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  Methodological issues in assessing reproducibility--a comparative study of various indices of reproducibility applied to repeat ELISA serologic tests for Lyme disease.

Authors:  M C Tammemagi; J W Frank; M Leblanc; H Artsob; D L Streiner
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 6.  Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity.

Authors:  E Abdel-Moty; D A Fishbain; T M Khalil; S Sadek; R Cutler; R S Rosomoff; H L Rosomoff
Journal:  Clin J Pain       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 3.442

7.  Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; M Westmaas; L N H Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-12

8.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  P M King; N Tuckwell; T E Barrett
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

9.  The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  M F Reneman; S M H J Jaegers; M Westmaas; L N H Göeken
Journal:  Work       Date:  2002

10.  Determining the generalizability of rating scales in clinical settings.

Authors:  W J Evans; C G Cayten; P A Green
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 2.983

View more
  42 in total

1.  Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  S IJmker; E H Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

3.  What is the rate of functional improvement during occupational rehabilitation in workers' compensation claimants?

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Calvin Haws; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

4.  Basis for an FCE methodology for patients with work-related upper limb disorders.

Authors:  M F Reneman; R Soer; E H J Gerrits
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

Review 5.  Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.

Authors:  Vincent Gouttebarge; Haije Wind; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  The role of back muscle endurance, maximum force, balance and trunk rotation control regarding lifting capacity.

Authors:  Peter Schenk; Andreas Klipstein; Susanne Spillmann; Jesper Strøyer; Thomas Laubli
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-11-20       Impact factor: 3.078

7.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

8.  Matching FCE activities and work demands: an explorative study.

Authors:  W Kuijer; S Brouwer; M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; J W Groothoff; J M H Schellekens; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

9.  The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 3.015

10.  Do analgesics improve functioning in patients with chronic low back pain? An explorative triple-blinded RCT.

Authors:  Henrica R Schiphorst Preuper; Jan H B Geertzen; Marten van Wijhe; Anne M Boonstra; Barbara H W Molmans; Pieter U Dijkstra; Michiel F Reneman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2014-02-15       Impact factor: 3.134

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.