Literature DB >> 8219516

Functional capacity and residual functional capacity and their utility in measuring work capacity.

E Abdel-Moty1, D A Fishbain, T M Khalil, S Sadek, R Cutler, R S Rosomoff, H L Rosomoff.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The pain physician is often asked to establish the medical impairment of the chronic pain patient (CPP) and from that determination ascertain the work capacity of the CPP. Functional capacity (FC) testing has recently been introduced as a more objective and accurate way of facilitating the determination of work capacity. However, there are conceptual problems with the measurement of FC. These will be reviewed and the relationship of FC to residual functional capacity (RFC) will be determined. Finally, a method for measuring RFC in a job-specific manner will be suggested. DATA SOURCES: The literature in reference to the measurement of medical impairment, FC, and RFC was reviewed. STUDY SELECTION: Studies appropriate to the objective of this review were selected for inclusion.
CONCLUSIONS: The FC and RFC are poorly defined. Lack of definition has interfered with design of appropriate test batteries specific to work capacity. To circumvent this problem a job-specific RFC measurement method is suggested. This method is based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1993        PMID: 8219516     DOI: 10.1097/00002508-199309000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin J Pain        ISSN: 0749-8047            Impact factor:   3.442


  13 in total

1.  Development and construct validation of the Hand Function Sort.

Authors:  L N Matheson; V K Kaskutas; D Mada
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2001-06

Review 2.  Psychosocial factors and functional capacity evaluation among persons with chronic pain.

Authors:  Michael E Geisser; Michael E Robinson; Quaintance L Miller; Suzanne M Bade
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 3.  Practical aspects of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  Glenn S Pransky; Patrick G Dempsey
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

4.  Matching FCE activities and work demands: an explorative study.

Authors:  W Kuijer; S Brouwer; M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; J W Groothoff; J M H Schellekens; J H B Geertzen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-09

5.  The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims.

Authors:  Haije Wind; Vincent Gouttebarge; P Paul F M Kuijer; Judith K Sluiter; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-14       Impact factor: 3.015

6.  Measurement qualities of a self-report and therapist-scored functional capacity instrument based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  Craig A Velozo; Bongsam Choi; Sheryl Eckberg Zylstra; Rochelle Santopoalo
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03

7.  Functional capacity evaluation in subjects with early osteoarthritis of hip and/or knee; is two-day testing needed?

Authors:  M W van Ittersum; H J Bieleman; M F Reneman; F G J Oosterveld; J W Groothoff; C P van der Schans
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2009-05-15

8.  Functional and work capacity evaluation issues.

Authors:  Warren T Jahn; Leanne N Cupon; John H Steinbaugh
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2004

9.  Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wim Jorritsma; Jan M H Schellekens; Ludwig N H Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

10.  Measuring clients' perception of functional limitations using the Perceived Functioning & Health questionnaire.

Authors:  J M H Schellekens; F I Abma; H P G Mulders; S Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2010-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.