Literature DB >> 12389478

Test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying in a 2-day functional capacity evaluation.

M F Reneman1, P U Dijkstra, M Westmaas, L N H Göeken.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to establish test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying of a functional capacity evaluation (FCE) on two consecutive days and to verify the need for a 2-day protocol. A cohort of 50 patients (39 men, 11 women) with nonspecific low back pain were evaluated using a 2-day FCE protocol. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated for weight lifted and carried. Predictive relationships between test and retest were explored by means of a regression analysis. The results of ICC were lifting low 0.87, lifting overhead 0.87, and carrying 0.77. Performances on day 2 were on an average 6-9% higher. Other than the amount of weight handled on day 1, no variable was found to predict performance on day 2. It was concluded that test-retest reliability of lifting and carrying was good, and the need for a 2-day protocol could not be confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 12389478     DOI: 10.1023/a:1020274624791

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  9 in total

1.  Reliability of safe maximum lifting determinations of a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  2002-04

2.  Reliability of independent observer judgments of level of lift effort in a kinesiophysical Functional Capacity Evaluation.

Authors:  S.J. Isernhagen; D.L. Hart; L.M. Matheson
Journal:  Work       Date:  1999

Review 3.  The functional capacity evaluation: measuring maximal work abilities.

Authors:  A K Tramposh
Journal:  Occup Med       Date:  1992 Jan-Mar

4.  Revised NIOSH equation for the design and evaluation of manual lifting tasks.

Authors:  T R Waters; V Putz-Anderson; A Garg; L J Fine
Journal:  Ergonomics       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.778

5.  Nonorganic physical signs in low-back pain.

Authors:  G Waddell; J A McCulloch; E Kummel; R M Venner
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1980 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A critical review of functional capacity evaluations.

Authors:  P M King; N Tuckwell; T E Barrett
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1998-08

7.  Therapists' ability to identify safe maximum lifting in low back pain patients during functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  R L Smith
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.751

8.  The reliability of determining effort level of lifting and carrying in a functional capacity evaluation.

Authors:  M F Reneman; S M H J Jaegers; M Westmaas; L N H Göeken
Journal:  Work       Date:  2002

9.  Reliability and validity of a newly developed test of physical work performance.

Authors:  D E Lechner; J R Jackson; D L Roth; K V Straaton
Journal:  J Occup Med       Date:  1994-09
  9 in total
  34 in total

1.  Upper lifting performance of healthy young adults in functional capacity evaluations: a comparison of two protocols.

Authors:  S IJmker; E H Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 2.  Measurement properties of performance-based assessment of functional capacity.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-09

3.  Measuring physical performance via self-report in healthy young adults.

Authors:  W Kuijer; E H J Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-03

4.  The concurrent validity of the ERGOS Work Simulator and the Ergo-Kit with respect to maximum lifting capacity.

Authors:  G Rustenburg; P P F M Kuijer; M H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-06

5.  What is the rate of functional improvement during occupational rehabilitation in workers' compensation claimants?

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Calvin Haws; Riikka Niemeläinen
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2012-09

6.  Basis for an FCE methodology for patients with work-related upper limb disorders.

Authors:  M F Reneman; R Soer; E H J Gerrits
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

Review 7.  Reliability and validity of Functional Capacity Evaluation methods: a systematic review with reference to Blankenship system, Ergos work simulator, Ergo-Kit and Isernhagen work system.

Authors:  Vincent Gouttebarge; Haije Wind; P Paul F M Kuijer; Monique H W Frings-Dresen
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2004-11-09       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Functional capacity evaluation performance does not predict sustained return to work in claimants with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Douglas Paul Gross; Michele Crites Battié
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-09

9.  Symptom increase following a functional capacity evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain: an explorative study of safety.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wietske Kuijer; Sandra Brouwer; H R Schiphorst Preuper; Johan W Groothoff; Jan H B Geertzen; Pieter U Dijkstra
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-06

10.  Development and validation of a short-form functional capacity evaluation for use in claimants with low back disorders.

Authors:  Douglas P Gross; Michele C Battié; Alexander Asante
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2006-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.