Literature DB >> 11706534

Measuring maximum holding times and perception of static elevated work and forward bending in healthy young adults.

M F Reneman1, M M Bults, L H Engbers, K K Mulders, L N Göeken.   

Abstract

The objectives of this study were to investigate the maximum holding times (MHT) of two highly stressful postures: standing in a forward bend position and performing elevated work in a standing position. The relationship between perceived exertion and MHT was also studied. Subjects were 44 young adults, age 20-29 years (25 female, 19 male). A test-retest design was used to establish reliability. Mean maximum holding times for forward bending and elevated work were respectively 14.51 and 16.18 min with large interindividual variations. A logarithmic rather than a linear relation between perceived exertion and performance is found. It is not possible to reliably predict MHTs from subjective data. Test-retest correlation is high (n = 19, r = 0.716 and 0.813, p < 0.001), and the scores did not differ significantly (p < 0.005), indicating a reliable procedure. The average holding times of the population studied are higher than expected from literature. Neither generic formulas, curve estimations, or predictions can reliably predict an individual's MHT. An individual's MHTs are best tested through performance based testing.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11706534     DOI: 10.1023/a:1016603318235

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Occup Rehabil        ISSN: 1053-0487


  6 in total

1.  Development of a measure of perceived functional ability.

Authors:  L N Matheson; M L Matheson; J Grant
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1993-03

2.  Pain expectancies, pain, and functional self-efficacy expectancies as determinants of disability in patients with chronic low back disorders.

Authors:  J M Lacker; A M Carosella; M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Consult Clin Psychol       Date:  1996-02

3.  Psychophysical scaling with applications in physical work and the perception of exertion.

Authors:  G Borg
Journal:  Scand J Work Environ Health       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 5.024

4.  Measuring residual functional capacity in chronic low back pain patients based on the Dictionary of Occupational Titles.

Authors:  D A Fishbain; E Abdel-Moty; R Cutler; T M Khalil; S Sadek; R S Rosomoff; H L Rosomoff
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1994-04-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  The relative influence of perceived pain control, anxiety, and functional self efficacy on spinal function among patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  J M Lackner; A M Carosella
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 3.468

6.  A multidisciplinary approach to the prevention, evaluation, and management of work disability.

Authors:  M Feuerstein
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  1991-03
  6 in total
  8 in total

1.  Measuring physical performance via self-report in healthy young adults.

Authors:  W Kuijer; E H J Gerrits; M F Reneman
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2004-03

2.  [Lifting capacity with low back pain : Discrepancy between self-rated and real lifting capacity in patients with back pain and pain-free controls].

Authors:  M Pfingsten; A Wendt; B Kröner-Herwig; S Lüder; J Hildebrandt; F Petzke
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 1.107

3.  Safety issues in functional capacity evaluation: findings from a trial of a new approach for evaluating clients with chronic back pain.

Authors:  Libby Gibson; Jenny Strong
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2005-06

4.  Relationships between maximum holding time and ratings of pain and exertion differ for static and dynamic tasks.

Authors:  Laura A Frey Law; Jennifer E Lee; Tara R McMullen; Ting Xia
Journal:  Appl Ergon       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.661

5.  Concurrent validity of questionnaire and performance-based disability measurements in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain.

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Wim Jorritsma; Jan M H Schellekens; Ludwig N H Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2002-09

6.  Test-retest reliability of the Isernhagen Work Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation in patients with chronic low back pain.

Authors:  S Brouwer; M F Reneman; P U Dijkstra; J W Groothoff; J M Schellekens; L N Göeken
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2003-12

Review 7.  The reliability of WorkWell Systems Functional Capacity Evaluation: a systematic review.

Authors:  Sebastian Bieniek; Matthias Bethge
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2014-03-27       Impact factor: 2.362

8.  General and specific self-efficacy reports of patients with chronic low back pain: are they related to performances in a functional capacity evaluation?

Authors:  Michiel F Reneman; Jan H B Geertzen; Johan W Groothoff; Sandra Brouwer
Journal:  J Occup Rehabil       Date:  2008-04-08
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.