Literature DB >> 14662468

Delayed saccades, but not delayed manual aiming movements, require visual attention shifts.

Heiner Deubel1, Werner X Schneider.   

Abstract

Several studies have shown that during the preparation of a goal-directed movement, perceptual selection (i.e., visual attention) and action selection (the selection of the movement target) are closely coupled. Here, we study attentional selection in situations in which delayed saccadic eye movements and delayed manual movements are prepared. A dual-task paradigm was used which combined the movement preparation with a perceptual discrimination task. The results demonstrate a fundamental difference between the preparation of saccades and of manual reaching. For delayed saccades, attention is pinned to the saccade target until the onset of the response. This does not hold for manual reaching, however. Although fast reaching movements require attention, reaches delayed more than 300 ms after movement cue onset can be already performed "off-line"; that is, attention can be withdrawn from the movement target.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14662468     DOI: 10.1196/annals.1303.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci        ISSN: 0077-8923            Impact factor:   5.691


  33 in total

1.  Internally generated and externally triggered actions are physically distinct and independently controlled.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2004-05-15       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Dissociated effects of distractors on saccades and manual aiming.

Authors:  Robert D McIntosh; Antimo Buonocore
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-06-09       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Neural correlates of attention and distractibility in the lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-12-07       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Reaction times of manual responses to a visual stimulus at the goal of a planned memory-guided saccade in the monkey.

Authors:  B Suresh Krishna; Sara C Steenrod; James W Bisley; Yevgeniy B Sirotin; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Bonnie M Lawrence; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

6.  Trans-saccadic repetition priming: ERPs reveal on-line integration of information across words.

Authors:  Jonathan Grainger; Katherine J Midgley; Phillip J Holcomb
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-12-02       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  The time course of presaccadic attention shifts.

Authors:  Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2008-10-07

8.  Modification of planned actions.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Shannon Matkovich; Sam J Gilbert
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-10-08       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Task specific computations in attentional maps.

Authors:  Jacqueline Gottlieb; Puiu F Balan; Jeff Oristaglio; David Schneider
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2008-05-27       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  Presaccadic attention interferes with feature detection.

Authors:  Thérèse Collins; Tobias Heed; Karine Doré-Mazars; Brigitte Röder
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-09-17       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.