Literature DB >> 18841355

Modification of planned actions.

Sukhvinder S Obhi1, Shannon Matkovich, Sam J Gilbert.   

Abstract

To elucidate the time course and processes underlying pre-movement modification of planned actions, participants prepared to make an action at a time of their own choosing within a specified temporal window. In some conditions, participants prepared to make a single right index finger key press, whereas in others, they prepared to make a sequence of two key presses consisting of a right index finger key press followed by a right middle finger key press. On a proportion of trials, their internal preparation was interrupted by an auditory tone, in response to which they made either: the same action as they were intending, a different action requiring an additional effector (i.e. switch from preparing a single right index finger key press to executing a right index, middle finger sequence), or a different action requiring one less effector (i.e. switch from preparing a right index, middle finger sequence to executing a right index finger key press). For unmodified actions, switching from an internally generated to an externally triggered mode of response production produced a significant reaction time cost (RT cost) for both single and sequential actions, with the cost for single actions being significantly greater than that for sequential actions. Given that the RT cost did not increase as the complexity of the actions increased it is unlikely that the source of the cost is related to motor execution processes, and it is suggested that it may arise at a higher level cognitive stage of processing. In addition, reaction times to produce modified actions were significantly greater than those to produce unmodified actions. Finally, it took significantly longer to produce modified actions requiring one less effector than to produce modified actions requiring one more effector. We suggest that two time-consuming processes are involved in switching between internally generated and externally triggered actions that are modified or unmodified: a trigger switch cost when the same action has to be produced in response to an external trigger as opposed to an internal trigger, and a switch cost reflecting changes in the pattern of executed motor commands when modification is necessary. It is suggested that such processes may be mediated by regions of the frontal lobes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18841355     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-008-1584-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  27 in total

1.  Observing one's hand become anarchic: an fMRI study of action identification.

Authors:  Dirk T Leube; Günther Knoblich; Michael Erb; Tilo T J Kircher
Journal:  Conscious Cogn       Date:  2003-12

2.  Beneficial effects of ambiguous precues: parallel motor preparation or reduced premotoric processing time?

Authors:  Ines Jentzsch; Hartmut Leuthold; K Richard Ridderinkhof
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.016

3.  Canceling planned action: an FMRI study of countermanding saccades.

Authors:  Clayton E Curtis; Michael W Cole; Vikas Y Rao; Mark D'Esposito
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2004-12-22       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Involvement of rostral prefrontal cortex in selection between stimulus-oriented and stimulus-independent thought.

Authors:  Sam J Gilbert; Christopher D Frith; Paul W Burgess
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.386

5.  Intracortical inhibition during volitional inhibition of prepared action.

Authors:  James P Coxon; Cathy M Stinear; Winston D Byblow
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2006-02-22       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 6.  The domain of supervisory processes and temporal organization of behaviour.

Authors:  T Shallice; P Burgess
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1996-10-29       Impact factor: 6.237

7.  Countermanding eye-head gaze shifts in humans: marching orders are delivered to the head first.

Authors:  Brian D Corneil; James K Elsley
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  Neural processes associated with antisaccade task performance investigated with event-related FMRI.

Authors:  Kristen A Ford; Herbert C Goltz; Matthew R G Brown; Stefan Everling
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2005-02-23       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Self-initiated versus externally triggered movements. I. An investigation using measurement of regional cerebral blood flow with PET and movement-related potentials in normal and Parkinson's disease subjects.

Authors:  M Jahanshahi; I H Jenkins; R G Brown; C D Marsden; R E Passingham; D J Brooks
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Contention scheduling and the control of routine activities.

Authors:  R Cooper; T Shallice
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2000-06-01       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  6 in total

1.  Effects of intentional movement preparation on response times to symbolic and imitative cues.

Authors:  Katherine R Naish; Amentha Rajagobal; Carl Michael Galang; Luisa Sartori; Sukhvinder S Obhi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2016-11-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The quick and the dead: when reaction beats intention.

Authors:  Andrew E Welchman; James Stanley; Malte R Schomers; R Chris Miall; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-03       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  A Hierarchical Attractor Network Model of perceptual versus intentional decision updates.

Authors:  Anne Löffler; Anastasia Sylaidi; Zafeirios Fountas; Patrick Haggard
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2021-04-01       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Dual process for intentional and reactive decisions.

Authors:  Marie Devaine; Florian Waszak; Pascal Mamassian
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 4.475

5.  The StartReact effect on self-initiated movements.

Authors:  J M Castellote; M E L Van den Berg; J Valls-Solé
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 3.411

6.  The controlled imitation task: a new paradigm for studying self-other control.

Authors:  Sukhvinder S Obhi; Jeremy Hogeveen
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2013-09-19       Impact factor: 2.984

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.