Literature DB >> 24018719

Reach preparation enhances visual performance and appearance.

Martin Rolfs1, Bonnie M Lawrence, Marisa Carrasco.   

Abstract

We investigated the impact of the preparation of reach movements on visual perception by simultaneously quantifying both an objective measure of visual sensitivity and the subjective experience of apparent contrast. Using a two-by-two alternative forced choice task, observers compared the orientation (clockwise or counterclockwise) and the contrast (higher or lower) of a Standard Gabor and a Test Gabor, the latter of which was presented during reach preparation, at the reach target location or the opposite location. Discrimination performance was better overall at the reach target than at the opposite location. Perceived contrast increased continuously at the target relative to the opposite location during reach preparation, that is, after the onset of the cue indicating the reach target. The finding that performance and appearance do not evolve in parallel during reach preparation points to a distinction with saccade preparation, for which we have shown previously there is a parallel temporal evolution of performance and appearance. Yet akin to saccade preparation, this study reveals that overall reach preparation enhances both visual performance and appearance.

Keywords:  attention; intention; manual reach; movement preparation; priority

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24018719      PMCID: PMC3758200          DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2013.0057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci        ISSN: 0962-8436            Impact factor:   6.237


  44 in total

1.  Equality judgments cannot distinguish between attention effects on appearance and criterion: a reply to Schneider (2011).

Authors:  Katharina Anton-Erxleben; Jared Abrams; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-11-09       Impact factor: 2.240

2.  Deficits in reach target selection during inactivation of the midbrain superior colliculus.

Authors:  Joo-Hyun Song; Robert D Rafal; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2011-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  Predictive remapping of attention across eye movements.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel; Patrick Cavanagh
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2010-12-26       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Independent allocation of attention to eye and hand targets in coordinated eye-hand movements.

Authors:  Donatas Jonikaitis; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2011-01-26

5.  The eye dominates in guiding attention during simultaneous eye and hand movements.

Authors:  Aarlenne Z Khan; Joo-Hyun Song; Robert M McPeek
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2011-01-07       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Attention, intention, and priority in the parietal lobe.

Authors:  James W Bisley; Michael E Goldberg
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Rapid simultaneous enhancement of visual sensitivity and perceived contrast during saccade preparation.

Authors:  Martin Rolfs; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-10-03       Impact factor: 6.167

8.  The responses of visual neurons in the frontal eye field are biased for saccades.

Authors:  Bonnie M Lawrence; Lawrence H Snyder
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-11-04       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  On the automaticity and flexibility of covert attention: a speed-accuracy trade-off analysis.

Authors:  Anna Marie Giordano; Brian McElree; Marisa Carrasco
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2009-03-31       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 10.  Top-down versus bottom-up attentional control: a failed theoretical dichotomy.

Authors:  Edward Awh; Artem V Belopolsky; Jan Theeuwes
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2012-07-12       Impact factor: 20.229

View more
  12 in total

1.  Attentional selection in visual perception, memory and action: a quest for cross-domain integration.

Authors:  Werner X Schneider; Wolfgang Einhäuser; Gernot Horstmann
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2013-09-09       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Rhythmic modulation of visual contrast discrimination triggered by action.

Authors:  Alessandro Benedetto; Donatella Spinelli; M Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2016-05-25       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 3.  A Rhythmic Theory of Attention.

Authors:  Ian C Fiebelkorn; Sabine Kastner
Journal:  Trends Cogn Sci       Date:  2018-12-24       Impact factor: 20.229

4.  Rhythmic oscillations of visual contrast sensitivity synchronized with action.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Donatella Spinelli; Marco Jacono; Giulio Sandini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-06       Impact factor: 6.167

5.  Attention modulates trans-saccadic integration.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Alexander C Schütz
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2017-12-07       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Theta oscillations locked to intended actions rhythmically modulate perception.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Luca Ambrogioni; W Pieter Medendorp; Eric Maris
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-07       Impact factor: 8.140

7.  Independent Effects of Eye and Hand Movements on Visual Working Memory.

Authors:  Nina M Hanning; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2018-08-17

8.  The spatial and temporal properties of attentional selectivity for saccades and reaches.

Authors:  Emma E M Stewart; Preeti Verghese; Anna Ma-Wyatt
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 2.240

9.  Perceived visual time depends on motor preparation and direction of hand movements.

Authors:  Alice Tomassini; Maria Concetta Morrone
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-06-10       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Independent selection of eye and hand targets suggests effector-specific attentional mechanisms.

Authors:  Nina M Hanning; David Aagten-Murphy; Heiner Deubel
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.