Literature DB >> 16086144

Biasing the brain's attentional set: I. cue driven deployments of intersensory selective attention.

John J Foxe1, Gregory V Simpson, Seppo P Ahlfors, Clifford D Saron.   

Abstract

Brain activity associated with directing attention to one of two possible sensory modalities was examined using high-density mapping of human event-related potentials. The deployment of selective attention was based on visually presented symbolic cue-words instructing subjects on a trial-by-trial basis, which sensory modality to attend. We measured the spatio-temporal pattern of activation in the approximately 1 second period between the cue-instruction and a subsequent compound auditory-visual imperative stimulus. This allowed us to assess the flow of processing across brain regions involved in deploying and sustaining inter-sensory selective attention, prior to the actual selective processing of the compound audio-visual target stimulus. Activity over frontal and parietal areas showed sensory specific increases in activation during the early part of the anticipatory period (~230 ms), probably representing the activation of fronto-parietal attentional deployment systems for top-down control of attention. In the later period preceding the arrival of the "to-be-attended" stimulus, sustained differential activity was seen over fronto-central regions and parieto-occipital regions, suggesting the maintenance of sensory-specific biased attentional states that would allow for subsequent selective processing. Although there was clear sensory biasing in this late sustained period, it was also clear that both sensory systems were being prepared during the cue-target period. These late sensory-specific biasing effects were also accompanied by sustained activations over frontal cortices that also showed both common and sensory specific activation patterns, suggesting that maintenance of the biased state includes top-down inputs from generators in frontal cortices, some of which are sensory-specific regions. These data support extensive interactions between sensory, parietal and frontal regions during processing of cue information, deployment of attention, and maintenance of the focus of attention in anticipation of impending attentionally relevant input.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16086144     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-005-2378-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  118 in total

1.  The physiological basis of attentional modulation in extrastriate visual areas.

Authors:  D Chawla; G Rees; K J Friston
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  ERP manifestations of processing printed words at different psycholinguistic levels: time course and scalp distribution.

Authors:  S Bentin; Y Mouchetant-Rostaing; M H Giard; J F Echallier; J Pernier
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Prospective coding for objects in primate prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  G Rainer; S C Rao; E K Miller
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-07-01       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Task switching: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  G R Wylie; D C Javitt; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  American Electroencephalographic Society guidelines for standard electrode position nomenclature.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 2.177

6.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

Review 7.  Attentional networks.

Authors:  M I Posner; S Dehaene
Journal:  Trends Neurosci       Date:  1994-02       Impact factor: 13.837

8.  Modulation of auditory and visual cortex by selective attention is modality-dependent.

Authors:  P W Woodruff; R R Benson; P A Bandettini; K K Kwong; R J Howard; T Talavage; J Belliveau; B R Rosen
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1996-08-12       Impact factor: 1.837

9.  Visual, presaccadic, and cognitive activation of single neurons in monkey lateral intraparietal area.

Authors:  C L Colby; J R Duhamel; M E Goldberg
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Bilateral activation of fronto-parietal networks by incrementing demand in a working memory task.

Authors:  T Klingberg; B T O'Sullivan; P E Roland
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.357

View more
  20 in total

1.  Masker location uncertainty reveals evidence for suppression of maskers in two-talker contexts.

Authors:  Kachina Allen; David Alais; Barbara Shinn-Cunningham; Simon Carlile
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Throwing out the rules: anticipatory alpha-band oscillatory attention mechanisms during task-set reconfigurations.

Authors:  John J Foxe; Jeremy W Murphy; Pierfilippo De Sanctis
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 3.  Attention and prediction in human audition: a lesson from cognitive psychophysiology.

Authors:  Erich Schröger; Anna Marzecová; Iria SanMiguel
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.386

Review 4.  Does attention play a role in dynamic receptive field adaptation to changing acoustic salience in A1?

Authors:  Jonathan B Fritz; Mounya Elhilali; Stephen V David; Shihab A Shamma
Journal:  Hear Res       Date:  2007-01-16       Impact factor: 3.208

5.  Differential functional roles of slow-wave and oscillatory-α activity in visual sensory cortex during anticipatory visual-spatial attention.

Authors:  Tineke Grent-'t-Jong; C Nicolas Boehler; J Leon Kenemans; Marty G Woldorff
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2011-03-03       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Updating of context in working memory: an event-related potential study.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Rafael Escobedo-Quiroz; Jonathan D Cohen
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Interests shape how adolescents pay attention: the interaction of motivation and top-down attentional processes in biasing sensory activations to anticipated events.

Authors:  Snigdha Banerjee; Hans-Peter Frey; Sophie Molholm; John J Foxe
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2014-12-26       Impact factor: 3.386

8.  Intermodal auditory, visual, and tactile attention modulates early stages of neural processing.

Authors:  Christina M Karns; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Neurophysiological signals of ignoring and attending are separable and related to performance during sustained intersensory attention.

Authors:  Agatha Lenartowicz; Gregory V Simpson; Catherine M Haber; Mark S Cohen
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Reward contingencies and the recalibration of task monitoring and reward systems: a high-density electrical mapping study.

Authors:  K P Morie; P De Sanctis; J J Foxe
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2014-05-14       Impact factor: 3.590

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.