Literature DB >> 10718066

Interactions between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention.

M Schmitt1, A Postma, E De Haan.   

Abstract

Six experiments were carried out to investigate the issue of cross-modality between exogenous auditory and visual spatial attention employing Posner's cueing paradigm in detection, localization, and discrimination tasks. Results indicated cueing in detection tasks with visual or auditory cues and visual targets but not with auditory targets (Experiment 1). In the localization tasks, cueing was found with both visual and auditory targets. Inhibition of return was apparent only in the within-modality conditions (Experiment 2). This suggests that it is important whether the attention system is activated directly (within a modality) or indirectly (between modalities). Increasing the cue validity from 50% to 80% influenced performance only in the localization task (Experiment 4). These findings are interpreted as being indicative for modality-specific but interacting attention mechanisms. The results of Experiments 5 and 6 (up/down discrimination tasks) also show cross-modal cueing but not with visual cues and auditory targets. Furthermore, there was no inhibition of return in any condition. This suggests that some cueing effects might be task dependent.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 10718066     DOI: 10.1080/713755882

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A        ISSN: 0272-4987


  19 in total

1.  Space-independent modality-driven attentional capture in auditory, tactile and visual systems.

Authors:  Massimo Turatto; Giovanni Galfano; Bruce Bridgeman; Carlo Umiltà
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-12-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye-gaze and arrow cues influence elementary sound perception.

Authors:  Jeremy I Borjon; Stephen V Shepherd; Alexander Todorov; Asif A Ghazanfar
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-12-08       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Interruption from irrelevant auditory and visual onsets even when attention is in a focused state.

Authors:  Rob H J van der Lubbe; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-23       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Spatial attention triggered by unimodal, crossmodal, and bimodal exogenous cues: a comparison of reflexive orienting mechanisms.

Authors:  Valerio Santangelo; Rob H J Van der Lubbe; Marta Olivetti Belardinelli; Albert Postma
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Cross-modal attention capture by affective stimuli: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  Andreas Keil; Margaret M Bradley; Markus Junghöfer; Thomas Russmann; Wiliam Lowenthal; Peter J Lang
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.282

6.  Integration of auditory and visual information in the recognition of realistic objects.

Authors:  Clara Suied; Nicolas Bonneel; Isabelle Viaud-Delmon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-12-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Neuronal modulation of auditory attention by informative and uninformative spatial cues.

Authors:  Andrew R Mayer; Alexandre R Franco; Deborah L Harrington
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 5.038

8.  An event-related FMRI study of exogenous orienting across vision and audition.

Authors:  Zhen Yang; Andrew R Mayer
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2013-01-03       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 9.  Multisensory integration in migraine.

Authors:  Todd J Schwedt
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 5.710

10.  Rhythm Violation Enhances Auditory-Evoked Responses to the Extent of Overriding Sensory Adaptation in Passive Listening.

Authors:  Melisa Menceloglu; Marcia Grabowecky; Satoru Suzuki
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2020-05-19       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.