Literature DB >> 14651293

Number-of-features effects and semantic processing.

Penny M Pexman1, Gregory G Holyk, Marie-H Monfils.   

Abstract

Participants list many semantic features for some concrete nouns (e.g., lion) and fewer for others (e.g., lime; McRae, de Sa, & Seidenberg, 1997). Pexman, Lupker, and Hino (2002) reported faster lexical decision and naming responses for high number of features (NOF) words than for low-NOF words. In the present research, we investigated the impact of NOF on semantic processing. We observed NOF effects in a self-paced reading task when prior context was not congruent with the target word (Experiment 1) and in a semantic categorization task (concrete vs. abstract; Experiment 2A). When we narrowed our stimuli to include high- and low-NOF words from a single category (birds), we found substantial NOF effects that were modulated by the specificity of the categorization task (Experiments 3A, 3B, and 3C). We argue that these results provide support for distributed representation of word meaning.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14651293     DOI: 10.3758/bf03196439

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  24 in total

1.  Connectionist modelling in psychology: a localist manifesto.

Authors:  M Page
Journal:  Behav Brain Sci       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 12.579

2.  Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.

Authors:  Yasushi Hino; Stephen J Lupker; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 3.051

Review 3.  Word identification in reading and the promise of subsymbolic psycholinguistics.

Authors:  G C Van Orden; B F Pennington; G O Stone
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 8.934

4.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning.

Authors:  K McRae; V R de Sa; M S Seidenberg
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Gen       Date:  1997-06

Review 5.  Computational modeling and elementary process analysis in visual word recognition.

Authors:  K I Forster
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  1994-12       Impact factor: 3.332

6.  Semantic context effects in visual word recognition: an analysis of semantic strategies.

Authors:  C A Becker
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1980-11

7.  An activation--verification model for letter and word recognition: the word-superiority effect.

Authors:  K R Paap; S L Newsome; J E McDonald; R W Schvaneveldt
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1982-09       Impact factor: 8.934

Review 8.  Lesioning an attractor network: investigations of acquired dyslexia.

Authors:  G E Hinton; T Shallice
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 8.934

9.  Deep dyslexia, imageability, and ease of predication.

Authors:  G V Jones
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1985-01       Impact factor: 2.381

10.  A distributed, developmental model of word recognition and naming.

Authors:  M S Seidenberg; J L McClelland
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1989-10       Impact factor: 8.934

View more
  29 in total

1.  Perceptual and motor attribute ratings for 559 object concepts.

Authors:  Ben D Amsel; Thomas P Urbach; Marta Kutas
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2012-12

2.  Typicality effects in contingency-shaped generalized equivalence classes.

Authors:  Mark Galizio; Katherine L Stewart; Carol Pilgrim
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Attractor dynamics and semantic neighborhood density: processing is slowed by near neighbors and speeded by distant neighbors.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman; James S Magnuson
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  There are many ways to be rich: effects of three measures of semantic richness on visual word recognition.

Authors:  Penny M Pexman; Ian S Hargreaves; Paul D Siakaluk; Glen E Bodner; Jamie Pope
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-02

5.  Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.

Authors:  Melvin J Yap; Sarah E Tan; Penny M Pexman; Ian S Hargreaves
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2011-08

6.  Effects of near and distant semantic neighbors on word production.

Authors:  Daniel Mirman
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Semantic Richness and Aging: The Effect of Number of Features in the Lexical Decision Task.

Authors:  Christelle Robert; Liliana Rico Duarte
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2016-04

8.  Cross-language translation priming asymmetry with Chinese-English bilinguals: a test of the Sense Model.

Authors:  Baoguo Chen; Huixia Zhou; Yiwen Gao; Susan Dunlap
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-06

9.  Treatment of category generation and retrieval in aphasia: effect of typicality of category items.

Authors:  Swathi Kiran; Chaleece Sandberg; Rajani Sebastian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2010-12-20       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Semantic richness and the activation of concepts in semantic memory: evidence from event-related potentials.

Authors:  John Kounios; Deborah L Green; Lisa Payne; Jessica I Fleck; Ray Grondin; Ken McRae
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2009-06-06       Impact factor: 3.252

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.