Literature DB >> 21494916

Is more always better? Effects of semantic richness on lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification.

Melvin J Yap1, Sarah E Tan, Penny M Pexman, Ian S Hargreaves.   

Abstract

Evidence from large-scale studies (Pexman, Hargreaves, Siakaluk, Bodner, & Pope, 2008) suggests that semantic richness, a multidimensional construct reflecting the extent of variability in the information associated with a word's meaning, facilitates visual word recognition. Specifically, recognition is better for words that (1) have more semantic neighbors, (2) possess referents with more features, and (3) are associated with more contexts. The present study extends Pexman et al. (2008) by examining how two additional measures of semantic richness, number of senses and number of associates (Pexman, Hargreaves, Edwards, Henry, & Goodyear, 2007), influence lexical decision, speeded pronunciation, and semantic classification performance, after controlling for an array of lexical and semantic variables. We found that number of features and contexts consistently facilitated word recognition but that the effects of semantic neighborhood density and number of associates were less robust. Words with more senses also elicited faster lexical decisions but less accurate semantic classifications. These findings point to how the effects of different semantic dimensions are selectively and adaptively modulated by task-specific demands.

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21494916     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-011-0092-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  20 in total

1.  Cross-modal repetition priming of heterographic homophones.

Authors:  J Grainger; M N Van Kang; J Segui
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2001-01

2.  Characterizing semantic space: neighborhood effects in word recognition.

Authors:  L Buchanan; C Westbury; C Burgess
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2001-09

3.  Semantic ambiguity and the process of generating meaning from print.

Authors:  Penny M Pexman; Yasushi Hino; Stephen J Lupker
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 3.051

4.  Phonological neighbors speed visual word processing: evidence from multiple tasks.

Authors:  Mark Yates
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.051

5.  Evidence for the activation of sensorimotor information during visual word recognition: the body-object interaction effect.

Authors:  Paul D Siakaluk; Penny M Pexman; Laura Aguilera; William J Owen; Christopher R Sears
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2007-01-26

6.  Semantic feature production norms for a large set of living and nonliving things.

Authors:  Ken McRae; George S Cree; Mark S Seidenberg; Chris McNorgan
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2005-11

7.  Moving beyond Coltheart's N: a new measure of orthographic similarity.

Authors:  Tal Yarkoni; David Balota; Melvin Yap
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-10

8.  NoA's Ark: influence of the number of associates in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Jon Andoni Duñabeitia; Alberto Avilés; Manuel Carreiras
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

9.  Moving beyond Kucera and Francis: a critical evaluation of current word frequency norms and the introduction of a new and improved word frequency measure for American English.

Authors:  Marc Brysbaert; Boris New
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2009-11

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more
  32 in total

1.  The influence of contextual diversity on eye movements in reading.

Authors:  Patrick Plummer; Manuel Perea; Keith Rayner
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn       Date:  2013-08-12       Impact factor: 3.051

2.  The ERP signature of the contextual diversity effect in visual word recognition.

Authors:  Marta Vergara-Martínez; Montserrat Comesaña; Manuel Perea
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2017-06       Impact factor: 3.282

3.  Grasping the invisible: semantic processing of abstract words.

Authors:  Lenka Zdrazilova; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2013-12

4.  Bigram frequency, number of syllables and morphemes and their effects on lexical decision and word naming.

Authors:  Steven J Muncer; David Knight; John W Adams
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2014-06

5.  Remote semantic memory is impoverished in hippocampal amnesia.

Authors:  Nathaniel B Klooster; Melissa C Duff
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 3.139

6.  The effect of contextual diversity on eye movements in Chinese sentence reading.

Authors:  Qingrong Chen; Xin Huang; Le Bai; Xiaodong Xu; Yiming Yang; Michael K Tanenhaus
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2017-04

7.  Semantic size does not matter: "bigger" words are not recognized faster.

Authors:  Sean H K Kang; Melvin J Yap; Chi-Shing Tse; Christopher A Kurby
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol (Hove)       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 2.143

8.  Dough, tough, cough, rough: A "fast" fMRI localizer of component processes in reading.

Authors:  Jeffrey G Malins; Nina Gumkowski; Bonnie Buis; Peter Molfese; Jay G Rueckl; Stephen J Frost; Kenneth R Pugh; Robin Morris; W Einar Mencl
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  Communicating abstract meaning: concepts revealed in words and gestures.

Authors:  Lenka Zdrazilova; David M Sidhu; Penny M Pexman
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-08-05       Impact factor: 6.237

10.  It's all in the delivery: Effects of context valence, arousal, and concreteness on visual word processing.

Authors:  Bryor Snefjella; Victor Kuperman
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2016-08-24
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.