Literature DB >> 14646769

Long-term results of low contact stress mobile-bearing total knee replacements.

Chun-Hsiung Huang1, Hon-Ming Ma, Ye-Ming Lee, Fang-Yuan Ho.   

Abstract

Five hundred ninety-eight consecutive primary low contact stress total knee replacements were done in 502 patients between 1985 and 1990. Clinical review was available for 495 knees (406 patients), 228 knees with meniscal-bearing prostheses and 267 knees with rotating-platform prostheses. The average followup was 12 years (range, 10-15 years). The average postoperative knee and functional scores were 87 points and 75 points, respectively. The average postoperative range of motion was 110 degrees. Fifty-six knees (11%) required revision for excessive wear of the tibial insert (41), dislocation (10), patellar polyethylene breakage (one), component loosening (one patellar, one tibial), and infection (two). During revision, osteolysis (20 knees), patellar polyethylene failure (33), and femoral component fracture (one) were seen. The overall survivorship was 88.1% at 15 years using Kaplan-Meier analysis. The survival rate was 83% for the meniscal-bearing prostheses and 92.1% for the rotating-platform prostheses. The Low Contact Stress mobile-bearing knee prosthesis has no superiority over that of fixed-bearing knees, especially for the meniscal-bearing design in prevention of polyethylene failure or revision. Based on the results of this study, the use of the LCS meniscal-bearing prosthesis does not appear to be justified.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14646769     DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000093890.12372.46

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res        ISSN: 0009-921X            Impact factor:   4.176


  17 in total

1.  Do "premium" joint implants add value?: analysis of high cost joint implants in a community registry.

Authors:  Terence J Gioe; Amit Sharma; Penny Tatman; Susan Mehle
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 2.  [Axial correction in knee revision arthroplasty].

Authors:  C Perka; S Tohtz; G Matziolis
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  Two-year follow-up on joint stability and muscular function comparing rotating versus fixed bearing TKR.

Authors:  C Luring; H Bathis; F Oczipka; C Trepte; H Lufen; L Perlick; J Grifka
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-12-14       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Mid-term results with a highly congruous mobile-bearing knee prosthesis.

Authors:  Roger G Lemaire
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-08-22       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Brief followup report: Does high-flexion total knee arthroplasty allow deep flexion safely in Asian patients?

Authors:  Hyuk-Soo Han; Seung-Baik Kang
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 4.176

6.  Toward the interpretation of the combined effect of size and body weight on the tribological performance of total knee prostheses.

Authors:  Santina Battaglia; Paola Taddei; Silvia Tozzi; Alessandra Sudanese; Saverio Affatato
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-02-26       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  Unconstrained total knee arthroplasty in significant valgus deformity: a modified surgical technique to balance the knee and avoid instability.

Authors:  R Pagoti; S O'Brien; E Doran; D Beverland
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2015-11-28       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  Comparison of long-term clinical outcomes after bilateral mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasties using PCL-retaining and PCL-substituting implants in the same patients.

Authors:  Yoshinori Ishii; Hideo Noguchi; Junko Sato; Tetsuya Sakurai; Shin-Ichi Toyabe
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2016-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

9.  NexGen LPS rotating platform total knee arthroplasty: medium-term results of a prospective study.

Authors:  Roberto Rossi; Andrea Ferro; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Giacomo Garzaro; Filippo Castoldi
Journal:  Chir Organi Mov       Date:  2009-04-29

10.  No clinical benefit of titanium nitride coating in cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Ruud P van Hove; Richard M Brohet; Barend J van Royen; Peter A Nolte
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2014-10-05       Impact factor: 4.342

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.