Literature DB >> 14631527

[The prosthesis nail -- a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur].

A Probst1, T Schneider, S Hankemeier, E Brug.   

Abstract

Increasing numbers of total hip arthroplasties in combination with increasing age and growing daily activities of the elderly lead to increasing numbers of periprosthetic fractures and revision arthroplasties in osteoporotic bone. The prosthesis nail is a hybrid of a hip prosthesis and an intramedullary nail allowing immediate full weight bearing and early rehabilitation. The prosthesis nail consists of three self-locking components: a distally locked intramedullary nail, different lengthening modules, and a hip prosthesis module. From 1992 to 1999, 28 prosthesis nails were implanted in 26 patients (40-88 years, mean age: 71 years). The indications were 21 peri- and subprosthetic fractures caused by trauma, 2 fractures of the proximal femur in combination with a fracture of the femoral head or severe degenerative arthritis, and 4 revision arthroplasties associated with poor bone quality. A combination of the prosthesis nail and bone cement was used in one patient suffering from a pathological fracture of the distal femur. Patients were additionally treated with wire cerclage (six patients) and autogenous bone grafting (ten patients). All patients-except those who received a reconstruction of the acetabulum in the same session (four patients)-were mobilized with full weight bearing on the operated side as soon as wound pain diminished. Bone healing was observed in all periprosthetic fractures. In three patients the prosthesis nail had to be revised: one patient suffered from recurrent dislocations and in one patient weighing 350 pounds limb shortening occurred after the distal locking screw broke. Intramedullary infection was observed once after treatment of a periprosthetic fracture. When bone union was achieved the prosthesis nail was removed and the patient was mobilized with a girdlestone situation. The idea of the prosthesis nail is based on the logical consequence of treating femur fractures with the most efficient procedure, which is intramedullary nailing. The prosthesis nail can be applied according to the requirements of the fracture as a reamed or unreamed nail and immediate full weight bearing is possible. Considering the high average age of the patients, low morbidity, short rehabilitation time, and low costs are the major advantages of this new device. Taking into account the unfavorable preoperative conditions associated with elderly and multimorbid patients, the rate of complications is relatively low.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14631527     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-003-0621-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  59 in total

1.  Treatment of fracture of the shaft of the femur in total hip arthroplasty by a combination of a Küntscher nail and a modified cemented Charnley stem.

Authors:  B M Wroblewski; A O Browne; J P Hodgkinson
Journal:  Injury       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.586

2.  [Femoral fractures following total hip prosthesis].

Authors:  K Zuber; P Koch; A Lustenberger; R Ganz
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1990-10       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Uncemented revision stem for biological osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  C Eingartner; R Volkmann; M Pütz; S Weller
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Conservative treatment of femoral shaft fractures in patients with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J F Somers; R Suy; J Stuyck; M Mulier; G Fabry
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.757

5.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

6.  [Possibilities of therapy of femur fractures following placement a of total hip endoprosthesis].

Authors:  L Bernd; K Bläsius; H Cotta
Journal:  Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb       Date:  1989 May-Jun

7.  Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  P Adolphson; U Jonsson; R Kalén
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1987

8.  Treatment of proximal femur fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H Montijo; F R Ebert; D A Lennox
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.757

9.  Femoral fracture following hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  H O Fredin; H Lindberg; A S Carlsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1987-02

10.  Fractures of the proximal femur in patients with total hip endoprostheses.

Authors:  P Ritschl; R Kotz
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1986
View more
  13 in total

1.  Primary cementless hip arthroplasty as a potential risk factor for non-union after long-stem revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Marc Michel; Marcus Hofbauer; Patrick Platzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  [Intramedullary nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures after revision for total knee endoprosthesis. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by inserted knee endoprostheis with intramedullary shaft by in situ lengthening of the prosthesis with specially prepared slotted hollow nails].

Authors:  C Meyer; V Alt; C Heiss; R Kraus; G Szalay; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  [Periprosthetic fractures after total hip arthroplasty : classification, diagnosis and therapy strategies].

Authors:  B M Holzapfel; P M Prodinger; M Hoberg; R Meffert; M Rudert; R Gradinger
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 4.  [Trauma surgery in the elderly].

Authors:  H R Siebert; A Beck
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  [Patients with periprosthetic femur fractures and consecutive stem replacement. Analysis of survival, complications, and quality of life].

Authors:  R Langenhan; P Trobisch; B Hohendorff; M Baumann; A Probst
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.000

6.  [Periprosthetic fractures. Long-term results after plate osteosynthesis stabilization].

Authors:  M Rupprecht; L Grossterlinden; F Barvencik; M Gebauer; D Briem; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 7.  Periprosthetic femoral fractures--incidence, classification problems and the proposal of a modified classification scheme.

Authors:  Stephan Frenzel; Vilmos Vécsei; Lukas Negrin
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 8.  [Periprosthetic fractures: classification, management, therapy].

Authors:  A Gruner; T Hockertz; H Reilmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  [Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis].

Authors:  M Rupprecht; C Schlickewei; F Fensky; M Morlock; K Püschel; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  [Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty with specially constructed retrograde hollow nails].

Authors:  G Szalay; C Meyer; J Mika; R Schnettler; U Thormann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.154

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.