Literature DB >> 18587547

[Periprosthetic fractures. Long-term results after plate osteosynthesis stabilization].

M Rupprecht1, L Grossterlinden, F Barvencik, M Gebauer, D Briem, J M Rueger, W Lehmann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Due to the increasing age of patients and the rising number of joint replacements, the incidence of periprosthetic fractures (PPF) is also increasing. The treatment should be selected with knowledge of the prefracture interface status and the type of fracture involved. The aim of this study was to evaluate our treatment of PPF with long-term follow-up. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1988 to 2006, 99 patients with PPF were treated in our department. In 86 cases a plate osteosynthesis was used. After a mean time of 7.3+/-2.8 years, we studied 56 patients and monitored their complications.
RESULTS: The most diagnosed fracture was Johansson type III (44%). Seventy-one patients were treated with a conventional and 15 with locking-plate osteosynthesis. In 15 cases (17.5%) we found severe complications (3 breaks and 3 dislocations of the plates, 6 cases of pseudarthrosis, 2 deep wound infections, and 1 case of postoperative bleeding).
CONCLUSION: Due to the minor frequency of severe complications, plate osteosynthesis of a periprosthetic fracture with a loosened interface is a good therapeutic option for individual patients, particularly for geriatric patients and those without disorders specific to a loosened interface.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18587547     DOI: 10.1007/s00113-008-1470-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Unfallchirurg        ISSN: 0177-5537            Impact factor:   1.000


  25 in total

Review 1.  [Anchoring principles in hip endoprostheses. I: Prosthesis stem].

Authors:  S J Breusch; P R Aldinger; M Thomsen; V Ewerbeck; M Lukoschek
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 1.000

2.  [Replacement of hip prostheses--technical aspects and personal results].

Authors:  T Peterson; U Riester; H Wissing
Journal:  Unfallchirurgie       Date:  1996-08

3.  Femoral shaft fracture after hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J S Jensen; G Barfod; D Hansen; E Larsen; F Linde; H Menck; B Olsen
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1988-02

4.  Young age and wedge stem design are risk factors for periprosthetic fracture after arthroplasty due to hip fracture. A case-control study.

Authors:  Roope Sarvilinna; Heini Huhtala; Jorma Pajamäki
Journal:  Acta Orthop       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.717

5.  [Periprosthetic femur shaft fracture. Indications and outcome in 51 patients].

Authors:  A Siegmeth; W Menth-Chiari; G E Wozasek; V Vécsei
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 6.  Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after hip arthroplasty. A statistical analysis of outcome based on 487 patients.

Authors:  M A Mont; D C Maar
Journal:  J Arthroplasty       Date:  1994-10       Impact factor: 4.757

7.  Intraoperative femur fractures during total hip replacement.

Authors:  M M Taylor; M H Meyers; J P Harvey
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1978 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 9.  [Periprosthetic fractures: classification, management, therapy].

Authors:  A Gruner; T Hockertz; H Reilmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.000

10.  Proximal femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J S Bethea; J R DeAndrade; L L Fleming; S D Lindenbaum; R B Welch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

View more
  8 in total

1.  [Conventional plate osteosynthesis].

Authors:  K Klaue
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  Plate failure following plate osteosynthesis in periprosthetic femoral fractures.

Authors:  Sandra Boesmueller; Sebastian F Baumbach; Marcus Hofbauer; Gerald E Wozasek
Journal:  Wien Klin Wochenschr       Date:  2015-06-18       Impact factor: 1.704

3.  [Intramedullary nailing of periprosthetic femoral fractures after revision for total knee endoprosthesis. Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures by inserted knee endoprostheis with intramedullary shaft by in situ lengthening of the prosthesis with specially prepared slotted hollow nails].

Authors:  C Meyer; V Alt; C Heiss; R Kraus; G Szalay; R Schnettler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 4.  [Periprosthetic fractures. An interdisciplinary challenge].

Authors:  R Stange; M J Raschke; T Fuchs
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 5.  Periprosthetic femoral fracture - an interdisciplinary challenge.

Authors:  Alexander Hagel; Holger Siekmann; Karl-Stefan Delank
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2014-09-26       Impact factor: 5.594

6.  [Periprosthetic and interimplant femoral fractures: Biomechanical analysis].

Authors:  M Rupprecht; C Schlickewei; F Fensky; M Morlock; K Püschel; J M Rueger; W Lehmann
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 1.000

7.  [Treatment of periprosthetic femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty with specially constructed retrograde hollow nails].

Authors:  G Szalay; C Meyer; J Mika; R Schnettler; U Thormann
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-02-19       Impact factor: 1.154

8.  What is the risk of stress risers for interprosthetic fractures of the femur? A biomechanical analysis.

Authors:  Wolfgang Lehmann; Martin Rupprecht; Jacob Nuechtern; Daniel Melzner; Kai Sellenschloh; Jan Kolb; Florian Fensky; Michael Hoffmann; Klaus Püschel; Michael Morlock; Johannes M Rueger
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-07       Impact factor: 3.075

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.