Literature DB >> 3435235

Fractures of the ipsilateral femur after total hip arthroplasty.

P Adolphson1, U Jonsson, R Kalén.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate the predisposing factors, fracture location, treatment, and final outcome of femoral fractures after total hip arthroplasty (THA). From 1975 to 1983, 28 patients were seen with 29 fractures on the same side as the prosthesis. Most of the fractures were caused by minor trauma, and prior hip surgery was the most common predisposing factor. Two patients underwent early operation and six were treated with protected weight bearing. Twenty-one underwent initial skeletal traction, and 14 of these fractures united without further surgery. Six of the patients treated with initial skeletal traction were operated on early, mainly by osteosynthesis, due to poor fracture alignment. Three of these fractures united, but one subsequently required revision arthroplasty because of loosening of the femoral component. Two patients died and three had a permanent pseudarthrosis or a Girdlestone resection. Nineteen of the 21 fractures not operated on united and five of the eight operated united. The results indicate that when good fracture alignment is achieved with traction, union is not jeopardized by either the prosthesis or the cement.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3435235     DOI: 10.1007/BF00456869

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg        ISSN: 0344-8444


  8 in total

1.  Femoral and pelvic fractures after total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  E C McElfresh; M B Coventry
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1974-04       Impact factor: 5.284

2.  Fractures of the femur about femoral endoprostheses.

Authors:  R P Whittaker; L N Sotos; E L Ralston
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1974-08

3.  Revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  B F Kavanagh; D M Ilstrup; R H Fitzgerald
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.284

4.  Long-term results of revision total hip replacement. A follow-up report.

Authors:  P M Pellicci; P D Wilson; C B Sledge; E A Salvati; C S Ranawat; R Poss; J J Callaghan
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1985-04       Impact factor: 5.284

5.  [Postoperative femoral fractures in total endoprosthesis of the hip joint].

Authors:  B Schwarz; J Heisel
Journal:  Unfallheilkunde       Date:  1984-03

6.  The healing of human fractures in contact with self-curing acrylic cement.

Authors:  J Charnley
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1966 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.176

7.  Fracture of the ipsilateral femur in patients wih total hip replacement.

Authors:  J E Johansson; R McBroom; T W Barrington; G A Hunter
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  1981-12       Impact factor: 5.284

8.  Proximal femoral fractures following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  J S Bethea; J R DeAndrade; L L Fleming; S D Lindenbaum; R B Welch
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 4.176

  8 in total
  12 in total

1.  Revision arthroplasty in periprosthetic fractures of the proximal femur.

Authors:  B Fink
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  2014-09-28       Impact factor: 1.154

2.  Management of Vancouver B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using a modular cementless stem without allografting.

Authors:  Daniel Neumann; Christoph Thaler; Ulrich Dorn
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2011-10-09       Impact factor: 3.075

3.  Outcome of periprosthetic femoral fractures following total hip replacement treated with polyaxial locking plate.

Authors:  M F Hoffmann; S Lotzien; T A Schildhauer
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2016-09-06

4.  Management of Vancouver type B2 and B3 femoral periprosthetic fractures using an uncemented extensively porous-coated long femoral stem prosthesis.

Authors:  Kerem Canbora; Ozkan Kose; Atilla Polat; Faruk Aykanat; Mucahit Gorgec
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2012-06-14

5.  [Periprosthetic fractures in patients with rheumatoid arthritis].

Authors:  G Pap; H W Neumann
Journal:  Z Rheumatol       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.372

Review 6.  The management of type B1 periprosthetic femoral fractures: when to fix and when to revise.

Authors:  Adam T Yasen; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2014-12-16       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  The benefit of the systematic revision of the acetabular implant in favor of a dual mobility articulation during the treatment of periprosthetic fractures of the femur: a 49 cases prospective comparative study.

Authors:  A Perrin; M Saab; S Putman; K Benad; E Drumez; C Chantelot
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-09-12

8.  [The prosthesis nail -- a new stable fixation device for periprosthetic fractures and critical fractures of the proximal femur].

Authors:  A Probst; T Schneider; S Hankemeier; E Brug
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Extended trochanteric osteotomy (ETO) fixation for femoral stem revision in periprosthetic fractures: Dall-Miles plate versus cables.

Authors:  Gerard A Sheridan; Adam Galbraith; Stephen R Kearns; William Curtin; Colin G Murphy
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2017-10-20

10.  A review of periprosthetic femoral fractures associated with total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Daniel Marsland; Simon C Mears
Journal:  Geriatr Orthop Surg Rehabil       Date:  2012-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.