Literature DB >> 14619993

Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

Gregory M Palmer1, Changfang Zhu, Tara M Breslin, Fushen Xu, Kennedy W Gilchrist, Nirmala Ramanujam.   

Abstract

Nonmalignant (n = 36) and malignant (n = 20) tissue samples were obtained from breast cancer and breast reduction surgeries. These tissues were characterized using multiple excitation wavelength fluorescence spectroscopy and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy in the ultraviolet-visible wavelength range, immediately after excision. Spectra were then analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) as a data reduction technique. PCA was performed on each fluorescence spectrum, as well as on the diffuse reflectance spectrum individually, to establish a set of principal components for each spectrum. A Wilcoxon rank-sum test was used to determine which principal components show statistically significant differences between malignant and nonmalignant tissues. Finally, a support vector machine (SVM) algorithm was utilized to classify the samples based on the diagnostically useful principal components. Cross-validation of this nonparametric algorithm was carried out to determine its classification accuracy in an unbiased manner. Multiexcitation fluorescence spectroscopy was successful in discriminating malignant and nonmalignant tissues, with a sensitivity and specificity of 70% and 92%, respectively. The sensitivity (30%) and specificity (78%) of diffuse reflectance spectroscopy alone was significantly lower. Combining fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectra did not improve the classification accuracy of an algorithm based on fluorescence spectra alone. The fluorescence excitation-emission wavelengths identified as being diagnostic from the PCA-SVM algorithm suggest that the important fluorophores for breast cancer diagnosis are most likely tryptophan, NAD(P)H and flavoproteins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14619993     DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2003.818488

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  26 in total

1.  Automated classification of breast pathology using local measures of broadband reflectance.

Authors:  Ashley M Laughney; Venkataramanan Krishnaswamy; Pilar Beatriz Garcia-Allende; Olga M Conde; Wendy A Wells; Keith D Paulsen; Brian W Pogue
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2010 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.170

Review 2.  Advances in optical spectroscopy and imaging of breast lesions.

Authors:  Stavros G Demos; Abby J Vogel; Amir H Gandjbakhche
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.673

3.  A robust Monte Carlo model for the extraction of biological absorption and scattering in vivo.

Authors:  Janelle E Bender; Karthik Vishwanath; Laura K Moore; J Quincy Brown; Vivide Chang; Gregory M Palmer; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 4.538

4.  Spectral-domain low coherence interferometry/optical coherence tomography system for fine needle breast biopsy guidance.

Authors:  N V Iftimia; M Mujat; T Ustun; R D Ferguson; V Danthu; D X Hammer
Journal:  Rev Sci Instrum       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.523

5.  Spectral filtering modulation method for estimation of hemoglobin concentration and oxygenation based on a single fluorescence emission spectrum in tissue phantoms.

Authors:  Quan Liu; Tuan Vo-Dinh
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2009-10       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Automated algorithm for breast tissue differentiation in optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Mircea Mujat; R Daniel Ferguson; Daniel X Hammer; Christopher Gittins; Nicusor Iftimia
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2009 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.170

7.  Complementary use of polarization-sensitive and standard OCT metrics for enhanced intraoperative differentiation of breast cancer.

Authors:  Jianfeng Wang; Yang Xu; Kelly J Mesa; Fredrick A South; Eric J Chaney; Darold R Spillman; Ronit Barkalifa; Marina Marjanovic; P Scott Carney; Anna M Higham; Z George Liu; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2018-11-28       Impact factor: 3.732

8.  Autofluorescence spectroscopy for nerve-sparing laser surgery of the head and neck-the influence of laser-tissue interaction.

Authors:  Florian Stelzle; Maximilian Rohde; Max Riemann; Nicolai Oetter; Werner Adler; Katja Tangermann-Gerk; Michael Schmidt; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 3.161

9.  Spectral classifier design with ensemble classifiers and misclassification-rejection: application to elastic-scattering spectroscopy for detection of colonic neoplasia.

Authors:  Eladio Rodriguez-Diaz; David A Castanon; Satish K Singh; Irving J Bigio
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.170

10.  Fluorescence spectroscopy: an adjunct diagnostic tool to image-guided core needle biopsy of the breast.

Authors:  Changfang Zhu; Elizabeth S Burnside; Gale A Sisney; Lonie R Salkowski; Josephine M Harter; Bing Yu; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 4.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.