Literature DB >> 28551764

Autofluorescence spectroscopy for nerve-sparing laser surgery of the head and neck-the influence of laser-tissue interaction.

Florian Stelzle1,2, Maximilian Rohde1,2, Max Riemann1, Nicolai Oetter1, Werner Adler3, Katja Tangermann-Gerk4, Michael Schmidt2,4,5, Christian Knipfer6,7.   

Abstract

The use of remote optical feedback systems represents a promising approach for minimally invasive, nerve-sparing laser surgery. Autofluorescence properties can be exploited for a fast, robust identification of nervous tissue. With regard to the crucial step towards clinical application, the impact of laser ablation on optical properties in the vicinity of structures of the head and neck has not been investigated up to now. We acquired 24,298 autofluorescence spectra from 135 tissue samples (nine ex vivo tissue types from 15 bisected pig heads) both before and after ER:YAG laser ablation. Sensitivities, specificities, and area under curve(AUC) values for each tissue pair as well as the confusion matrix were statistically calculated for pre-ablation and post-ablation autofluorescence spectra using principal component analysis (PCA), quadratic discriminant analysis (QDA), and receiver operating characteristics (ROC). The confusion matrix indicated a highly successful tissue discrimination rate before laser exposure, with an average classification error of 5.2%. The clinically relevant tissue pairs nerve/cancellous bone and nerve/salivary gland yielded an AUC of 100% each. After laser ablation, tissue discrimination was feasible with an average classification accuracy of 92.1% (average classification error 7.9%). The identification of nerve versus cancellous bone and salivary gland performed very well with an AUC of 100 and 99%, respectively. Nerve-sparing laser surgery in the area of the head and neck by means of an autofluorescence-based feedback system is feasible even after ER-YAG laser-tissue interactions. These results represent a crucial step for the development of a clinically applicable feedback tool for laser surgery interventions in the oral and maxillofacial region.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Autofluorescence; Laser surgery; Laser-tissue interaction; Optical sensor; Remote feedback; Tissue discrimination

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28551764     DOI: 10.1007/s10103-017-2240-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Lasers Med Sci        ISSN: 0268-8921            Impact factor:   3.161


  41 in total

1.  Optical properties of selected native and coagulated human brain tissues in vitro in the visible and near infrared spectral range.

Authors:  A N Yaroslavsky; P C Schulze; I V Yaroslavsky; R Schober; F Ulrich; H J Schwarzmaier
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2002-06-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  In vivo optical tissue differentiation by diffuse reflectance spectroscopy: preliminary results for tissue-specific laser surgery.

Authors:  Florian Stelzle; Werner Adler; Azhar Zam; Katja Tangermann-Gerk; Christian Knipfer; Alexandre Douplik; Michael Schmidt; Emeka Nkenke
Journal:  Surg Innov       Date:  2012-02-15       Impact factor: 2.058

3.  Er:YAG laser ablation of tissue: measurement of ablation rates.

Authors:  J T Walsh; T F Deutsch
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 4.025

4.  Optimal excitation wavelengths for in vivo detection of oral neoplasia using fluorescence spectroscopy.

Authors:  D L Heintzelman; U Utzinger; H Fuchs; A Zuluaga; K Gossage; A M Gillenwater; R Jacob; B Kemp; R R Richards-Kortum
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 3.421

5.  A comparative study of normal inspection, autofluorescence and 5-ALA-induced PPIX fluorescence for oral cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  Christian S Betz; Herbert Stepp; Philip Janda; Susanne Arbogast; Gerhard Grevers; Reinhold Baumgartner; Andreas Leunig
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2002-01-10       Impact factor: 7.396

Review 6.  Systematic review of the incidence of inferior alveolar nerve injury in bilateral sagittal split osteotomy and the assessment of neurosensory disturbances.

Authors:  J O Agbaje; A S Salem; I Lambrichts; R Jacobs; C Politis
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2014-12-09       Impact factor: 2.789

7.  Laser-induced autofluorescence for medical diagnosis.

Authors:  K Koenig; H Schneckenburger
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  1994-03       Impact factor: 2.217

8.  Fluorescence spectroscopy as tool for bone development monitoring in newborn rats.

Authors:  Zofia Krystyna Drzazga; Aneta Kluczewska-Gałka; Anna Michnik; Michał Kaszuba; Hanna Trzeciak
Journal:  J Fluoresc       Date:  2010-01-13       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Changfang Zhu; Tara M Breslin; Fushen Xu; Kennedy W Gilchrist; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.538

10.  Does Laser Surgery Interfere with Optical Nerve Identification in Maxillofacial Hard and Soft Tissue?--An Experimental Ex Vivo Study.

Authors:  Bastian Bergauer; Christian Knipfer; Andreas Amann; Maximilian Rohde; Katja Tangermann-Gerk; Werner Adler; Michael Schmidt; Emeka Nkenke; Florian Stelzle
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2015-10-01       Impact factor: 3.576

View more
  1 in total

1.  Nerve spectroscopy: understanding peripheral nerve autofluorescence through photodynamics.

Authors:  Fernando Dip; Rene Aleman; Mariano Socolovsky; Nerina Villalba; Jorge Falco; Emanuele Lo Menzo; Kevin P White; Raul J Rosenthal
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-03-29       Impact factor: 4.584

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.