Literature DB >> 31065446

Complementary use of polarization-sensitive and standard OCT metrics for enhanced intraoperative differentiation of breast cancer.

Jianfeng Wang1, Yang Xu1,2, Kelly J Mesa1,2, Fredrick A South1,2, Eric J Chaney1, Darold R Spillman1, Ronit Barkalifa1, Marina Marjanovic1, P Scott Carney1,2, Anna M Higham3, Z George Liu3, Stephen A Boppart1,2,4,5.   

Abstract

We report the development and implementation of an intraoperative polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography (PS-OCT) system for enhancing breast cancer detection. A total of 3440 PS-OCT images were intraoperatively acquired from 9 human breast specimens diagnosed by H&amp;E histology as healthy fibro-adipose tissue (n = 2), healthy stroma (n = 2), or invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC, n = 5). A standard OCT-based metric (coefficient of variation (CV)) and PS-OCT-based metrics sensitive to biological tissue from birefringence (i.e., retardation and degree of polarization uniformity (DOPU)) were derived from 398 statistically different and independent images selected by correlation coefficient analysis. We found the standard OCT-based metric and PS-OCT-based metrics were complementary for the differentiation of healthy fibro-adipose tissue, healthy stroma, and IDC. While the CV of fibro-adipose tissue was significantly higher (p<0.001) than those of either stroma or IDC, the CV difference between stroma and IDC was minimal. On the other hand, stroma was associated with significantly higher (p<0.001) retardation and significantly lower (p<0.001) DOPU as compared to IDC. By leveraging the complementary information acquired by the intraoperative PS-OCT system, healthy fibro-adipose tissue, healthy stroma, and IDC can be differentiated with an accuracy of 89.4%, demonstrating the potential of PS-OCT as an adjunct modality for enhanced intraoperative differentiation of human breast cancer.

Entities:  

Year:  2018        PMID: 31065446      PMCID: PMC6490989          DOI: 10.1364/BOE.9.006519

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biomed Opt Express        ISSN: 2156-7085            Impact factor:   3.732


  29 in total

Review 1.  Optical coherence tomography: feasibility for basic research and image-guided surgery of breast cancer.

Authors:  Stephen A Boppart; Wei Luo; Daniel L Marks; Keith W Singletary
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 4.872

2.  Computational methods for analysis of human breast tumor tissue in optical coherence tomography images.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  J Biomed Opt       Date:  2006 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 3.170

3.  Two-dimensional birefringence imaging in biological tissue by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  J F de Boer; T E Milner; M J van Gemert; J S Nelson
Journal:  Opt Lett       Date:  1997-06-15       Impact factor: 3.776

4.  Intra-operative touch preparation cytology following lumpectomy for breast cancer: a series of 400 procedures.

Authors:  François D'Halluin; Patrick Tas; Sophie Rouquette; Cécile Bendavid; Fabrice Foucher; Habiba Meshba; Jérôme Blanchot; Olivier Coué; Jean Levêque
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2009-06-10       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  Surgical margins in patients with early-stage breast cancer treated with breast conservation therapy.

Authors:  S Eva Singletary
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 2.565

6.  Clinical feasibility of microscopically-guided breast needle biopsy using a fiber-optic probe with computer-aided detection.

Authors:  Adam M Zysk; Freddy T Nguyen; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Patricia A Johnson; Kendrith M Rowland; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-10

7.  Intraoperative evaluation of breast tumor margins with optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Freddy T Nguyen; Adam M Zysk; Eric J Chaney; Jan G Kotynek; Uretz J Oliphant; Frank J Bellafiore; Kendrith M Rowland; Patricia A Johnson; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2009-11-15       Impact factor: 12.701

8.  Intraoperative touch preparation cytology for margin assessment in breast-conservation surgery: does it work for lobular carcinoma?

Authors:  Edna K Valdes; Susan K Boolbol; Irfan Ali; Sheldon M Feldman; Jean-Marc Cohen
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2007-07-14       Impact factor: 5.344

9.  Comparison of multiexcitation fluorescence and diffuse reflectance spectroscopy for the diagnosis of breast cancer (March 2003).

Authors:  Gregory M Palmer; Changfang Zhu; Tara M Breslin; Fushen Xu; Kennedy W Gilchrist; Nirmala Ramanujam
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.538

Review 10.  Imaging in breast cancer: diffuse optics in breast cancer: detecting tumors in pre-menopausal women and monitoring neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Bruce J Tromberg; Albert Cerussi; Natasha Shah; Montana Compton; Amanda Durkin; David Hsiang; John Butler; Rita Mehta
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2005-11-28       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  In vivo evaluation of endometrium through dual-modality intrauterine endoscopy.

Authors:  Jinke Zhang; Meng Du; JInghui Fang; Shengmiao Lv; Wenjin Lou; Zhihua Xie; Zhiyi Chen; Xiaojing Gong
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-04-04       Impact factor: 3.562

2.  En-face polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography to characterize early-stage esophageal cancer and determine tumor margin.

Authors:  Ping-Hsien Chen; Hiu-Ki Lai; Yi-Chen Yeh; Kuo-Wei Chang; Ming-Chih Hou; Wen-Chuan Kuo
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-15       Impact factor: 3.562

3.  Rapid non-destructive volumetric tumor yield assessment in fresh lung core needle biopsies using polarization sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Sreyankar Nandy; Timothy L Helland; Benjamin W Roop; Rebecca A Raphaely; Amy Ly; Madelyn Lew; Sarita R Berigei; Martin Villiger; Anastasia Sorokina; Margit V Szabari; Florian J Fintelmann; Melissa J Suter; Lida P Hariri
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.732

4.  Diagnostic Accuracy of Cross-Polarization OCT and OCT-Elastography for Differentiation of Breast Cancer Subtypes: Comparative Study.

Authors:  Ekaterina V Gubarkova; Elena B Kiseleva; Marina A Sirotkina; Dmitry A Vorontsov; Ksenia A Achkasova; Sergey S Kuznetsov; Konstantin S Yashin; Aleksander L Matveyev; Aleksander A Sovetsky; Lev A Matveev; Anton A Plekhanov; Alexey Y Vorontsov; Vladimir Y Zaitsev; Natalia D Gladkova
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2020-11-24

5.  Longitudinal investigation of a xenograft tumor zebrafish model using polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Antonia Lichtenegger; Junya Tamaoki; Roxane Licandro; Tomoko Mori; Pradipta Mukherjee; Lixuan Bian; Lisa Greutter; Shuichi Makita; Adelheid Wöhrer; Satoshi Matsusaka; Makoto Kobayashi; Bernhard Baumann; Yoshiaki Yasuno
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-09-13       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Evaluating optical coherence tomography for surgical margin assessment of canine mammary tumours.

Authors:  Carolina Fabelo; Laura E Selmic; Pin-Cheh Huang; Jonathan P Samuelson; Jennifer K Reagan; Alexandra Kalamaras; Vincent Wavreille; Guillermo L Monroy; Marina Marjanovic; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  Vet Comp Oncol       Date:  2020-07-26       Impact factor: 2.613

7.  Synthetic polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography by deep learning.

Authors:  Yi Sun; Jianfeng Wang; Jindou Shi; Stephen A Boppart
Journal:  NPJ Digit Med       Date:  2021-07-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.