Literature DB >> 14615336

Women's views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study.

Deirdre J Murphy1, Catherine Pope, Julia Frost, Rachel E Liebling.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To obtain the views of women on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour.
DESIGN: Qualitative interview study.
SETTING: Two urban teaching hospitals in the United Kingdom. PARTICIPANTS: Purposive sample of 27 women who had undergone operative delivery in the second stage of labour between January 2000 and January 2002. KEY THEMES: Preparation for birth, understandings of the indications for operative delivery, and explanation or debriefing after birth.
RESULTS: The women felt unprepared for operative delivery and thought that their birth plan or antenatal classes had not catered adequately for this event. They emphasised the importance of maintaining an open mind about the management of labour. They had difficulty understanding the need for operative delivery despite a review by medical and midwifery staff before discharge. Operative delivery had a noticeable impact on women's views about future pregnancy and delivery.
CONCLUSIONS: Women consider postnatal debriefing and medical review important deficiencies in current care. Those who experienced operative delivery in the second stage of labour would welcome the opportunity to have a later review of their intrapartum care, physical recovery, and management of future pregnancies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14615336      PMCID: PMC261808          DOI: 10.1136/bmj.327.7424.1132

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BMJ        ISSN: 0959-8138


  18 in total

1.  Can midwives reduce postpartum psychological morbidity? A randomized trial.

Authors:  T Lavender; S A Walkinshaw
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.689

2.  Aims, processes and problems of antenatal education as identified by three groups of childbirth teachers.

Authors:  M L Nolan; C Hicks
Journal:  Midwifery       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 2.372

3.  An investigation of women's involvement in the decision to deliver by caesarean section.

Authors:  W J Graham; V Hundley; A L McCheyne; M H Hall; E Gurney; J Milne
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1999-03

4.  Prevalence and predictors of post-traumatic stress symptoms following childbirth.

Authors:  J Czarnocka; P Slade
Journal:  Br J Clin Psychol       Date:  2000-03

5.  Adverse psychological impact of operative obstetric interventions: a prospective longitudinal study.

Authors:  J Fisher; J Astbury; A Smith
Journal:  Aust N Z J Psychiatry       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.744

6.  Posttraumatic stress disorder after childbirth: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  K Wijma; J Söderquist; B Wijma
Journal:  J Anxiety Disord       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

Review 7.  Post-traumatic stress disorder after childbirth: the phenomenon of traumatic birth.

Authors:  J L Reynolds
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-03-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Women's evaluation of the labor and delivery experience.

Authors:  M C Mackey
Journal:  Nursingconnections       Date:  1998

9.  Narratives of birth and the postpartum: analysis of the focus group responses of new mothers.

Authors:  M R DiMatteo; K L Kahn; S H Berry
Journal:  Birth       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 3.689

10.  The 'birth plan' experience.

Authors:  C E Ekeocha; P Jackson
Journal:  Br J Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  1985-01
View more
  13 in total

Review 1.  Forceps delivery in modern obstetric practice.

Authors:  Roshni R Patel; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-05-29

2.  Qualitative research and its uses in health care.

Authors:  Zakiya Q Al-Busaidi
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2008-03

Review 3.  Is it Time to Rejuvenate the Forceps?

Authors:  Sanchila Talukdar; Nikhil Purandare; Sam Coulter-Smith; Michael Geary
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2013-08-13

4.  Preferences for mode of delivery after previous caesarean section: what do women want, what do they get and how do they value outcomes?

Authors:  Clare L Emmett; Alan A Montgomery; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 3.377

5.  Outcome of subsequent pregnancy three years after previous operative delivery in the second stage of labour: cohort study.

Authors:  Rachna Bahl; Bryony Strachan; Deirdre J Murphy
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-14

6.  Neonatal outcomes and operative vaginal delivery versus cesarean delivery.

Authors:  Stephen A Contag; Rebecca G Clifton; Steven L Bloom; Catherine Y Spong; Michael W Varner; Dwight J Rouse; Susan M Ramin; Steve N Caritis; Alan M Peaceman; Yoram Sorokin; Anthony Sciscione; Marshall W Carpenter; Brian M Mercer; John M Thorp; Fergal D Malone; Jay D Iams
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  2010-01-22       Impact factor: 1.862

7.  Women's experience of transfer from midwifery unit to hospital obstetric unit during labour: a qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Rachel E Rowe; Jennifer J Kurinczuk; Louise Locock; Ray Fitzpatrick
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 3.007

8.  Experiences of non-progressive and augmented labour among nulliparous women: a qualitative interview study in a Grounded Theory approach.

Authors:  Hanne Kjaergaard; Anne Maria Foldgast; Anna-Karin Dykes
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2007-07-28       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Exploring women's personal experiences of giving birth in Gonabad city: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Fariba Askari; Alireza Atarodi; Shirin Torabi; Mahdi Moshki
Journal:  Glob J Health Sci       Date:  2014-05-08

10.  When choice becomes limited: Women's experiences of delay in labour.

Authors:  Natalie Armstrong; Sara Kenyon
Journal:  Health (London)       Date:  2016-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.