Literature DB >> 9511685

Aims, processes and problems of antenatal education as identified by three groups of childbirth teachers.

M L Nolan1, C Hicks.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To establish whether variations exist in the philosophy and approach of three groups of childbirth teachers working in different organisations in the UK. PARTICIPANTS: Two midwifery Parentcraft Sisters working in the UK maternity services, three National Childbirth Trust Antenatal Teachers and two Active Birth Teachers working in the voluntary sector, and two Midwife Teachers.
METHOD: Semi-structured interviews were tape-recorded, transcribed and analysed using a grounded theory approach to identify common categories.
FINDINGS: All three groups of teachers identified similar aims for antenatal education, with the need to build clients' confidence in their ability to give birth and care for their babies as the most important. However, the process by which the various teachers attempted to realise their aims appeared to be very different. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: In order to ensure the prioritization of antenatal education with purchasers and providers, childbirth teachers need to define more clearly the criteria by which it can be audited.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1997        PMID: 9511685     DOI: 10.1016/s0266-6138(97)80004-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Midwifery        ISSN: 0266-6138            Impact factor:   2.372


  11 in total

1.  The concerns and interests of expectant and new parents: assessing learning needs.

Authors:  Jane Svensson; Lesley Barclay; Margaret Cooke
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2006

2.  A descriptive survey of the educational preparation and practices of antenatal educators in ireland.

Authors:  Cathy O'Sullivan; Rhona O'Connell; Declan Devane
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2014

3.  Support needs of expectant mothers and fathers: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Margareta Widarsson; Birgitta Kerstis; Kristina Sundquist; Gabriella Engström; Anna Sarkadi
Journal:  J Perinat Educ       Date:  2012

Review 4.  Individual or group antenatal education for childbirth or parenthood, or both.

Authors:  A J Gagnon; J Sandall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-07-18

5.  Women's views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Catherine Pope; Julia Frost; Rachel E Liebling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

6.  Expectant parents' experiences of parental education within the antenatal health service.

Authors:  Ann Norling-Gustafsson; Katarina Skaghammar; Annsofie Adolfsson
Journal:  Psychol Res Behav Manag       Date:  2011-12-16

7.  Assessment of childbirth preparation classes: a parallel convergent mixed study.

Authors:  Robab Hassanzadeh; Fatemeh Abbas-Alizadeh; Shahla Meedya; Sakineh Mohammad-Alizadeh-Charandabi; Mojgan Mirghafourvand
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2019-11-07       Impact factor: 3.223

8.  Can father inclusive practice reduce paternal postnatal anxiety? A repeated measures cohort study using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale.

Authors:  Jenny Tohotoa; Bruce Maycock; Yvonne L Hauck; Satvinder Dhaliwal; Peter Howat; Sharyn Burns; Colin W Binns
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2012-07-31       Impact factor: 3.007

9.  Transition to parenthood: the needs of parents in pregnancy and early parenthood.

Authors:  Toity Deave; Debbie Johnson; Jenny Ingram
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 3.007

10.  The AEDUCATE Collaboration. Comprehensive antenatal education birth preparation programmes to reduce the rates of caesarean section in nulliparous women. Protocol for an individual participant data prospective meta-analysis.

Authors:  Kate M Levett; Sarah J Lord; Hannah G Dahlen; Caroline A Smith; Federico Girosi; Soo Downe; Kenneth William Finlayson; Julie Fleet; Mary Steen; Mary-Ann Davey; Elizabeth Newnham; Anette Werner; Leslie Arnott; Kerry Sutcliffe; Anna Lene Seidler; Kylie Elizabeth Hunter; Lisa Askie
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2020-09-23       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.