Literature DB >> 9883179

Women's evaluation of the labor and delivery experience.

M C Mackey1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to identify how women described and evaluated their labor and delivery experience and what factors were related to their responses. Sixty Lamaze-prepared, married multigravidae, aged 21 to 37 years, participated in this qualitative field study. Detailed, open-ended tape-recorded interviews were conducted on the postpartum unit of a community hospital or in the women's homes early during the postpartum period. Women evaluated their labor and delivery experience according to how well they perceived they had managed their own childbirth performance. Women who managed well viewed childbirth as positive, whereas women who had difficulty or managed poorly viewed it as both positive and negative. Women who managed well thought their own performance and the nature of labor and delivery (physical aspects) went well; women who had difficulty thought labor and delivery and the performance of others went well, but women who managed poorly had problems identifying anything that went well. There was overall agreement that the baby was the best part of the experience and that pain and pushing were the worst parts. Since women's evaluation of their labor and delivery experience may be related to the quality of their subsequent mothering, it is important to enhance their perceptions of their own performance, and thus their evaluation of the childbirth experience.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1998        PMID: 9883179

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nursingconnections        ISSN: 0895-2809


  3 in total

1.  The meaning of "control" for childbearing women in the US.

Authors:  Emily E Namey; Anne Drapkin Lyerly
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Women's views on the impact of operative delivery in the second stage of labour: qualitative interview study.

Authors:  Deirdre J Murphy; Catherine Pope; Julia Frost; Rachel E Liebling
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-11-15

3.  When birth is not as expected: a systematic review of the impact of a mismatch between expectations and experiences.

Authors:  Rebecca Webb; Susan Ayers; Annick Bogaerts; Ljiljana Jeličić; Paulina Pawlicka; Sarah Van Haeken; Nazihah Uddin; Rita Borg Xuereb; Natalija Kolesnikova
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-07-02       Impact factor: 3.007

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.