Literature DB >> 14608290

Differences in definity and optison microbubble destruction rates at a similar mechanical index with different real-time perfusion systems.

Carolin Sonne1, Feng Xie, John Lof, Joseph Oberdorfer, Patrick Phillips, E Carr Everbach, Thomas R Porter.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine microbubble responses to different pulse sequence schemes that exist on low mechanical index (MI) real-time perfusion imaging systems using either intravenous albumin-coated (Optison) or lipid-encapsulated (Definity) microbubbles. A tissue-mimicking phantom was created that permitted insonation of microbubbles at 3 cm (near field) and 9 cm (far field) from the diagnostic transducer face. Differences in effluent microbubble concentration were measured after they passed through vessels being insonified with pulse sequence schemes that transmitted alternating polarity (pulse inversion Doppler), alternating amplitude (power modulation), or both (contrast pulse sequencing) at a similar MI, frame rate, and transmit frequency. Normalized contrast signal intensity within a recirculating chamber was also measured in the near and far field. Pulse inversion Doppler produced less initial normalized contrast signal intensity and greater destruction rates than amplitude varying pulse sequence schemes like power modulation or contrast pulse sequencing at both the 0.1- and 0.2-MI settings. These differences indicate that the same MI setting on different real-time perfusion imaging techniques will produce different microbubble responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2003        PMID: 14608290     DOI: 10.1067/j.echo.2003.07.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr        ISSN: 0894-7317            Impact factor:   5.251


  13 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of myocardial perfusion with real-time myocardial contrast echocardiography: methodology and clinical applications.

Authors:  Abdou Elhendy; Thomas R Porter
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2005 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.952

2.  Improving sensitivity in ultrasound molecular imaging by tailoring contrast agent size distribution: in vivo studies.

Authors:  Jason E Streeter; Ryan Gessner; Iman Miles; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 4.488

3.  Contrast Ultrasound Imaging Does Not Affect Heat Shock Protein 70 Expression in Cholesterol-Fed Rabbit Aorta.

Authors:  Brendon W Smith; Douglas G Simpson; Rita J Miller; John W Erdman; William D O'Brien
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.153

4.  Use of ultrasound pulses combined with Definity for targeted blood-brain barrier disruption: a feasibility study.

Authors:  Nathan McDannold; Natalia Vykhodtseva; Kullervo Hynynen
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 2.998

5.  Hollow silica and silica-boron nano/microparticles for contrast-enhanced ultrasound to detect small tumors.

Authors:  Alexander Liberman; H Paul Martinez; Casey N Ta; Christopher V Barback; Robert F Mattrey; Yuko Kono; Sarah L Blair; William C Trogler; Andrew C Kummel; Zhe Wu
Journal:  Biomaterials       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 12.479

6.  Mechanically Tunable Hollow Silica Ultrathin Nanoshells for Ultrasound Contrast Agents.

Authors:  A Liberman; J Wang; N Lu; R D Viveros; C A Allen; R F Mattrey; S L Blair; W C Trogler; M J Kim; A C Kummel
Journal:  Adv Funct Mater       Date:  2015-05-21       Impact factor: 18.808

Review 7.  Advances in transcranial Doppler ultrasonography.

Authors:  Georgios Tsivgoulis; Andrei V Alexandrov; Michael A Sloan
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 5.081

8.  Fast microbubble dwell-time based ultrasonic molecular imaging approach for quantification and monitoring of angiogenesis in cancer.

Authors:  Marybeth A Pysz; Ismayil Guracar; Lu Tian; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-06-15

9.  PLGA Nanoparticles for Ultrasound-Mediated Gene Delivery to Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Marxa Figueiredo; Rinat Esenaliev
Journal:  J Drug Deliv       Date:  2012-02-28

Review 10.  Ultrasound-mediated disruption of the blood tumor barrier for improved therapeutic delivery.

Authors:  T A Arsiwala; S A Sprowls; K E Blethen; C E Adkins; P A Saralkar; R A Fladeland; W Pentz; A Gabriele; B Kielkowski; R I Mehta; P Wang; J S Carpenter; M Ranjan; U Najib; A R Rezai; P R Lockman
Journal:  Neoplasia       Date:  2021-06-14       Impact factor: 6.218

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.